Breast reconstruction by exclusive fat grafting: What about the breast projection?

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 1146-1147
Author(s):  
J. Niddam ◽  
A. Durazzo ◽  
J.P. Meningaud
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Breast Projection

The “Hug Flap”: Surgical Technique to Enhance the Aesthetic Breast Projection in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moustapha Hamdi ◽  
Sara Al Harami ◽  
Fadel Chahine ◽  
Gabriel Giunta ◽  
Randy De Baerdemaeker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Delayed Breast Reconstruction ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Breast Projection ◽  
Abdominal Flaps

Abstract Background Obtaining a natural breast mound shape contributes profoundly to a symmetrical and successful outcome in breast reconstruction. Objectives The authors sought to describe a new and efficient technique that enhances breast projection in delayed breast reconstruction employing abdominal free flaps and compare it with the current standard methods utilized. Methods The charts of 490 consecutive patients who underwent delayed breast reconstruction employing free abdominal perforator flaps were reviewed between 2007 and 2017. Three methods of breast reconstruction were compared: undermining, de-epithelialization, and the “hug flap” (HF). In the newly described technique, the caudal mastectomy skin was de-epithelialized, and then the medial and lateral thirds were undermined and folded over to cover the central part. The rates of complications and secondary corrections were analyzed between the 3 groups. Results There were 570 free abdominal flaps performed. The de-epithelization technique was the most commonly utilized (328 cases) followed by the undermining technique (153 cases). The HF technique was employed in 89 cases. The majority of HFs were performed in unilateral breast reconstruction. Bilateral cases were conducted in only 12 patients. The need for additional fat grafting was significantly (P = 0.003) less required in the HF group compared with the undermining and de-epithelializing groups (12% vs 28% and 21%, respectively). Conclusions Although all breast-enhancing options can be mixed and matched based on the surgeon’s preference and experience as well as each patient’s needs, the HF can be considered as an adjunct tool to provide adequate flap projection and enhance breast symmetry. Level of Evidence: 4

scholarly journals The Future of Fat Grafting

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S69-S74
Author(s):  
Summer E Hanson
Keyword(s):  
Adipose Tissue ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
The Other ◽  
Special Topic ◽  
Autologous Fat Grafting ◽  
Upper Arm ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Autologous Fat ◽  
The Face

Abstract One of the earliest reported cases of autologous fat grafting (AFG) was by Neuber in 1893 and consisted of the transfer of small lobules of fat from the upper arm for cicatrical depression of the face. He advocated the use of smaller grafts, noting that pieces larger than the size of a bean would form cysts. In 1895, Czerny excised a lumbar lipoma and transplanted it to the chest for breast reconstruction. Since these early reports, the knowledge base around AFG has expanded exponentially, as illustrated by the other papers within this special topic. As we embark on the next phase of AFG in the clinical setting, there are several directions which are near-clinical translation. This paper discusses future directions in fat grafting that build on optimization of our current techniques as clinical indications expand, such as supplementing purified lipoaspirate and the associated regulatory burden, or deconstructing adipose tissue to selectively use adipose graft components for a variety of regenerative indications.

Citation Analysis in Breast Reconstruction Publications Between 2000 and 2010

2021 ◽  
pp. 229255032110499
Author(s):  
Rebecca Miller ◽  
Sheina Macadam ◽  
Daniel Demsey
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Fat Graft ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Acellular Dermal

Introduction and Purpose: Breast reconstruction is an active area of plastic surgery research. Citation analysis allows for quantitative analysis of publications, with more citations presumed to indicate greater influence. We performed citation analysis to evaluate the most cited papers on breast reconstruction between 2000 to 2010 to identify contemporary research trends. Methods: The SCI-EXPANDED database was used to identify the 50 most cited papers. Data points included authorship, publication year, publication journal, study design, level of evidence, number of surgeons/institutions, center of surgery, primary outcome assessed, implant/flap/acellular dermal matrix/fat graft, acellular dermal matrix brand and use with implants/flaps, fat graft use with implants/flaps, unilateral/bilateral, one-/two-stage, immediate/delayed, number of patients/procedures, complications. Descriptive analysis of trends was performed based on results. Results: 20% of papers were published in 2006, 16% in 2007 and 12% in both 2004/2009. 66% were published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. The majority were retrospective or case series, and of Level III or IV evidence. The one Level I study was a prospective multicenter trial. 21 and 7 papers discussed procedures by single/multiple surgeons, respectively. Results from single/multiple centers were discussed in 18 and 6 papers, respectively. 30 papers discussed implant-based reconstruction, 22 papers flap-based (19 microsurgical), 15 papers acellular dermal matrix, and five papers fat grafting. The primary focus in the majority was complications or outcomes. Conclusion: Our analysis demonstrates continually evolving techniques in breast reconstruction. However, there is notable lack of high quality evidence to guide surgical decision-making in the face of increasing surgical options.

Autologous Fat Grafting in Secondary Breast Reconstruction

2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Caviggioli ◽  
Valeriano Vinci ◽  
Luca Maione ◽  
Andrea Lisa ◽  
Marco Klinger
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Autologous Fat Grafting ◽  
Autologous Fat

Prosthetic-Based Breast Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Nguyen ◽  
Justin Williams ◽  
Albert Losken
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Breast Implant ◽  
Tissue Expander ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Immediate Reconstruction ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Prosthetic Reconstruction ◽  
Acellular Dermal

Prosthetic reconstruction is the most popular option for breast reconstruction after mastectomy. There are several different techniques, such as prepectoral versus subpectoral placement, and delayed versus immediate reconstruction, each with their own sets of risks and benefits. With the advent of improved implant technology, acellular dermal matrix, and fat grafting, prepectoral direct to implant has become an accepted and increasingly popular method of reconstruction, with similar to improved complication rates and outcomes as traditional staged tissue expander reconstruction. Prosthetic reconstruction has had some recent controversies, including breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma and breast implant illness, and many future studies are being directed towards these topics. This review contains 5 figures, and 53 references. Keywords: breast reconstruction, breast implant, acellular dermal matrix, prepectoral reconstruction, tissue expander, fat grafting, capsular contracture, immediate reconstruction, breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, breast implant illness

Ancillary considerations in breast surgery

2021 ◽  
pp. 1145-1150
Author(s):  
Emily G. Clark ◽  
Melissa A. Mueller ◽  
Gregory R.D. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
Capsular Contracture ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Oncological Safety ◽  
Acellular Dermal ◽  
Radiographic Changes ◽  
Suspicious Lesions

Debated topics and new and evolving techniques in breast surgery are discussed in this chapter. Antibiotics and the use of closed-suction drains vary among surgeons, but the existing evidence favours discontinuation of antibiotics within 24 hours in most cases, and the indications for drains are limited but include breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix (ADM). ADM is a biological tissue substitute with many applications in breast surgery. The product selected and surgical technique used are often case specific; cost and patient anatomy play major roles. Although not suitable for all patients, ADM is an asset to prosthetic breast reconstruction. In addition, ADM is useful in the correction of breast surgery complications, including malpositioning and capsular contracture. It may be combined with fat grafting to mask rippling. Fat grafting, or lipomodelling, is an evolving science with promising results. Technique is critical for good results, and is described in this chapter. Radiographic changes after fat grafting are usually discernible from suspicious lesions, and growing evidence supports the oncological safety of this procedure

scholarly journals Bilateral Breast Reconstruction With Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps and Immediate Implant Augmentation

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie K Chu ◽  
Michael DeFazio ◽  
Rene D Largo ◽  
Merrick Ross
Keyword(s):  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Fat Grafting ◽  
Silicone Implants ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Immediate Reconstruction ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Artery Perforator

Abstract The smaller volume of the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap relative to that of abdominal flaps limits the size of breast reconstruction that may be achieved. Immediate implant augmentation of abdominal free flaps has been performed, but immediate implant augmentation of PAP flaps has never been described. A 54-year-old woman with BRCA2 mutation, submuscular implants, and previous abdominoplasty presented for nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSM). Autologous tissue volume was inadequate to support reconstruction to the desired size. She wished to avoid serial expansion. Skin quality was unsuitable for direct-to-implant reconstruction. The patient underwent bilateral NSM. The previous implants were removed with capsule preservation. Bilateral PAP flaps were harvested and anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels. Moderate classic profile 170-mL smooth round silicone implants were placed into the existing capsule pockets with lateral capsulorraphy. There were no flap, implant, or infectious complications. Initial mastectomy skin and nipple ischemia completely resolved without necrosis. Donor site healing was uneventful. At 8 months, the reconstruction is supple and the implants remain well-positioned without rippling. One minor revision was performed for fat grafting and to correct lateral nipple deviation. PAP flap breast reconstruction with immediate implant augmentation is technically feasible. Advantages include improved prosthetic coverage, allowing for immediate reconstruction to a larger size with reduced concern regarding mastectomy skin necrosis and threat to the device, optimal implant camouflage, and improved substrate for secondary fat grafting if necessary. Level of Evidence: 5

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document