Numerical computations of resonant sloshing using the modified isoAdvector method and the buoyancy-modified turbulence closure model

2019 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 101829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinlong Li ◽  
Yunxiang You ◽  
Ke Chen ◽  
Xinshu Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Turbulence Closure ◽  
Closure Model ◽  
Numerical Computations ◽  
Turbulence Closure Model

Comparison of a Nonlinear k-ε Turbulence Closure Model With Stress Transport Models

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad A. R. Sharif ◽  
Yat-Kit E. Wong
Keyword(s):  
Pipe Flow ◽  
Flow Problem ◽  
Swirling Flow ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Turbulent Pipe Flow ◽  
Turbulence Closure ◽  
Closure Model ◽  
Transport Models ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Turbulence Closure Model

Abstract The performance of a nonlinear k-ϵ turbulence closure model (NKEM), in the prediction of isothermal incompressible turbulent flows, is compared with that of the stress transport models such as the differential Reynolds stress transport model (RSTM) and the algebraic stress transport model (ASTM). Fully developed turbulent pipe flow and confined turbulent swirling flow with a central non-swirling jet are numerically predicted using the Marker and Cell (MAC) finite difference method. Comparison of the prediction with the experiment show that all three models perform reasonably well for the pipe flow problem. For the swirling flow problem, the RSTM and ASTM is superior than the NKEM. RSTM and ASTM provide good agreement with measured mean velocity profiles. However, the turbulent stresses are over- or under-predicted. NKEM performs badly in prediction of mean velocity as well as the turbulent stresses.

Further Development of the k-? (Enstrophy) Turbulence Closure Model

AIAA Journal ◽  
10.2514/2.298 ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 1825-1833 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. F. Robinson ◽  
H. A. Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Turbulence Closure ◽  
Closure Model ◽  
Turbulence Closure Model ◽  
Further Development
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document