Utility of Preoperative Femoral Neck Geometry in Predicting Femoral Stem Anteversion

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1079-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwan Kyu Park ◽  
Tsung-Yuan Tsai ◽  
Dimitris Dimitriou ◽  
Young-Min Kwon
1993 ◽  
Vol 53 (S1) ◽  
pp. S41-S46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Beck ◽  
Christopher B. Ruff ◽  
Khem Bissessur

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110407
Author(s):  
Samuel Morgan ◽  
Ofer Sadovnic ◽  
Moshe Iluz ◽  
Simon Garceau ◽  
Nisan Amzallag ◽  
...  

Background: Femoral anteversion is a major contributor to functionality of the hip joint and is implicated in many joint pathologies. Accurate determination of component version intraoperatively is a technically challenging process that relies on the visual estimation of the surgeon. The following study aimed to examine whether the walls of the femoral neck can be used as appropriate landmarks to ensure appropriate femoral prosthesis version intraoperatively. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study based on 32 patients (64 hips) admitted to our centre between July and September 2020 who had undergone a CT scan of their lower limbs. Through radiological imaging analysis, the following measurements were performed bilaterally for each patient: anterior wall version, posterior wall version, and mid-neck femoral version. Anterior and posterior wall version were compared and evaluated relative to mid-neck version, which represented the true version value. Results: Mean anterior wall anteversion was 20° (95% CI, 17.6–22.8°) and mean posterior wall anteversion was −12° (95% CI, −15 to −9.7°). The anterior walls of the femoral neck had a constant of −7 and a coefficient of 0.9 (95% CI, −9.8 to −4.2; p  < 0.0001; R2 0.77). The posterior walls of the femoral neck had a constant of 20 and a coefficient of 0.7 (95% CI, 17.8–22.5; p  < 0.0001; R2 0.60). Conclusions: Surgeons can accurately obtain femoral anteversion by subtracting 7° from the angle taken between the anterior wall and the posterior femoral condyles or by adding 20° to the angle taken between the posterior wall and the posterior femoral condyles.


2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (8) ◽  
pp. 1087-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Barenius ◽  
C. Inngul ◽  
Z. Alagic ◽  
A. Enocson

Aims The aim of this study was to compare the functional and radiological outcomes in patients with a displaced fracture of the hip who were treated with a cemented or a cementless femoral stem. Patients and Methods A four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled study included 141 patients who underwent surgery for a displaced femoral neck fracture. Patients were randomized to receive either a cemented (n = 67) or a cementless (n = 74) stem at hemiarthroplasty (HA; n = 83) or total hip arthroplasty (THA; n = 58). Results Early differences in functional outcome, assessed using the Harris Hip Score, the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment score and EuroQol-5D, with better results in cemented group, deteriorated over time and there were no statistically significant differences at 48 months. Two (3%) patients in the cemented group and five (6.8%) in the cementless group underwent further surgery for a periprosthetic fracture. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.4). No patient underwent further surgery for instability or infection between one and four years postoperatively. The mortality and the radiological outcomes were similar in both groups. Conclusion Patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture treated with an arthroplasty using a cemented or cementless stem had good function and few complications up to four years postoperatively. However, due to the poor short-term functional outcomes in the cementless group, the findings do not support their routine use in the treatment of these elderly patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1087–93.


2010 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 359-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tenne ◽  
F. E. McGuigan ◽  
H. Ahlborg ◽  
P. Gerdhem ◽  
K. Åkesson

Bone ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 1131-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingze Zhang ◽  
Allison L. Kuipers ◽  
Laura M. Yerges-Armstrong ◽  
Cara S. Nestlerode ◽  
Zhao Jin ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 595-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rawad El Hage ◽  
Elie Moussa ◽  
Christophe Jacob

Bone ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. S342
Author(s):  
F. McGuigan⁎ ◽  
M. Tenne ◽  
H. Luthman ◽  
H. Ahlborg ◽  
K. Obrant ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Yung Yeung ◽  
Shang-Wen Tsai ◽  
Po-Kuei Wu ◽  
Cheng-Fong Chen ◽  
Ming-Chau Chang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Femoral neck fracture (FNF) is among the commonest fractures affecting the geriatric population. Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is a standard treatment procedure and has been performed by hip surgeons for decades. Recently, primary total hip replacement has proved advantageous for the treatment of such fractures. The aim of this study is to retrospectively review all causes of failure of all patients who underwent HA in our institute and reevaluated whether HA remains a favourable choice of treatment for patients with displaced FNFs.Methods: A total of 4516 patients underwent HA at our centre from 1998 to 2017. The HA implants included unipolar and bipolar prostheses. Patients diagnosed with displaced FNF, underwent primary HA initially, required second revision procedures, and followed up for a minimum of 36 months were included in this study. Data were collected and comprehensively analysed.Results: In 4516 cases, 99 patients underwent second surgeries. The revision rate was 2.19%. Reasons for failure were acetabular wear (n = 30, 30.3%), femoral stem subsidence (n = 24, 24.2%), periprosthetic fracture (n = 22, 22.2%), infection (n = 16, 16.2%), and recurrent dislocation (n = 7, 7.1%). The mean follow-up period was 78.1 months. The interval between failed HA and revision surgery was 22.8 months.Conclusion: HA has a low revision rate and remains a favourable choice of treatment for patients with displaced FNFs.Levels of Evidence: Level III, Retrospective Cohort Study, Therapeutic Study


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document