The Impact of Brachytherapy Boost on Overall Survival in Men with High Risk Prostate Cancer and a Very High PSA: Is There a PSA Ceiling?

5082 Background: The impact of initial local therapy selection on survival for high risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients remains uncertain. We sought to assess this effect, while limiting competing causes of death, through the examination of a younger PCa patient cohort within the National Cancer Database. Methods: We evaluated the overall survival (OS) of men under 60 with high risk PCa receiving either radiation therapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). All men in this age group were treated between 2004 and 2013, harbored cN0M0 disease, and presented with Gleason Scores (GS) of 8 to 10. The RT group included patients who received external beam radiation (EBRT) alone or EBRT in combination with brachytherapy (BT). Overall survival and covariates were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results: A total of 16,944 patients met inclusion criteria of which 12,155 underwent RP and 4,789 received RT as initial therapy. 82.5% of RT patients received hormonal therapy, and the median dose was 77.4 Gy. In the RP group, 17.2% of patients received postoperative radiation, and 87% of these cases received a dose exceeding 64.80 Gy. The RP group had a higher proportion of cases with Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score > 0 (15.2% v. 11.2%, p < 0.000001). At a median follow-up of 50 months (0 - 131 months), RP was associated with improved OS in comparison to RT (hazard ratio = 0.52; 95% CI (0.47, 0.58); p < 0.000001). The estimated 8-year OS (±1 standard error of the estimate) was 85.1±0.7% and 74.9±0.7%, after RP and RT, respectively. This benefit remained present when adjusting for age, year of treatment, race, comorbidity score, Gleason score, T stage, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, form of radiation, PSA, or insurance status. Conclusions: Compared to RT, initial treatment of men under 60 with high risk PCa with RP results in a large, statistically significant improvement in overall survival that remains consistent over time and remains significant in a multivariable model adjusting for known prognostic variables. These results are limited by the retrospective nature of the database analysis, and the lack of cancer specific survival information.

Download Full-text

Androgen deprivation therapy does not impact cause-specific or overall survival in high-risk prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy and supplemental external beam

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.15578 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 15578-15578

Author(s):

Z. Allen ◽

G. S. Merrick ◽

W. Butler ◽

K. Wallner ◽

R. Galbreath ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

High Risk ◽

Pulmonary Disease ◽

Androgen Deprivation Therapy ◽

Gleason Score ◽

Androgen Deprivation ◽

High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽

Risk Prostate Cancer ◽

The Impact

15578 Background: To determine cause-specific (CSS), biochemical progression-free (bPFS) and overall survival (OS) in high risk prostate cancer patients undergoing brachytherapy with or without supplemental therapies. Methods: From April 1995 through July 2002, 204 patients with high risk prostate cancer (Gleason score = 8 and/or PSA > 20 ng/mL and/or clinical stage = T2c) underwent brachytherapy with or without supplemental therapies. Of the 204 patients, 193 (94.6%) received supplemental XRT and 119 (58.3%) received ADT (ADT = 6 months n=40 and ADT > 6 months n = 79). Median follow-up was 7.0 years. All patients were implanted at least 4 years prior to analysis. BPFS was defined by a PSA = 0.40 ng/mL after nadir. Multiple clinical, treatment and dosimetric parameters were evaluated for the impact on survival. Results: The ten-year CSS, bPFS and OS were 88.9%, 86.6% and 68.6%, respectively. A statistically significant difference in bPFS was discerned between hormone naïve, ADT = 6 months and ADT > 6 month cohorts (79.7% vs. 95.0% vs. 89.9%, p= 0.032). ADT did not impact CSS (94.0% vs. 87.1%, p=0.983 ) or OS (65.2% vs. 70.3%, p = 0.713). For bPFS patients, the median post-treatment PSA was < 0.04 ng/mL. A Cox linear regression analysis demonstrated that Gleason score was the best predictor of CSS while percent positive biopsies and duration of ADT best predicted for bPFS. OS was best predicted by Gleason score and diabetes. Thirty-eight patients have died with 26 of the deaths due to cardiovascular/pulmonary disease or second malignancy. Eleven patients have died of metastatic prostate cancer. Conclusions: Androgen deprivation therapy improved 10-year bPFS without statistical impact on CSS or OS. Death as a result of cardiovascular/pulmonary disease and second malignancies were more than twice as common as prostate cancer deaths. Strategies to improve cardiovascular health should positively impact overall survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text