scholarly journals Evaluation of postoperative patient satisfaction after covering the nasal dorsum with upper lateral cartilage: “upper lateral closing”

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Can Alper Çağıcı
2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Gamal Khafagy ◽  
Hesham Abdelaty El-Sersy ◽  
Ahmed Mahmoud Maarouf

Abstract Background The smooth and straight nasal dorsum is a goal after nasal hump reduction as dorsal irregularities are unexpectable and inevitable complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate modified perichondrial-periosteal flaps functionally and aesthetically to camouflage nasal dorsal irregularities. A total of 115 patients with nasal humps were enrolled in the study. The perichondrium over the upper lateral cartilages is divided in the midline and dissected forming two laterally based flaps while the periosteum over the nasal bones is dissected superiorly. After completion of all rhinoplasty steps, the flaps were repositioned and sutured as a separate layer. Follow-up for 2 years with an assessment of irregularities of the nasal dorsum, collapse of the upper lateral cartilage, and nasal breathing. Results Aesthetically, no nasal dorsal irregularities were noticed. Also, no patients complained of nasal obstruction. Conclusion The modified perichondrial-periosteal flap is a successful technique, functionally and aesthetically. It avoids the appearance of dorsal irregularities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (01) ◽  
pp. 045-052
Author(s):  
Mario Bazanelli Junqueira Ferraz ◽  
Guilherme Constante Preis Sella

AbstractNasal dorsal preservation surgery was described more than 100 years ago, but recently has gained prominence. Our objective is to show the surgical technique, the main indications and counterindications, and the complications. It is a technique that does not cause the detachment of the upper lateral cartilage (ULC) from the nasal septum, and has the main following sequence: preparation of the septum and its resection can be at different levels (high or low, i.e., SPAR [septum pyramidal adjustment and repositioning] A or B); preparation of the pyramid; transversal osteotomy; lateral osteotomy(s); and septopyramidal adjustment. The result is a nose with a lower radix than the original, a deprojection of the nasal dorsum tending to maintain its original shape; an increase in the interalar distance (IAD) and enlargement of the nasal middle ⅓; and loss of projection of the nasal tip and roundness of the nostrils. Thus, the ideal candidate is the one who benefits from such side effects, that is: tension nose, that is, high radix with projected dorsum, projected anterior nasal septal angle (ANSA), narrow middle ⅓, narrow IAD, thin nostrils and straight perpendicular plate of the ethmoid (PPE), and, depending on the characteristics, the deviated nose. The counterindications are low radix, irregularities in the nasal dorsum, ANSA lower than rhinion, and a wide middle ⅓. And the main stigmas are: a nose with a very low radix, middle ⅓ enlarged, residual hump, and saddling of the supratip area. Other issues of this technique are: the shape of the radix; the need or not to remove PPE; wide dorsum; irregular dorsum; ANSA lower than rhinion; weak cartilages; long nasal bone; deviated PPE; and obsessive patient. We conclude that this is a great technique for noses with characteristics suitable to it; care must be taken with the stigmas it can cause.


Author(s):  
Diego Arancibia Tagle ◽  
Jose Carlos Neves ◽  
Alwyn D'Souza

AbstractThe correction and management of the nasal hump has been a classic problem in rhinoplasty since the beginning of the aesthetic purpose of this surgery. For many years, the resective technique described by Joseph has been the battle horse to solve this problem but it has several drawbacks if not done properly. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a new dorsal conservative technique was born and for several years was an alternative option to treat the same problem without damaging the keystone area while preserving the dorsal connection between the upper lateral cartilage and the septum. The aim of this article is to review the history and evolution of this technique, which has been reborn after several years, and how it has evolved since then.


Author(s):  
Juliano de Oliveira Sales ◽  
Wolfgang Gubisch ◽  
Rodrigo Ribeiro Ferreira Duarte ◽  
Aline Souza Costa Teixeira Moreno ◽  
Felipe Marques de Oliveira ◽  
...  

AbstractHere we describe a new technique to deal with alar retraction, a highly undesirable imperfection of the nose. The procedure involves placing a caudal extension graft below the vestibular portion of the lower lateral cartilage (LLC) after its detachment from the vestibular skin. The graft is fixed to the cartilage and, subsequently, to the vestibular tissue. The present retrospective study included 20 patients, 11 females and 9 males, with a mean age of 28.90 years. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 18 months. Surgery improved alar notching to a smoother dome shape and nostril exposure was reduced in every patient. The caudal extension graft of the LLC contributed to rise in overall patient satisfaction, as revealed by the postoperative increase of the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) mean score from 40.0 to 79.17 (p < 0.0001). It also contributed to and improved functional outcomes, as indicated by the decrease of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) mean score from 52.75 to 13.25 (p = 0.0001). Sex did not affect the mean ROE and NOSE scores. Thus, increased patient satisfaction measured by the ROE is present in both sexes and at both age groups but it is better detected in the first year after surgery. Functional improvements analyzed with NOSE are best detected in patients aged ≥ 30 years and in follow-ups of 11 months. The caudal extension graft of the LLC technique described herein effectively and safely corrects alar retraction and the collapse of the nasal valve while filling the soft triangle.


2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (8) ◽  
pp. 1767-1771 ◽  
Author(s):  
David F. Smith ◽  
Monirah Albathi ◽  
Andrew Lee ◽  
Linda N. Lee ◽  
Kofi D. Boahene

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Weitzman ◽  
Shekhar K. Gadkaree ◽  
Natalie S. Justicz ◽  
Robin W. Lindsay

ORL ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 299-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Bast ◽  
Anna Heimer ◽  
Thomas Schrom

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document