Extended Antibiotic Prophylaxis Confers No Benefit Following Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Controlled Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 2724-2729
Author(s):  
Feng-Chih Kuo ◽  
Arash Aalirezaie ◽  
Karan Goswami ◽  
Noam Shohat ◽  
Kier Blevins ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motoki Sonohata ◽  
Masaru Kitajima ◽  
Syunsuke Kawano ◽  
Masaaki Mawatari

The risk of periprosthetic joint infection from hematogenous bacterial seeding is increased in patients undergoing dental procedures that facilitate the development of bacteremia. We herein report the case of a patient without a history of dental procedures who suffered from an acute metastatic infection of a hip prosthesis by the oral bacterium Streptococcus mutans 18 months after undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. The patient was successfully treated by two-stage revision surgery. It is important to realize that the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis against joint infections has not yet been convincingly proven. As a result, optimal dental hygiene and regular dental visits may be more important than antibiotic prophylaxis for maintaining joint health. Therefore, orthopedic surgeons should educate patients with joint prostheses about good oral health.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 842-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad D. Watts ◽  
Matthew T. Houdek ◽  
Eric R. Wagner ◽  
David G. Lewallen ◽  
Tad M. Mabry

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amer Mohiuddin, BS ◽  
Justin Rice, BA ◽  
Mary Ziemba-Davis, BA ◽  
R. Michael Meneghini, MD

Background and Hypothesis: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI is a leading cause of failure after aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). While well documented in the primary setting, perioperative antibiotic duration is not well described in RTHA where the risk of PJI was recently reported to be 8% one-year post-revision. The study purpose was to evaluate whether extended oral antibiotic prophylactic protocol minimizes PJI in aseptic RTHA patients compared to the published literature.   Project Methods: 169 consecutive aseptic RTHAs performed with modern perioperative and infection-prevention protocols by a single surgeon at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. 80% of patients were discharged on 7-day oral antibiotic prophylaxis while intra-operative cultures were incubating. Infections and reoperations were documented.   Results: Average age and BMI were 63 years and 30 kg/m2.  67% percent of patients were ASA-III/IV, signifying the severity of comorbidities in this revision cohort. There we no cases of PJI in the 90-day postoperative period. Ninety-eight percent of cases were infection free at mean follow-up of 45 months. Three (1.8%) cases underwent reoperation for deep infection at 110, 161 and 581 days.    Conclusion and Potential Impact: Our observed infection rate of 0.0% is lower than published infection rates following RTHA and a 1.5% infection rate in primary THA in patients with no identifiable risk factors for PJI.  Based on this clinically meaningful decrease in PJI in this challenging cohort, we encourage further study regarding extended antibiotic protocol weighed appropriately against potential consequences.   


2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (2) ◽  
pp. 143-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bovonratwet ◽  
R. Malpani ◽  
T. D. Ottesen ◽  
V. Tyagi ◽  
N. T. Ondeck ◽  
...  

AimsThe aim of this study was to compare the rate of perioperative complications following aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients aged ≥ 80 years with that in those aged < 80 years, and to identify risk factors for the incidence of serious adverse events in those aged ≥ 80 years using a large validated national database.Patients and MethodsPatients who underwent aseptic revision THA were identified in the 2005 to 2015 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database and stratified into two age groups: those aged < 80 years and those aged ≥ 80 years. Preoperative and procedural characteristics were compared. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare the risk of postoperative complications and readmission. Risk factors for the development of a serious adverse event in those aged ≥ 80 years were characterized.ResultsThe study included 7569 patients aged < 80 years and 1419 were aged ≥ 80 years. Multivariate analysis showed a higher risk of perioperative mortality, pneumonia, urinary tract infection and the requirement for a blood transfusion and an extended length of stay in those aged ≥ 80 years compared with those aged < 80 years. Independent risk factors for the development of a serious adverse event in those aged ≥ 80 years include an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of ≥ 3 and procedures performed under general anaesthesia.ConclusionEven after controlling for patient and procedural characteristics, aseptic revision THA is associated with greater risks in patients aged ≥ 80 years compared with younger patients. This is important for counselling and highlights the need for medical optimization in these vulnerable patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:143–51.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 3673-3678
Author(s):  
Neil Pathak ◽  
Cynthia A. Kahlenberg ◽  
Harold G. Moore ◽  
Peter K. Sculco ◽  
Jonathan N. Grauer

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (10) ◽  
pp. 873-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew P. Abdel ◽  
Umberto Cottino ◽  
Dirk R. Larson ◽  
Arlen D. Hanssen ◽  
David G. Lewallen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 477-485
Author(s):  
Kavin Sundaram ◽  
Ahmed Siddiqi ◽  
Atul F. Kamath ◽  
Carlos A. Higuera-Rueda

Trochanteric osteotomy is a technique that allows expanded exposure and access to the femoral canal and acetabulum for a number of indications. There has been renewed interest in variants of this technique, including the trochanteric slide osteotomy (TSO), extended trochanter osteotomy (ETO), and the transfemoral approach, for both septic and aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Osteotomy fixation is crucial for achieving union, and wire and cable-plate systems are the most common techniques. TSO involves the creation of a greater trochanter fragment with preserved abductor attachment proximally and vastus lateralis attachment distally. This technique may be particularly useful in the setting of abductor deficiency or when augmented acetabular exposure is needed. ETO is a posterior-laterally based extensile approach that has been successfully utilized for aseptic and septic indications; most series report a greater than 90% rate of union. The transfemoral approach, as known as the Wagner osteotomy, is an extensile femoral approach and is more anterior-based than the alternate posterior-based ETO. It may be particularly useful for anterior-based approaches and anterior femoral remodelling; rates of union after this approach in most reports have been close to 100%. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:477-485. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190063


Author(s):  
Tony S. Shen ◽  
Alex Gu ◽  
Patawut Bovonratwet ◽  
Nathaniel T. Ondeck ◽  
Peter K. Sculco ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document