Image Quality of ECG-Triggered High-Pitch, Dual-Source Computed Tomography Angiography for Cardiovascular Assessment in Children

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
Christian A. Barrera ◽  
Hansel J. Otero ◽  
Ammie M. White ◽  
David Saul ◽  
David M. Biko
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Computed Tomography Angiography ◽  
High Pitch ◽  
Cardiovascular Assessment ◽  
Dual Source ◽  
Dual Source Computed Tomography

Diagnostic accuracy and image quality of cardiac dual-source computed tomography in patients with arrhythmia

2010 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilias Tsiflikas ◽  
Tanja Drosch ◽  
Harald Brodoefel ◽  
Christoph Thomas ◽  
Anja Reimann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Dual Source ◽  
Dual Source Computed Tomography

scholarly journals Radiation Dose and Image Quality of a High-Pitch Prospective Spiral First Approach in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Tom Finck ◽  
Konstantin Klambauer ◽  
Eva Hendrich ◽  
Albrecht Will ◽  
Stefan Martinoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Computed Tomography Angiography ◽  
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Diagnostic Image Quality ◽  
High Pitch ◽  
Coronary Computed Tomography

Objective: To investigate a high-pitch spiral first (HPSF) approach for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in an unselected patient cohort and compare diagnostic yield and radiation exposure to CCTAs acquired via conventional, non-high-pitch spiral first (NHPSF) scan regimes. Materials and Methods: All consecutive patients from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2017 were included. Two investigation protocols (HPSF/NHPSF) were used with the aim to achieve diagnostic image quality of all coronary segments. Low-pitch secondary scans followed the initial examination if image quality was unsatisfactory. Dosage and image quality were compared between both regimes. Results: 1410 patients were subject to a HPSF and 236 patients to a NHPSF approach. While the HPSF approach led to a higher fraction of re-scans (35% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), the fraction of aggregate scans that remained non-diagnostic after considering the initial and secondary scan was comparably low for the HPSF and NHPSF approach (0.78 vs. 0%, p = 0.18). Aggregate radiation exposure in the HPSF protocol was significantly lower (1.12 mSv (IQR: 0.73, 2.10) vs. 3.96 mSv (IQR: 2.23, 8.33) p < 0.001). Conclusions: In spite of a higher number of re-scans, a HPSF approach leads to a reduction in overall radiation exposure with diagnostic yields similar to a NHPSF approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document