Combination of Flow Reversal and Distal Filter for Cerebral Protection during Carotid Artery Stenting

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Harada ◽  
Kousuke Kakumoto ◽  
Jun Morioka ◽  
Tarou Saito ◽  
Kouzou Fukuyama
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Flow Reversal ◽  
Cerebral Protection ◽  
Distal Filter

scholarly journals TCT-551 Randomized Comparison of Flow Reversal vs Distal Filter for Cerebral Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients With Stable Carotid Disease

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. B162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Pacchioni ◽  
Antonio Mugnolo ◽  
Sepideh Torabi Parizi ◽  
Francesco Versaci ◽  
Salvatore Saccà ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Flow Reversal ◽  
Cerebral Protection ◽  
Carotid Disease ◽  
Distal Filter

scholarly journals Carotid Artery Stenting with Double Cerebral Protection Using Distal Filter and Proximal Embolic Protection Devices

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-196
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro NAKAGAWA ◽  
Norihito FUKAWA ◽  
Kiyoshi TSUJI ◽  
Norihiro IWAKURA ◽  
Tomonari YABUUCHI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Cerebral Protection ◽  
Embolic Protection ◽  
Protection Devices ◽  
Distal Filter

Comparison of periprocedural and long term outcomes of proximal versus distal cerebral protection method during carotid artery stenting

VASA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeynep Bastug Gul ◽  
Emre Akkaya ◽  
Ertan Vuruskan ◽  
Ozgur Akgul ◽  
Hamdi Pusuroglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Cerebral Protection ◽  
Protection System ◽  
One Year ◽  
Distal Filter ◽  
Flow Blockage

Abstract. Background: The aim of this study was to assess the periprocedural and one-year outcomes of two different cerebral protection systems used during carotid artery stenting (CAS). Patients and methods: We enrolled 90 consecutive patients with carotid artery stenosis who underwent CAS with a proximal flow blockage protection system (mean age 69.7 ± 8) or distal protection with a filter (mean age 70.8 ± 7). Results: CAS was performed successively on 89 patients (99 %). Adverse events were defined as major stroke, minor stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction, and death. Two strokes, one TIA, one death, and one myocardial infarction were observed in-hospital. There were no significant differences in safety or benefits between the proximal flow blockage embolic protection system (n = 45) and the distal filter protection system (n = 45) in terms of clinically apparent cerebral embolism, TIA, death, or myocardial infarction during the periprocedural stage or during the one-year follow-up period. Conclusions: Although it has been shown that the proximal flow blockage cerebral protection system decreases the risk of silent cerebral embolism, it has no advantage over the distal filter protection system in terms of adverse cerebrovascular or cardiac events during the periprocedural stage or during the long-term follow-up period.

Carotid artery stenting with routine cerebral protection in high-risk patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 188 (6) ◽  
pp. 644-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter H. Lin ◽  
Ruth L. Bush ◽  
Dieter F. Lubbe ◽  
Mitchell M. Cox ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Cerebral Protection ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document