scholarly journals Extracorporeal Photopheresis in Graft-versus-Host Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Drexler ◽  
Andreas Buser ◽  
Laura Infanti ◽  
Gregor Stehle ◽  
Joerg Halter ◽  
...  

Background and Summary: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a leukapheresis-based procedure used in the therapy of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD, cGvHD) and other diseases. Based on the substantial efficacy and the excellent safety profile in the absence of immunosuppression ECP has established itself as a major treatment form for steroid-refractory GvHD. Here we review the current literature on ECP as a treatment option for patients with aGvHD as well as cGvHD. Key Messages: ECP is a well-established second-line therapy for cGvHD. Its role in the treatment of aGvHD is less clear but also points towards an effective second-line therapy option. In the future ECP could play a role in the prevention of GvHD. More experimental and randomized controlled trials are needed to define the best patient selection criteria, settings, and therapy regimens for GvHD.

Transfusion ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 1045-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Worel ◽  
Elisabeth Lehner ◽  
Harald Führer ◽  
Peter Kalhs ◽  
Werner Rabitsch ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3424-3424
Author(s):  
LaQuisa Hill ◽  
Rima M Saliba ◽  
Julianne Chen ◽  
Gabriela Rondon ◽  
Muzaffar H. Qazilbash ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CMI) at the time of transplant has previously been shown to predict the development of grade 3/4 acute GVHD (aGHVD) and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) for patients with a high CMI (≥3). It has been postulated that inflammatory cytokines associated with many of the conditions accounted for in the CMI may contribute to GVHD development, severity, and ultimately mortality. Because of concerns for corticosteroid toxicities in frail or elderly patients, some clinicians will attempt to rapidly taper steroid doses. We hypothesized that patients with a high CMI and/or advanced age (>60 yo) are treated differently with respect to systemic steroids, and this results in a higher likelihood of progression to more severe aGVHD, increases the need for second-line GVHD therapy, and increases NRM. In order to test this hypothesis, we examined steroid tapering patterns in patients who received systemic steroids for aGVHD in order to determine the influence of age and/or CMI on the rate of taper, and whether this impacted treatment outcome. Methods Patients who underwent a first allogeneic HCT at MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively identified in our HCT database. All patients ≥18 years old that developed aGVHD in the first 100 days and required systemic therapy were evaluated. Detailed information on GVHD therapy, steroid tapering, indication for taper, response, and outcomes were collected retrospectively from the medical records using standard criteria. Competing risks analyses were used to estimate the incidence of second line therapy and NRM, and to evaluate predictors of early (≤5 days) taper, need for second line therapy, and non-relapse mortality. Incidence of second line therapy and NRM were estimated in landmark analysis starting on the date of initial taper. Results A total of 417 patients met the eligibility criteria for this analysis (Table 1). Median age of patients was 53 (range 18-75; 28% >60 yo), median CMI was 1 (0-10). Grade of aGVHD at the initiation of therapy was ≤ 2 in 87% of patients and grade 3/4 in 13% of patients with a median time to initiation of therapy of 2 days (0-58). The time from aGVHD diagnosis to initiation of therapy, initial aGVHD grade, and median starting steroid dose, (mg/kg/day) in methylpred equivalents, were comparable in patients ≤60 yo vs >60 yo (Table 1). However CMI>3 was higher in patients >60 yo as would be expected. The median time to initial taper was 5 days (1-26). Predictors for early taper (≤ 5 days) on multivariate analysis included CMI>3 in patients older than 60 yo (HR=1.6, p=0.02) and starting steroid dose >1.5 mg/kg/day (HR=1.5, p=0.001). In the subset of patients with grade 2-4 aGVHD (N=276) who were initially tapered for response, the median steroid dose on day 14 was significantly lower in patients >60 yo with a CMI>3 (0.4 [range 0.05-1.5] vs 0.7 [range 0-9]; p= 0.02) in all other patients. In responding patients, early taper was significantly predictive for cumulative incidence of second line therapy within the first month from the time of first taper (14% vs 6%, HR=2.5, p=0.04). The highest incidence of second line therapy (29%) was in patients >60 yo with CMI>3 who were tapered within the first 5 days (HR 2.8, CI 1.03-7.5, p=0.04). Importantly, none of the patients >60 yo with CMI>3 (n=8) who were tapered after 5 days required second line therapy (n=8). In patients >60 yo with CMI>3, those who were tapered early had a 6-month NRM of 47% vs 25% in those tapered after 5 days (p= 0.1). Conclusions These results confirm earlier reports implicating the impact of a high CMI at the time of transplant on aGVHD-related mortality. Our data offers evidence that tapering practices differ according to age and CMI and that this directly impacts GVHD outcomes. Investigating alternative (steroid sparing) strategies to prevent under-treatment of aGVHD is thus essential to improving survival outcomes in these patients. Disclosures Ciurea: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board; Cyto-Sen Therapeutics: Equity Ownership.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S573-S573
Author(s):  
Nida Ashraf ◽  
Ajoy Dias ◽  
Lisa A Clough ◽  
Yonghui Ni ◽  
Prabhakar Chalise ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), is a cell-based immune-modulatory therapy used in the treatment of steroid refractory chronic graft versus host disease (cGHVD). It is unclear whether ECP is associated with an increased risk of infections compared to alternative treatment. We aimed to study the infectious complications in patients who are on ECP post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT). Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with cGVHD post alloHSCT who were initiated on ECP or second line immunosuppressive agents (SLIS). The study period was from March 1, 2014 to October 1, 2018. Each subject in the ECP arm was matched to the SLIS arm according to gender, age, underlying disease, and date of diagnosis of cGVHD. All subjects were followed for one-year post treatment. The main outcome was incidence of each type of infection (event rate/ person-years). Kaplan Meier analysis was used, evaluating time to infection with log rank test. The spectrum of infectious complications was described. Results Seventy-seven patients were included (36 in ECP and 41 in SLIS arm). Median age was 57.4 years (18.1 -73.4), and 59.7% of patients were male. The most common underlying diseases were acute myeloid leukemia (45.4%), myelodysplastic syndrome (20.8%) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (15.6%). A total occurrence of 94 infections was observed in the ECP arm, compared to 118 in SLIS arm. Bacterial infections accounted for majority of the infections in ECP arm (50%) compared to SLIS arm in which viruses were most common (49.2%). Bacterial pneumonia was the most common clinical syndrome (34% and 27.3%, in the ECP and SLIS arms, respectively). Bacteremia accounted for 12.8% of infections in the ECP arm compared to 16.4% in the SLIS arm. There was no difference in the event rates of infections among the two groups [2.58/ person-years in ECP group vs 3.60/person-years, p = 0.3766], or the probability of infection at any time between the ECP and SLIS group on Kaplan Meier (log rank test, p-value=0.36)(Figure 1). Kaplan-Meier plot of time to the earliest infection diagnosis between ECP and control group Conclusion Bacterial and viral pneumonia were the most common infections in patients undergoing ECP. Overall, ECP does not confer an increased risk of infectious complications compared to second line IS agents. Disclosures Wissam El Atrouni, MD, ViiV (Advisor or Review Panel member)


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. S297-S298
Author(s):  
Zachary J Sebghati ◽  
Haitham Abdelhakim ◽  
Anurag K Singh ◽  
Leyla Shune ◽  
Siddhartha Ganguly ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document