Mitral Valve Morphology Assessment: Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography Versus Computed Tomography

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 1922-1929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Shanks ◽  
Victoria Delgado ◽  
Arnold C.T. Ng ◽  
Frank van der Kley ◽  
Joanne D. Schuijf ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1342-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirian M. Pardi ◽  
Pablo M. A. Pomerantzeff ◽  
Roney Orismar Sampaio ◽  
Maria C. Abduch ◽  
Carlos M. A. Brandão ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 649
Author(s):  
Kensuke Hirasawa ◽  
N. Mai Vo ◽  
Tea Gegenava ◽  
Stephan Milhorini Pio ◽  
Suzanne E. van Wijngaarden ◽  
...  

The aim of this study is to evaluate the agreement between three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for assessing mitral annular (MA) dimensions. A total of 105 patients (79 ± 9 years old, 52% male) who underwent clinically indicated 3D TEE and MDCT feasible for MA geometrical assessment were included. Using dedicated semi-automated postprocessing software, MA geometry, including mitral annular area (MAA), perimeter, septal-lateral (SL) diameter, and inter-trigonal (TT) diameter, was evaluated using 3D TEE and MDCT. Compared to 3D TEE, MAA, perimeter, and SL distance measured on MDCT data were larger (9.9 ± 3.0 vs. 9.3 ± 3.1 cm2 for MAA; 115 ± 18 vs. 108 ± 18 mm for perimeter; and 35 ± 5 vs. 32 ± 5 cm for SL distance, all p < 0.001). By contrast, the TT distance was comparable between MDCT and 3D TEE (26 ± 4 vs. 26 ± 4 cm, p = 0.258). The correlations of all the MA dimensions were good to excellent between the two modalities (R = 0.911 for MAA, 0.890 for perimeter, 0.739 for TT distance, and 0.857 for SL distance, respectively, all p < 0.001). This study showed good agreement between 3D TEE- and MDCT-derived MA measurements although MDCT systematically provided larger MAA, perimeter, and SL distance compared with 3D TEE.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramez Morcos ◽  
Haider Al Taii ◽  
Priya Bansal ◽  
Joel Casale ◽  
Rupesh Manam ◽  
...  

Periprocedural imaging assessment for percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) transcatheter occlusion can be obtained by utilizing different imaging modalities including fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound imaging. Given the complex and variable morphology of the left atrial appendage, it is crucial to obtain the most accurate LAA dimensions to prevent intra-procedural device changes, recapture maneuvers, and prolonged procedure time. We therefore sought to examine the accuracy of the most commonly utilized imaging modalities in LAA occlusion. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was waived as we only reviewed published data. By utilizing PUBMED which is an integrated online website to list the published literature based on its relevance, we retrieved thirty-two articles on the accuracy of most commonly used imaging modalities for pre-procedural assessment of the left atrial appendage morphology, namely, two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, and three-dimensional printing. There is strong evidence that real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography is more accurate than two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Three-dimensional computed tomography has recently emerged as an imaging modality and it showed exceptional accuracy when merged with three-dimensional printing technology. However, real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography may be considered the preferred imaging modality as it can provide accurate measurements without requiring radiation exposure or contrast administration. We will present the most common imaging modality used for LAA assessment and will provide an algorithmic approach including preprocedural, periprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural.


2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1131-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayaprakash Manda ◽  
Saritha Kumari Kesanolla ◽  
Ming Chon Hsuing ◽  
Navin C. Nanda ◽  
Elsayed Abo-Salem ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iri Kupferwasser ◽  
Susanne Mohr-Kahaly ◽  
Thomas Menzel ◽  
Martin Spiecker ◽  
Guido Dohmen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 803-804
Author(s):  
Ana Gabaldón-Pérez ◽  
Rafael De la Espriella ◽  
Hector Merenciano-Gonzalez ◽  
Enrique Santas ◽  
Francisco J. Chorro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document