Mechanisms of the portion size effect. What is known and where do we go from here?

Appetite ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 39-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laural English ◽  
Marlou Lasschuijt ◽  
Kathleen L. Keller
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Stanley Burger ◽  
Susan L. Johnson

Increases in portion size lead to increases in energy intake, yet the mechanisms behind this ‘portion size effect’ are unclear. This study tested possible mechanisms of the portion size effect i.e., bite size and visual cues in 30 over- and normal-weight individuals (15 men, 15 women). A 2x2 repeated measures, within-subject design was used to test the effects of portion size (410g vs. 820g of a pasta dish) and visual cues (blindfolded vs. visible) on energy intake. At each meal participants were exposed to one of four experimental conditions (small portion/visible; small portion/blindfold; large portion/visible; large portion/blindfold). Participant characteristics, food intake, number of bites, meal duration, palatability measures and hunger and fullness were assessed. In response to a doubling of the portion presented, entrée energy intake increased 26% (220kcal P < 0.001) and mean bite size increased 2.4g/bite (P < 0.05). Overweight individuals consumed 40% (334kcal) more of the entrée in response to the large portion condition (P < 0.05), while lean individuals’ intakes did not differ (P < 0.56). A 12% (122kcal) decrease in entrée intake was observed in the blindfolded condition (P < 0.01), but no portion by visual cue interaction was found; indicating that blindfolding did not attenuate the portion size effect. These data suggest that the portion size effect is greater in overweight individuals and occurs via changes in bite size.


Appetite ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 334-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faris M. Zuraikat ◽  
Liane S. Roe ◽  
Christine E. Sanchez ◽  
Barbara J. Rolls

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-331
Author(s):  
E. Gray ◽  
H.T. Lau ◽  
R. Lee ◽  
L. Lockshin ◽  
C. Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Appetite ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Keenan ◽  
Louise Childs ◽  
Peter J. Rogers ◽  
Marion M. Hetherington ◽  
Jeffrey M. Brunstrom
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 1208-1208
Author(s):  
Paige Cunningham ◽  
Liane Roe ◽  
Kathleen Keller ◽  
Anouk Hendriks ◽  
Barbara Rolls

Abstract Objectives Individuals eat more when served larger portions, and this may be influenced by eating-related microstructural behaviors. In a controlled study, we explored whether microstructural components of eating such as eating rate, bite size, bite count, and meal duration influenced the portion size effect. Methods In a randomized crossover design, 44 adults aged 18 to 68 y (66% women; 45% with overweight or obesity) ate lunch in the laboratory once a week for four weeks. The meal consisted of a single dish of pasta (1.4 kcal/g) that was varied in portion size (400,500, 600, or 700 g) along with ∼700 g of water. Intake was assessed by weighing items before and after the meal. To characterize eating microstructure, meals were video-recorded to assess bite counts and meal duration, which were used to calculate mean eating rate (g/min) and mean bite size (g/bite). The influence of eating microstructure on the portion size effect was analyzed by random coefficients models. Results As larger portions were served, meal intake increased in a curvilinear manner (P < 0.0001). Compared to the smallest portion, intake of the largest portion increased by a mean (±SEM) of 123 ± 16 g (43%). As portions were increased, there were similar increases in bite count (35%) and meal duration (38%; both P < 0.0001), but only small increases in mean bite size (8%; P = 0.019) and no significant change in eating rate (P = 0.92). Measures of eating microstructure did not moderate the portion size effect but did have main effects on intake across all portions. Individuals ate more at the meal when they ate faster, took larger bites, took more bites, or ate for longer (all P < 0.0001). Body mass index did not influence eating microstructure or the strength of the portion size effect but had a modest negative effect on intake across all meals (−5.9 ± 2.7 g/unit increase in BMI; P = 0.046). Conclusions Eating-related microstructural behaviors influenced meal intake across portions, but did not moderate the effect of portion size on intake. Individuals who ate faster and took larger bites ate more across all portions, possibly as a result of reduced oro-sensory exposure, which can delay meal termination. Targeted interventions to alter components of eating microstructure have the potential as strategies to reduce overconsumption. Funding Sources NIDDK, Jenny Craig.


2019 ◽  
Vol 204 ◽  
pp. 191-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faris M. Zuraikat ◽  
Alissa D. Smethers ◽  
Barbara J. Rolls
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Almiron-Roig ◽  
Ciaran G Forde ◽  
Gareth J Hollands ◽  
M Ángeles Vargas ◽  
Jeffrey M Brunstrom

Abstract Although there is considerable evidence for the portion-size effect and its potential impact on health, much of this has not been successfully applied to help consumers reduce portion sizes. The objective of this review is to provide an update on the strength of evidence supporting strategies with potential to reduce portion sizes across individuals and eating contexts. Three levels of action are considered: food-level strategies (targeting commercial snack and meal portion sizes, packaging, food labels, tableware, and food sensory properties), individual-level strategies (targeting eating rate and bite size, portion norms, plate-cleaning tendencies, and cognitive processes), and population approaches (targeting the physical, social, and economic environment and health policy). Food- and individual-level strategies are associated with small to moderate effects; however, in isolation, none seem to have sufficient impact on food intake to reverse the portion-size effect and its consequences. Wider changes to the portion-size environment will be necessary to support individual- and food-level strategies leading to portion control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document