scholarly journals Antidepressant actions of melatonin and melatonin receptor agonist: Focus on pathophysiology and treatment

2021 ◽  
pp. 113724
Author(s):  
WANG Ye-qing ◽  
JIANG Ya-jie ◽  
ZOU Man-shu ◽  
Liu Jian ◽  
ZHAO Hong-qing ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 802
Author(s):  
Xiu-ping LI ◽  
Shi-chang CAI ◽  
Wei-dong YIN ◽  
Su-jun ZHANG ◽  
Rong HU ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110020
Author(s):  
Natasha Romero ◽  
Kevin M. Dube ◽  
Kenneth E. Lupi ◽  
Jeremy R. DeGrado

Background: An impaired sleep-wake cycle may be one factor that affects the development of delirium in critically ill patients. Several small studies suggest that exogenous melatonin or ramelteon may decrease the incidence and/or duration of delirium. Objective: To compare the effect of prophylactic administration of melatonin, ramelteon, or no melatonin receptor agonist on the development of delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study of nondelirious patients in the ICU who received melatonin, ramelteon, or no melatonin receptor agonist. The primary end point was the incidence of delirium. Secondary end points included assessments of daily level of sedation and daily utilization of antipsychotic, sedative, and opioid agents. Results: No difference was observed in the incidence of delirium among the melatonin, ramelteon, and placebo cohorts (18.7% vs 14.3% vs 13.8%; P = 0.77). A difference was observed in the rate of agitation and sedation among the 3 groups, with the greatest observed in the melatonin cohort. Additionally, there was a difference in the use of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and opioids. Overall, there was no difference in clinical outcomes, including duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU or hospital length of stay. Conclusion and Relevance: Therapy with melatonin, ramelteon, and no melatonin receptor agonist resulted in similar rates of delirium in a mixed ICU population. Despite significant differences in agitation, sedation, and medication utilization, there was no differences in the clinical outcomes evaluated.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Fenoglio-Simeone ◽  
Andrey Mazarati ◽  
Sepideh Sefidvash-Hockley ◽  
Don Shin ◽  
Julianne Wilke ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-19
Author(s):  
Supriyo Saha ◽  
Mrityunjoy Acharya ◽  
Prinsa

QSAR analysis was performed using 20 MT1 agonist and 18 MT2 agonist. MODI was 0.6373 in case of MT1 agonist and 0.6299 in case of MT2 agonist. QSAR model for MT1 receptor agonist was pKd = 16.24793(+/- 0.93539) +1.0924(+/-0.18831) ALogP -0.11399(+/-0.01383) apol +0.59876(+/-0.16599) C2SP3 -10.29435(+/-2.81413) E3p and for MT2 receptor agonist was pKd = 6.38692(+/-0.91098) +0.87139(+/-0.20258) ALogP -0.0351(+/-0.00542) AMR +3.33079 (+/-0.80377) SpMin6_Bhm +146.76208(+/-28.14492) VE2_Dt with statistical parameter as Q^2:0.79167, r^2 :0.88878, |r0^2-r'0^2|:0.04633,k:1.03159, [(r^2-r0^2)/r^2]:0.01013, k':0.96695, [(r^2- '0^2)/r^2]:0.06226 and Q^2:0.81401, r^2:0.97384, |r0^2-r'0^2|:0.1039, k:0.98543, [(r^2-r0^2)/r^2]:0.08048, k':1.01351, [(r^2-r'0^2)/r^2]:0.18717 respectively; comply with the Golbraikh and Tropsha acceptable model criteria. The results from MLR Y Randomization test in case of MT1 agonist was cRp^2: 0.7665 and MT2 agonist was cRp^2: 0.7284. Applicability domain were identified by Euclidean and Mahalanobis Distance Method. Finally it was clear that all the predicted data are inside the area of observed data points and also some data are purely overlapped.Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. 15(1): 7-19, 2016 (June)


2020 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 127-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Lewandowska ◽  
Marta A. Małkiewicz ◽  
Mariusz Siemiński ◽  
Wiesław J. Cubała ◽  
Paweł J. Winklewski ◽  
...  

Xenobiotica ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1138-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Zhu ◽  
Yueqing Hu ◽  
Maurice K. C Ho ◽  
Yung H. Wong

2003 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 760-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nimish N. Vachharajani ◽  
Krishnaswamy Yeleswaram ◽  
David W. Boulton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document