scholarly journals Chemical incidents

BJA Education ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.P.B. Sen ◽  
R. Sandhu ◽  
S. Bland
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-Long Li ◽  
Wen-Jun Tang ◽  
Ya-Kun Ma ◽  
Ji-Min Jia ◽  
Rong-Li Dang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Collins ◽  
Natalie Williams ◽  
Felicity Southworth ◽  
Thomas James ◽  
Louise Davidson ◽  
...  

Abstract The Initial Operational Response (IOR) to chemical incidents is a suite of rapid strategies including evacuation, disrobe and improvised and interim decontamination. IOR and Specialist Operational Response (SOR) decontamination protocols involving mass decontamination units would be conducted in sequence by UK emergency services following a chemical incident, to allow for safe onward transfer of casualties. As part of a series of human volunteer studies, we examined the effectiveness of IOR and SOR decontamination procedures alone and in sequence. Specifically, we evaluated the additional contribution of SOR, when following improvised and interim decontamination. Two simulants, methyl salicylate (MeS) with vegetable oil and benzyl salicylate (BeS), were applied to participants’ skin. Participants underwent improvised dry, improvised wet, interim wet, specialist decontamination and a no decontamination control. Skin analysis and UV photography indicated significantly lower levels of both simulants remaining following decontamination compared to controls. There were no significant differences in MeS levels recovered between decontamination conditions. Analysis of BeS, a more persistent simulant than MeS, showed that recovery from skin was significantly reduced following combined IOR with SOR than IOR alone. These results show modest additional benefits of decontamination interventions conducted in sequence, particularly for persistent chemicals, supporting current UK operational procedures.


1995 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 694-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
P J Baxter ◽  
B J Heap ◽  
M G Rowland ◽  
V S Murray

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Melnikova ◽  
Jennifer Wu ◽  
Alice Yang ◽  
Maureen Orr

AbstractIntroductionFirst responders, including firefighters, police officers, emergency medical services, and company emergency response team members, have dangerous jobs that can bring them in contact with hazardous chemicals among other dangers. Limited information is available on responder injuries that occur during hazardous chemical incidents.MethodsWe analyzed 2002-2012 data on acute chemical incidents with injured responders from 2 Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry chemical incident surveillance programs. To learn more about such injuries, we performed descriptive analysis and looked for trends.ResultsThe percentage of responders among all injured people in chemical incidents has not changed over the years. Firefighters were the most frequently injured group of responders, followed by police officers. Respiratory system problems were the most often reported injury, and the respiratory irritants, ammonia, methamphetamine-related chemicals, and carbon monoxide were the chemicals more often associated with injuries. Most of the incidents with responder injuries were caused by human error or equipment failure. Firefighters wore personal protective equipment (PPE) most frequently and police officers did so rarely. Police officers’ injuries were mostly associated with exposure to ammonia and methamphetamine-related chemicals. Most responders did not receive basic awareness-level hazardous material training.ConclusionAll responders should have at least basic awareness-level hazardous material training to recognize and avoid exposure. Research on improving firefighter PPE should continue. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:211–221)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document