scholarly journals Orientation of Transverse Acetabular Ligament With Reference to Anterior Pelvic Plane

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Kamal Deep ◽  
Anjan Prabhakara ◽  
Diwakar Mohan ◽  
Vivek Mahajan ◽  
Mohamed Sameer
2019 ◽  
pp. 112070001987482
Author(s):  
Arthur J Kievit ◽  
Johannes G G Dobbe ◽  
Wouter H Mallee ◽  
Leendert Blankevoort ◽  
Geert J Streekstra ◽  
...  

Introduction: We tested whether a mechanical device (such as Hipsecure) to pinpoint the anterior pelvic plane (APP) as a guide can improve acetabular cup placement. To assess accuracy we asked: (1) is the APP an effective guide to position acetabular cup placement within acceptable ° of divergence from the optimal 40° inclination and 15° anteversion; (2) could a mechanical device increase the number of acetabular cup placements within Lewinnek’s safe zone (i.e. inclination 30° to 50°; anteversion 5° to 25°)? Methods: 16 cadaveric specimens were used to assess the 3D surgical success of using a mechanical device APP to guide acetabular cup placement along the APP. We used the Hipsecure mechanical device to implant acetabular cups at 40° inclination and 15° anteversion. Subequently, all cadaveric specimens with implants were scanned with a CT and 3D models were created of the pelvis and acetabular cups to assess the outcome in terms of Lewinnek’s safe zones. Results: The mean inclination of the 16 implants was 40.6° (95% CI, 37.7–43.4) and the mean anteversion angle was 13.4° (95% CI, 10.7–16.1). All 16 cup placements were within Lewinnek’s safe zone for inclination (between 30° and 50°) and all but 2 were within Lewinnek’s safe zone for anteversion (between 5° and 25°). Conclusion: In cadaveric specimens, the use of a mechanical device and the APP as a guide for acetabular cup placement resulted in good positioning with respect to both of Lewinnek’s safe zones.


2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 474-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirohito Abe ◽  
Takashi Sakai ◽  
Toshimitsu Hamasaki ◽  
Masaki Takao ◽  
Takashi Nishii ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (12) ◽  
pp. 1781-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
GREGORY A. KONRATH ◽  
ANDREW J. HAMEL ◽  
STEVE A. OLSON ◽  
BRIAN BAY ◽  
NEIL A. SHARKEY

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. S766-S771
Author(s):  
Archit Agarwal ◽  
Inder Pawar ◽  
Sandeep Singh ◽  
Deepti Randev ◽  
Hem Chandra Sati

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 626-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Colombi ◽  
Daniele Schena ◽  
Claudio Carlo Castelli

Preoperative planning is mandatory to achieve the restoration of a correct and personalized biomechanics of the hip. The radiographic review is the first and fundamental step in the planning. Limb or pelvis malpositioning during the review results in mislead planning. Correct templating is possible using three different methods: acetate templating on digital X-ray, digital 2D templating on digital X-ray and 3D digital templating on CT scan. Time efficiency, costs, reproducibility and accuracy must be considered when comparing different templating methods. Based on these parameters, acetate templating should not be abandoned; digital templating allows a permanent record of planning and can be electronically viewed by different members of surgical team; 3D templating is intrinsically more accurate. There is no evidence in the few recently published studies that 3D templating impacts positively on clinical outcomes except in difficult cases. The transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) is a reliable intraoperative soft tissue reference to set cup position. Spine–hip relations in osteoarthritic patients undergoing hip joint replacement must be considered. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:626-632. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180075


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 574-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Griffin ◽  
Diana M. Perriman ◽  
Claire J. Bolton ◽  
Paul N. Smith

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document