Safe, timely, convenient, and cost-effective: a single-center experience with bedside placement of enteral feeding tubes by midlevel providers using fluoroscopic guidance

2012 ◽  
Vol 204 (6) ◽  
pp. 958-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tricia B. Hauschild ◽  
Katy Y. Fu ◽  
Randall C. Hipwell ◽  
Gabriele Baraghoshi ◽  
Mary C. Mone ◽  
...  
HPB ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S186-S187
Author(s):  
J. Hawksworth ◽  
N.P. Llore ◽  
M.L. Holzner ◽  
P. Radkani ◽  
E. Mesler ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uirá Fernandes TEIXEIRA ◽  
Marcos Bertozzi GOLDONI ◽  
Mayara Christ MACHRY ◽  
Pedro Ney CECCON ◽  
Paulo Roberto Ott FONTES ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for gallstone disease, and has been perfomed as an outpatient surgery in many Institutions over the last few years. Objective - This is a retrospective study of a single center in Brazil, that aims to analyze the outcomes of 200 cases of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by the same Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary team, evaluating the safety and cost-effectiveness of the method. Methods - Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospectively analyzed; some of them underwent additional procedures, as liver biopsies and abdominal hernias repair. Results - From a total of 200 cases, the outpatient surgery protocol could not be carried out in 22 (11%). Twenty one (95.5%) patients remained hospitalized for 1 day and 1 (4.5%) patient remained hospitalized for 2 days. From the 178 patients who underwent ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 3 (1.7 %) patients returned to the emergency room before the review appointment. Hospital cost was on average 35% lower for the ambulatory group. Conclusion - With appropriate selection criteria, ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible, safe and effective; readmission rate is low, as well as complications related to the method. Cost savings and patient satisfaction support its adoption. Other studies are necessary to recommend this procedure as standard practice in Brazil.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 959-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conor H. O’Neill ◽  
Jaclyn Moore ◽  
Prejesh Philips ◽  
Robert C. G. Martin

2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swaroop Gopal ◽  
Satish Rudrappa ◽  
Arunkumar Sekar ◽  
Veeramani Preethish-Kumar ◽  
Dheeraj Masapu

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 471-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Dollinger ◽  
Lukas Philipp Beyer ◽  
Michael Haimerl ◽  
Christoph Niessen ◽  
Ernst-Michael Jung ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Gurevich-Shapiro ◽  
Sharon Tzadok ◽  
Alina Rosenberg ◽  
Aida Inbal ◽  
Michal Bar-Natan ◽  
...  

Background: Refractoriness to platelet transfusion, prevalent among 15-20% of hemato-oncological patients, is associated with multitransfusions and inferior outcomes. We evaluated the effectiveness of extended slow-dose transfusion (ESDT) in increasing platelet increments in multitransfused patients. Methods: Patients treated after the implementation of ESDT were compared with historical controls treated with standard single-donor platelet (SDP) transfusions. Cohorts of early and late recipients were assembled for comparison, i.e. the 8th or 9th and 11th platelet unit per patient, respectively. Patients in the ESDT group received transfusions equal to half an SDP unit, administered over 4 h. Effectiveness was defined as a higher corrected count increment (CCI) at 1, 12, and 24 h after transfusion. Results: In the early-recipients cohort, 24-h-posttransfusion increments were available for 29 ESDT patients and 6 standard patients, and did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.078). The 24-h-posttransfusion increment was available for 20 ESDT patients and 7 standard patients in the late-recipients cohort. The CCI was significantly higher in the ESDT group (p = 0.042). ABO compatibility improved the CCI (p = 0.01). Conclusions: ESDT demonstrated slightly higher increments at 24 h after transfusion in late recipients, suggesting this could be a cost-effective approach for the treatment of thrombocytopenic multitransfused hemato-oncological patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document