Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q): Norms for young adult women

2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Mond ◽  
P.J. Hay ◽  
B. Rodgers ◽  
C. Owen
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet A. Lydecker ◽  
Rebecca R. Hubbard ◽  
Carrie B. Tully ◽  
Shawn O. Utsey ◽  
Suzanne E. Mazzeo

Author(s):  
Emily Holcombe ◽  
Jennifer Manlove ◽  
Erum Ikramullah

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fidia Novenz Wahidah ◽  
Trida Cynthia ◽  
Anita Zulkaida

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-03
Author(s):  
Hemlata Munjappa ◽  
◽  
Smita Shinde ◽  
Meena Parekh ◽  
Atish Pagar ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 103985622110286
Author(s):  
Tracey Wade ◽  
Jamie-Lee Pennesi ◽  
Yuan Zhou

Objective: Currently eligibility for expanded Medicare items for eating disorders (excluding anorexia nervosa) require a score ⩾ 3 on the 22-item Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). We compared these EDE-Q “cases” with continuous scores on a validated 7-item version of the EDE-Q (EDE-Q7) to identify an EDE-Q7 cut-off commensurate to 3 on the EDE-Q. Methods: We utilised EDE-Q scores of female university students ( N = 337) at risk of developing an eating disorder. We used a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the relationship between the true-positive rate (sensitivity) and the false-positive rate (1-specificity) of cases ⩾ 3. Results: The area under the curve showed outstanding discrimination of 0.94 (95% CI: .92–.97). We examined two specific cut-off points on the EDE-Q7, which included 100% and 87% of true cases, respectively. Conclusion: Given the EDE-Q cut-off for Medicare is used in conjunction with other criteria, we suggest using the more permissive EDE-Q7 cut-off (⩾2.5) to replace use of the EDE-Q cut-off (⩾3) in eligibility assessments.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn J. Heckman ◽  
Teja Munshi ◽  
Susan Darlow ◽  
Jacqueline D. Kloss ◽  
Sharon L. Manne ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document