Outcomes in Volume Replacement and Volume Displacement Techniques in Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Fasna Raufdeen ◽  
Jessica Murphy ◽  
Monish Ahluwalia ◽  
Christopher J Coroneos ◽  
Achilles Thoma
BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e020859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Hu ◽  
Richard M Rainsbury ◽  
Ashvina Segaran ◽  
Oana Predescu ◽  
Pankaj G Roy

IntroductionOncoplastic breast surgery allows the excision of larger tumours without compromising cosmetic outcome and can be broadly divided into volume displacement and volume replacement techniques. Although oncoplastic surgery has rapidly gained acceptance and is now widely practised, evidence is still lacking especially in patients who underwent volume replacement techniques. As it is a relatively new technique that has been described in the literature in the recent years, a summary of evidence from this literature can help clinicians to understand the clinical, oncologicalandcosmetic outcomes of such procedures.Methods and analysisAll original studies including randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case–control studies and case series involving more than 10 women undergoing partial breast reconstruction using a volume replacement technique will be included. The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes following volume replacement in patients undergoing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. The secondary objective is to review the patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) associated with oncoplastic breast surgery to help identify any unmet needs and to consider refining the existing PROMs to suit women undergoing volume replacement surgery.A comprehensive literature search, eligibility assessment and extraction of data will be conducted by two trained teams acting independently. Data will be extracted and stored in a database with standardised extraction fields to facilitate easy and consistent data entry. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the Cochrane tests.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review requires no ethical approval. It will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it will also be presented at nationalandinternational conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017075700; Pre-results.


1997 ◽  
Vol 84 (7) ◽  
pp. 1028-1029
Author(s):  
M. Noguchi ◽  
U. Khan ◽  
A. E. Young ◽  
C. Healy ◽  
R. M. Rainsbury

The Breast ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 105-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su C. Ang ◽  
Grace Tapia ◽  
Emily J. Davidson ◽  
Bora Kahramangil ◽  
Cindy Mak ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Gray ◽  
Barbara A. Pockaj ◽  
Erin Garvey ◽  
Sarah Blair

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. S35-S40
Author(s):  
Giulio Cuffolo ◽  
Nadia Gilani ◽  
Lisa Whisker ◽  
Krystjian Asgeirsson

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 7-14
Author(s):  
Ali Yasen Y Mohamedahmed ◽  
Shafquat Zaman ◽  
Ananth Srinivasan ◽  
Elizabeth Peterknecht ◽  
Salma Saeed S Mohammed ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document