In Response to “Treatment of Severe Bone Defects During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Structural Allografts and Porous Metal Cones — A Systematic Review”

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 1287-1289
Author(s):  
Ivan De Martino ◽  
Peter K. Sculco
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Porous Metal ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Structural Allografts

scholarly journals Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: therapeutic options and results

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 1073-1086
Author(s):  
E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán ◽  
Primitivo Gómez-Cardero ◽  
Carlos A. Encinas-Ullán
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Porous Metal ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Septic Loosening ◽  
Total Knee

The treatment of small to moderate size defects in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) has yielded good results with various techniques (cement and screws, small metal augments, impaction bone grafting and modular stems). However, the treatment of severe defects remains problematic. Severe defects have typically been treated with large allograft and metaphyseal sleeves. The use of structural allograft has decreased in recent years due to increased long-term failure rates and the introduction of highly porous metal augments (cones and sleeves). A systematic review of level IV evidence studies on the outcomes of rTKA metaphyseal sleeves found a 4% rate of septic revision, and a rate of septic loosening of the sleeves of 0.35%. Aseptic re-revision was required in 3% of the cases. The rate of aseptic loosening of the sleeves was 0.7%, and the rate of intraoperative fracture was 3.1%. The mean follow-up was 3.7 years. Another systematic review of tantalum cones and sleeves found a reoperation rate of 9.7% and a 0.8% rate of aseptic loosening per sleeve. For cones, the reoperation rate was 18.7%, and the rate of aseptic loosening per cone was 1.7%. The reported survival of metal sleeves was 99.1% at three years, 98.7% at five years and 97.8% at 10 years. The reported survival free of cone revision for aseptic loosening was 100%, and survival free of any cone revision was 98%. Survival free of any revision or reoperation was 90% and 83%, respectively. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1073-1086. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210007

Aseptic Loosening of Porous Metaphyseal Sleeves and Tantalum Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan P. Roach ◽  
Andrew J. Clair ◽  
Omar A. Behery ◽  
Savyasachi C. Thakkar ◽  
Richard Iorio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Mesh Terms ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Revision Tkas

AbstractBone loss often complicates revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Management of metaphyseal defects varies, with no clearly superior technique. Two commonly utilized options for metaphyseal defect management include porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves and tantalum cones. A systematic review was conducted according to the international Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We combined search terms “Total knee arthroplasty” AND/OR “Sleeve,” “Cone” as either keywords or medical subject heading (MeSH) terms in multiple databases according to PRISMA recommendations. All retrieved articles were reviewed and assessed using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 27 studies (12 sleeves and 15 cones) of revision TKAs were included. In the 12 studies on sleeve implantation in revision TKAs, 1,617 sleeves were implanted in 1,133 revision TKAs in 1,025 patients. The overall rate of reoperation was 110/1,133 (9.7%) and the total rate of aseptic loosening per sleeve was 13/1,617 (0.8%). In the 15 studies on tantalum cone implantation in revision TKAs, 701 cones were implanted into 620 revision TKAs in 612 patients. The overall rate of reoperation was 116/620 (18.7%), and the overall rate of aseptic loosening per cone was 12/701 (1.7%). Rates of aseptic loosening of the two implants were found to be similar, while the rate of reoperation was nearly double in revision TKAs utilizing tantalum cones. Variability in the selected studies and the likely multifactorial nature of failure do not allow for any definitive conclusions to be made. This review elucidates the necessity for additional literature examining revision TKA implants.

scholarly journals Reconstruction for Massive Proximal Tibial Bone Defects Using Patient-customized Three-dimensional-printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Li ◽  
Xinguang Wang ◽  
Hua Tian
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
3D Printed ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Highly Porous

Abstract Background: The reconstruction of massive bone defects is one of the main challenges in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). Although several methods are available, each of them has its prominent shortcomings. The purpose of this study is to review the clinical outcomes of RTKA with massive proximal tibial bone defects using patient-customized three-dimensional (3D)-printed highly porous metaphyseal cones.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed seven RTKAs with Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) type III tibial defects using patient-customized 3D-printed highly porous metaphyseal cones, which have been performed at a single institution between 2016 and 2018. Results: The mean age at diagnosis of the patients was 68 years old (61-77). The mean length of follow-up was 25.3 months (19-36). At the latest follow-up, no aseptic loosening or prosthetic joint infection has been determined. The mean HSS increased from 49 (39-63) to 78 (70-83) (P<0.01); the mean WOMAC increased from 59 (46-73) to 26 (12-38) (P<0.01). All patients obtained the range of motion and mechanical alignment improvement postoperatively.Conclusion: The patient-customized 3D-printed metaphyseal cone could be a promising technique in addressing severe tibial defects in RTKA. Our study shows encouraging short-term clinical and radiological outcomes with no aseptic loosening, periprosthetic infection, or fracture. Nevertheless, further follow-up and the expansion of sample size are needed to demonstrate the advantage of this innovative technique fully.

scholarly journals Excellent mid-term osseointegration and implant survival using metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 3843-3848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian M. Klim ◽  
Florian Amerstorfer ◽  
Gerwin A. Bernhardt ◽  
Patrick Sadoghi ◽  
Georg Hauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Mid Term Results

Abstract Purpose Metaphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) is a very promising treatment option for extended bone defects. Currently published mid-term results remain limited. The purpose was to analyse the implant durability, the clinical and the radiological mid-term results in RTKA when using metaphyseal sleeves. Methods Clinical and radiological follow-up examinations were performed in 92 patients (93 knees) with RTKA using hybrid fixation technique (cementless sleeves and stem). Radiographic measurements regarding osseointegration at the bone–sleeve interface were performed and the range of motion (ROM), a subjective satisfaction score (SSS), the American Knee Society Score (KSS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) as well as the SF-36 Health survey were examined. Bone defects were analysed using the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification. Results No knee had to be revised due to aseptic loosening at the time of the follow-up (mean 6.3 years ± 2.3, minimum 2 years). Satisfactory radiographic osseointegration at the sleeve/bone interface was detected in 96.1% of cases. 17 knees (18.2%) had to be re-revised, 15 of them due to a recurrent infection and 2 due to aseptic reasons (mediolateral instability and a periprosthetic fracture). The median of the ROM (96°), SSS (8), KSS (87), WOMAC (9), SF-36 MCS (55) and SF-36 PCS (38) showed very satisfying results. Conclusion No case of aseptic loosening was found in this large series of RTKA with extended bone defects using metaphyseal sleeve fixation. In this large retrospective series, it has been shown that this technique is an excellent treatment option for extended bone defects in RTKA surgery. Level of evidence Retrospective cohort study, level III.

Reconstruction of Massive Bone Defects with Allograft in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty*

1997 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad T. Ghazavi ◽  
I. Stockley ◽  
Gilbert Yee ◽  
Aileen Davis ◽  
Allan E. Gross
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Massive Bone
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document