scholarly journals A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Remestemcel-L versus Placebo Added to Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 835-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Partow Kebriaei ◽  
Jack Hayes ◽  
Andrew Daly ◽  
Joseph Uberti ◽  
David I. Marks ◽  
...  
Transfusion ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 1045-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Worel ◽  
Elisabeth Lehner ◽  
Harald Führer ◽  
Peter Kalhs ◽  
Werner Rabitsch ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3424-3424
Author(s):  
LaQuisa Hill ◽  
Rima M Saliba ◽  
Julianne Chen ◽  
Gabriela Rondon ◽  
Muzaffar H. Qazilbash ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CMI) at the time of transplant has previously been shown to predict the development of grade 3/4 acute GVHD (aGHVD) and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) for patients with a high CMI (≥3). It has been postulated that inflammatory cytokines associated with many of the conditions accounted for in the CMI may contribute to GVHD development, severity, and ultimately mortality. Because of concerns for corticosteroid toxicities in frail or elderly patients, some clinicians will attempt to rapidly taper steroid doses. We hypothesized that patients with a high CMI and/or advanced age (>60 yo) are treated differently with respect to systemic steroids, and this results in a higher likelihood of progression to more severe aGVHD, increases the need for second-line GVHD therapy, and increases NRM. In order to test this hypothesis, we examined steroid tapering patterns in patients who received systemic steroids for aGVHD in order to determine the influence of age and/or CMI on the rate of taper, and whether this impacted treatment outcome. Methods Patients who underwent a first allogeneic HCT at MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively identified in our HCT database. All patients ≥18 years old that developed aGVHD in the first 100 days and required systemic therapy were evaluated. Detailed information on GVHD therapy, steroid tapering, indication for taper, response, and outcomes were collected retrospectively from the medical records using standard criteria. Competing risks analyses were used to estimate the incidence of second line therapy and NRM, and to evaluate predictors of early (≤5 days) taper, need for second line therapy, and non-relapse mortality. Incidence of second line therapy and NRM were estimated in landmark analysis starting on the date of initial taper. Results A total of 417 patients met the eligibility criteria for this analysis (Table 1). Median age of patients was 53 (range 18-75; 28% >60 yo), median CMI was 1 (0-10). Grade of aGVHD at the initiation of therapy was ≤ 2 in 87% of patients and grade 3/4 in 13% of patients with a median time to initiation of therapy of 2 days (0-58). The time from aGVHD diagnosis to initiation of therapy, initial aGVHD grade, and median starting steroid dose, (mg/kg/day) in methylpred equivalents, were comparable in patients ≤60 yo vs >60 yo (Table 1). However CMI>3 was higher in patients >60 yo as would be expected. The median time to initial taper was 5 days (1-26). Predictors for early taper (≤ 5 days) on multivariate analysis included CMI>3 in patients older than 60 yo (HR=1.6, p=0.02) and starting steroid dose >1.5 mg/kg/day (HR=1.5, p=0.001). In the subset of patients with grade 2-4 aGVHD (N=276) who were initially tapered for response, the median steroid dose on day 14 was significantly lower in patients >60 yo with a CMI>3 (0.4 [range 0.05-1.5] vs 0.7 [range 0-9]; p= 0.02) in all other patients. In responding patients, early taper was significantly predictive for cumulative incidence of second line therapy within the first month from the time of first taper (14% vs 6%, HR=2.5, p=0.04). The highest incidence of second line therapy (29%) was in patients >60 yo with CMI>3 who were tapered within the first 5 days (HR 2.8, CI 1.03-7.5, p=0.04). Importantly, none of the patients >60 yo with CMI>3 (n=8) who were tapered after 5 days required second line therapy (n=8). In patients >60 yo with CMI>3, those who were tapered early had a 6-month NRM of 47% vs 25% in those tapered after 5 days (p= 0.1). Conclusions These results confirm earlier reports implicating the impact of a high CMI at the time of transplant on aGVHD-related mortality. Our data offers evidence that tapering practices differ according to age and CMI and that this directly impacts GVHD outcomes. Investigating alternative (steroid sparing) strategies to prevent under-treatment of aGVHD is thus essential to improving survival outcomes in these patients. Disclosures Ciurea: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board; Cyto-Sen Therapeutics: Equity Ownership.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Drexler ◽  
Andreas Buser ◽  
Laura Infanti ◽  
Gregor Stehle ◽  
Joerg Halter ◽  
...  

Background and Summary: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a leukapheresis-based procedure used in the therapy of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD, cGvHD) and other diseases. Based on the substantial efficacy and the excellent safety profile in the absence of immunosuppression ECP has established itself as a major treatment form for steroid-refractory GvHD. Here we review the current literature on ECP as a treatment option for patients with aGvHD as well as cGvHD. Key Messages: ECP is a well-established second-line therapy for cGvHD. Its role in the treatment of aGvHD is less clear but also points towards an effective second-line therapy option. In the future ECP could play a role in the prevention of GvHD. More experimental and randomized controlled trials are needed to define the best patient selection criteria, settings, and therapy regimens for GvHD.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5724-5724
Author(s):  
Zhiping Fan ◽  
Lan Deng ◽  
Xudong Li ◽  
Qing Zhang ◽  
Li Xuan ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To explore the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in the treatment of steroid refractory/refractory acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD). Methods A prospective analysis was conducted in the 31 steroid refractory/refractory aGVHD cases who treated with ruxolitinib from October 2017 to June 2018. The first dose of ruxolitinib was 5-10mg bid, and the dose was adjusted to 5mg qd for maintenance treatment when complete remission (CR) status lasted for 2 weeks after steroid refractory/refractory aGVHD turned into CR. Results Of all the 29 steroid refractory/refractory aGVHD patients, 15 patients were treated with ruxolitinib in case of disease progression after receiving at least one second-line treatment, and 14 cases directly with ruxolitinib after the occurrence of corticosteroid refractoriness. The time of starting ruxolitinib treatment after the occurrence of aGVHD was 10 (4-81) d, the median time of onset was 8 (3-18) d. The overall response rate was 89.6% (26/29) including 22 complete responses (75.9%), and 4 partial responses (13.8%). 12 patients with thrombocytopenia need to reduce the dose of ruxolitinib, and 1 patient withdrew treatment for obvious bleeding tendency. With the median follow-up 3 (2-8) months after treatment with ruxolitinib, 28 patients survived and 1 died of severe pneumonia related to aGVHD, and the overall survival was 96.6% (28/29). Conclusion Ruxolitinib is safe and effective in the treatment of steroid refractory/refractory aGVHD, and can be used as a second-line treatment for refractory aGVHD. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1262-1262
Author(s):  
Melissa Sanacore ◽  
Karen Manion ◽  
Pauline Smith ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
H. Kent Holland ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1262 Steroid-refractory acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) is associated with a poor prognosis. Although clinical responses occur to second line therapy they are associated with high rates of infection and dismal long-term survival. Blockade at 2 different points in the cytokine cascade with infliximab and daclizumab (double antibody therapy, DAT), along with aggressive infection prophylaxis may improve outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed our experience using DAT in steroid-refractory aGVHD. Between December 2005 and December 2009, 22 patients were treated of which 20 are evaluable. All patients had persistent or progressive aGVHD despite 1–2 mg/kg/d steroids for a median of 9 days (range 2–55). Five patients had failed 2nd line systemic aGVHD therapy and 1 patient failed 3rd line therapy prior to DAT. Combination therapy was given for aGVHD grade 2 (n=3), 3 (n=13), or 4 (n=4). GVHD involved the skin in 7 patients, the liver in 9 patients and GI tract in 16 patients. The median age at time of therapy was 55 years (range 29–69). Grafts were from HLA identical siblings (9), 10 locus matched unrelated donors (5), 9/10 locus matched unrelated donors (3), cord blood (2) or 5/10 haploidentical donor (1). The conditioning regimen was myeloablative in 10 patients, and either nonmyeloablative or reduced intensity in 10 patients. Indications for stem cell transplant were acute leukemia (7), chronic myelogenous leukemia (2), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (1), myelodysplastic syndrome (4), non-Hodgkins lymphoma (5), and multiple myeloma (1). Most patients received methotrexate (MTX) with tacrolimus (FK)(14) or mycophenolate (MMF) (4) for GVHD prophylaxis; one patient received MTX with FK and MMF and one FK alone. Fifteen patients developed aGVHD after the primary transplant and five after donor lymphocyte infusion. Daclizumab was given (1mg/kg) day 1,4,8,15, and 22, and infliximab (10mg/kg) days 1,8,15, and 22. Steroid therapy was aggressively tapered upon commencement of DAT. Maximal response achieved by day 60 post initiation of therapy was assessed. Five pts (25%) attained a CR (resolution of all symptoms), 10 (50%) PR (improvement in ≥ 1 organ & no progression in others), 2(10%) MR (improvement in ≥ 1 organ & deterioration or new symptoms in others) and 3 (15%) no response. Five patients received 1–2 additional courses of DAT at a median of 60 days. Three patients (15%) were concurrently on an investigational protocol utilizing mesenchymal stem cells. All patients received antifungal (azole with mold coverage or echinocandin), anti-Herpes virus, and Pneumocystis prophylaxis. Patients with gastrointestinal GVHD also received antibacterial prophylaxis irrespective of neutropenia. Patients were monitored once or twice weekly for CMV reactivation and received preemptive therapy upon reactivation. Only two patients had documented fungal infections: Mucormycosis in 1 and Candida parapsilosis in 1. Sixteen (80%) of patients had bacterial infections, including 21 gram-positive infections and 13 gram-negative infections. Viral infections, primarily CMV reactivation, occurred in 16 patients (80%). As of August 2010, 12 patients have died after a median of 102 days from initiation of DAT (range 14–658) (5 from relapsed or progressive disease, 3 from aGVHD, 2 from cGVHD, and 2 from organ failure). With a median follow up of 511 days for living patients, the estimated probability of survival at 6 months and 12 months is 55% and 50%, respectively. DAT is an effective therapy for steroid-refractory aGVHD. Survival beyond 6 months can be achieved in approximately half the patients using this strategy. Aggressive antifungal and antiviral prophylaxis may have contributed to this outcome. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Infliximab and daclizumab are not FDA approved for GVHD.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4878-4878
Author(s):  
Yuan Suo ◽  
Jiapei Liu ◽  
Yiming Sun ◽  
Qiaoyuan Wu ◽  
Hua Jin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is the major cause of non-relapse morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(allo-HSCT). But only 40% of the patients will respond to first-line therapies Corticosteroids. Ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, reduces the incidence and severity of GVHD while preserving graft-versus-leukemia effects in preclinical models. The retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of ruxolitinib compared with other second-line therapies for steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD) in a single-center. Methods A total of 90 patients who developed SR-aGVHD after HSCT were evaluated in this retrospective study.They were treated with ruxolitinib (n=45) or other salvage-therapies (n=45) including MTX, basiliximab, etanercept and MSC at our institution. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) at Day 28. Additional endpoints included overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence rates of failure-free survival (FFS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM) and cGVHD. Treatment failure was defined as 1) addition of new systemic therapy for aGVHD, 2) NRM, 3) relapse, 4) progression of hematologic disease. FFS and OS were calculated from the day of starting the use of second-line treatments for aGVHD. Results The median age was 34 years (range 14-69). At the time of enrollment 25 patients had grade Ⅱ disease, 39 with grade Ⅲ disease, 26 with grade IV disease. The skin was involved in 54.4%, lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract in 78.9% and liver in 20.2%. With a median follow-up of 1.33 years, the ORR at day 28 was higher in ruxolitinib group than non-ruxolitinib group (62.2% [95% CI, 47.5%-77.0%] vs. 26.7% [95% CI, 13.2%-40.1%], P=0.001) (Table 1). The 1-year OS was 64.4 % and 45.5% in the two groups, respectively (P=0.0382). Ruxolitinib treatment also improved the 1-year cumulative incidence of FFS (57.8% vs. 26.6%, P=0.002), while the 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse did not differ significantly (9.6% vs. 20.0%, P=0.195). The 1-year cumulative incidence of NRM was lower in the ruxolitinib group than the non-ruxolitinib group (24.4% vs. 45.3%, P=0.023). The 1-year and 3-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD were 17.8% vs. 33.3% and 26.8% vs. 44.4% between the ruxolitinib group and non-ruxolitinib group (P=0.10 and P=0.04). Conclusions Our study demonstrated that ruxolitinib is effective than other second-line treatments in patients with SR-aGVHD due to the higher response rates and the improvement of prognosis. Furthermore, ruxolitinib could reduce the incidence and severity of chronic GVHD in aGVHD patients. Keywords: Ruxolitinib; Steroid-refractory; Acute graft-versus-host disease; Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document