The semi-weak square principle

2019 ◽  
Vol 170 (11) ◽  
pp. 102713
Author(s):  
Maxwell Levine
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 221 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Krueger

2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 587-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
KONSTANTINOS TSAPROUNIS

AbstractThe resurrection axioms are forms of forcing axioms that were introduced recently by Hamkins and Johnstone, who developed on earlier ideas of Chalons and Veličković. In this note, we introduce a stronger form of resurrection (which we callunboundedresurrection) and show that it gives rise to families of axioms which are consistent relative to extendible cardinals, and which imply the strongest known instances of forcing axioms, such as Martin’s Maximum++. In addition, we study the unbounded resurrection postulates in terms of consistency lower bounds, obtaining, for example, failures of the weak square principle.


2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAXWELL LEVINE

AbstractWe assume the existence of a supercompact cardinal and produce a model with weak square but no very good scale at a particular cardinal. This follows work of Cummings, Foreman, and Magidor, but uses a different approach. We produce another model, starting from countably many supercompact cardinals, where □K,<K holds but □K, λ fails for λ < K.


1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 1087-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest Schimmerling

Definition 1.1. Suppose that λ ≤ κ are cardinals and Γ is a subset of (κ, κ+). By , we mean the principle asserting that there is a sequence 〈Fν | ν ∈ lim(Γ)〉 such that for every ν ∈ lim(Γ), the following hold.(1) 1 ≤ card(Fν) < λ.(2) The following hold for every C ∈ Fν.(a) C ⊆ ν ∩ Γ,(b) C is club in ν,(c) o.t.(C) ≤ κ,By we mean . If Γ = (κ, κ+), then we write for and for .These weak square principles were introduced in [Sch2, 5.1]. They generalize Jensen's principles □κ and , which are equivalent to and respectively. Jensen's global □ principle implies □κ for all κ.Theorem 1.2. Suppose that is a core model. Assume that every countable premouse M which elementarily embeds into a level of is (ω1 + 1)-iterable. Then, for every κ, holds in .The minimal non-1-small mouse is essentially a sharp for an inner model with a Woodin cardinal. We originally proved Theorem 1.2 under the assumption that is 1-small, building on [MiSt] and [Sch2]. Some generalizations followed by combining our methods with those of [St2] and [SchSt2]. (For example, the tame countably certified core model Kc satisfies .) In order to eliminate the smallness assumption all together, one replaces our use of the Dodd-Jensen lemma in proofs of condensation properties for with the weak Dodd-Jensen lemma of [NSt].


2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 150-154
Author(s):  
Yair Hayut ◽  
Spencer Unger
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (09) ◽  
pp. 3339-3339 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Cummings ◽  
Menachem Magidor
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 1750010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yair Hayut ◽  
Chris Lambie-Hanson

We investigate the relationship between weak square principles and simultaneous reflection of stationary sets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document