Use and Perceptions of Caffeinated Energy Drinks and Energy Shots in Canada

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 866-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Wiggers ◽  
Jessica L. Reid ◽  
Christine M. White ◽  
David Hammond
Keyword(s):  
Nutrients ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 314
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Jagim ◽  
Patrick S. Harty ◽  
Abdelrahman R. Barakat ◽  
Jacob L. Erickson ◽  
Victoria Carvalho ◽  
...  

Background: Energy drinks are one of the most popular packaged beverage products consumed within the United States (US). Energy drinks are considered a functional beverage, a category that also includes sports drinks and nutraceutical beverages. Purpose: The focus of the current study was to examine the nutrition fact panels of the top selling commercially available energy drink and energy shot products within the US to characterize common ingredient profiles to help establish a standard definition and ingredient profile of energy drinks and energy shots for consumers, health care practitioners, and researchers. Methods: The top 75 commercially available energy drinks and shots were identified and compiled from multiple commercial retail websites as of September 2021. For the purpose of this study, an energy drink must have met the following criteria: (A) marketed as an energy drink; (B) purported to improve energy, focus, or alertness; (C) not sold as a dietary supplement (no supplement fact panels); (D) manufactured as a pre-packaged and ready-to-drink beverage; and (E) contains at least three of (1) caffeine, (2) B-vitamins, (3) sugar, (4) taurine, (5) creatine, (6) quercetin, (7) guarana, (8) ginseng, (9) coenzyme Q10, or (10) branched chain amino acids. Energy shots must have met similar criteria to be included: (A) marketed as an energy shot; (B) purported to improve energy, focus, or alertness; (C) sold as a dietary supplement; (D) manufactured as a pre-packaged beverage with a small volume (<3.5 mL); and (E) contains at least three of the ingredients stated above. Results: Twenty energy shots and fifty-five energy drinks were included in this analysis. The number of ingredients per product (mean ± SD) was 18.2 ± 5.7, with 15 products containing proprietary blends with undisclosed ingredient amounts. The relative prevalence and average amounts of the top ingredients were as follows: caffeine (100%; 174.4 ± 81.1 mg), vitamin B6 (72%; 366.9 ± 648.1 percent daily value (%DV)), vitamin B3 (67%; 121.44 ± 69.9% DV), vitamin B12 (67%; 5244.5 ± 10,474.6% DV), vitamin B5 (37.3%; 113.6 ± 76.6% DV), and taurine (37.3%; amounts undisclosed). Conclusions: Our findings suggest a high prevalence of caffeine and B-vitamins in these energy products, with many of the formulations containing well above the recommended daily value of B-vitamins.


2016 ◽  
Vol 181 (9) ◽  
pp. 1016-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selasi Attipoe ◽  
Jeffrey Leggit ◽  
Patricia A. Deuster

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Selasi Attipoe ◽  
Patrick Singley ◽  
Patricia Deuster

Circulation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (suppl_12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachin A Shah ◽  
Abby Kurtz ◽  
Jessica Leong ◽  
Anthony E Dargush

Introduction: Energy drinks are commonly used to boost cognitive performance. However, this is paralleled with a significant increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressures. No studies have evaluated these changes with energy “shots” and whether these effects are driven solely by the caffeine component in energy drinks or a multitude of ingredients remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if the effects of regular (caffeinated) 5-Hour Energy® shot differ from that of decaffeinated 5-Hour Energy® (decaf) shot as assessed by changes in systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover study conducted at a university campus. Healthy subjects, between 18-40 years of age with a blood pressure less than 140/90 and not on any medications were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomized into either the regular 5-Hour Energy® drink or the decaf 5-Hour Energy® drink study arms with blood pressure recorded at baseline, 1, 3 and 5 hours. Following a washout period of at least 6 days, the same was performed giving the alternate study drink. Additionally, heart rate, adverse events and energy score (1-5 scale) were also assessed. Results: Ten males and 10 females were enrolled in the study with 90% (18 of 20) being of Asian race. Average age was 23.3±2.7 years, weighing 149.1±31.7 pounds with SBP of 114±11.3 mmHg and DBP of 69.5±7.6 mmHg. Baseline coffee consumption was less than 2 cups per week in 11 subjects and at least 1 cup per day in the remainder. The maximum SBP increase from baseline in the regular arm was 7.8±6.5 mmHg versus 2.8±5.6 mmHg in the decaf arm (p = 0.046). Maximum DBP increase was 6.3±3.7mmHg and 1.0±5.4 mmHg (p = 0.003) in the regular and decaf arms, respectively. Significant increases in systolic and diastolic pressures were evident at 1 and 3 hours post consumption (p ≤ 0.027) but not at 5 hours. Maximum heart rate or energy levels between the two groups were not significantly different (p ≥ 0.436). In subgroup analysis, regular energy drinks invoked a significantly higher increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressures (p ≤ 0.003) 1 hour post consumption in caffeine naïve subjects (n=11). Conclusion: Regular energy drinks available in the form of a “shot” increase both systolic and diastolic blood pressures by approximately 5mmHg. This effect appears to be exaggerated in caffeine naïve subjects.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1505-1516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa M. Norberg ◽  
Amie R. Newins ◽  
Llewellyn Mills ◽  
Lindsay S. Ham

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document