Effects of Dose Reduction on Diagnostic Image Quality of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Children Using a Third-Generation Dual-Source Computed Tomography Scanner

2018 ◽  
Vol 122 (7) ◽  
pp. 1260-1264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moustafa Rashed ◽  
Puja Banka ◽  
Ashita Barthur ◽  
Robert D. MacDougal ◽  
Rahul H. Rathod ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 106 (7) ◽  
pp. 485-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco M. Ochs ◽  
Fabian aus dem Siepen ◽  
Thomas Fritz ◽  
Florian Andre ◽  
Gitsios Gitsioudis ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilias Tsiflikas ◽  
Tanja Drosch ◽  
Harald Brodoefel ◽  
Christoph Thomas ◽  
Anja Reimann ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 119 (8) ◽  
pp. 1156-1161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Apfaltrer ◽  
Dieter H. Szolar ◽  
Eric Wurzinger ◽  
Richard A.P. Takx ◽  
John W. Nance ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Tom Finck ◽  
Konstantin Klambauer ◽  
Eva Hendrich ◽  
Albrecht Will ◽  
Stefan Martinoff ◽  
...  

Objective: To investigate a high-pitch spiral first (HPSF) approach for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in an unselected patient cohort and compare diagnostic yield and radiation exposure to CCTAs acquired via conventional, non-high-pitch spiral first (NHPSF) scan regimes. Materials and Methods: All consecutive patients from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2017 were included. Two investigation protocols (HPSF/NHPSF) were used with the aim to achieve diagnostic image quality of all coronary segments. Low-pitch secondary scans followed the initial examination if image quality was unsatisfactory. Dosage and image quality were compared between both regimes. Results: 1410 patients were subject to a HPSF and 236 patients to a NHPSF approach. While the HPSF approach led to a higher fraction of re-scans (35% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), the fraction of aggregate scans that remained non-diagnostic after considering the initial and secondary scan was comparably low for the HPSF and NHPSF approach (0.78 vs. 0%, p = 0.18). Aggregate radiation exposure in the HPSF protocol was significantly lower (1.12 mSv (IQR: 0.73, 2.10) vs. 3.96 mSv (IQR: 2.23, 8.33) p < 0.001). Conclusions: In spite of a higher number of re-scans, a HPSF approach leads to a reduction in overall radiation exposure with diagnostic yields similar to a NHPSF approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document