Influence of the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) Program on the Quality of Care for Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. S130-S130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregg C. Fonarow ◽  
Kenneth A. LaBresh ◽  
Clyde Yancy ◽  
Nancy M. Albert ◽  
Gray Elrodt ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Feng Qian ◽  
Gregg C Fonarow ◽  
Selim R Krim ◽  
Rey P Vivo ◽  
Margueritte Cox ◽  
...  

Background: Because little is known about Asian American patients with heart failure (HF), we compared clinical profiles, quality of care, and outcomes between Asian American and non-Hispanic white HF patients using data from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) program. Methods: We analyzed 153,023 HF patients (149,249 whites, 97.5%; 3,774 Asian Americans, 2.5%) from 356 U.S. centers participating in the GWTG-HF program between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2012. Baseline characteristics, achievement measures, composite “all-or-none” care (proportion receiving all eligible achievement measures), quality measures, in-hospital mortality, discharge to home, and length of stay were examined. Results: Relative to white patients, Asian American HF patients were younger, more likely to be male, uninsured or covered by Medicaid, and recruited in the western region. They had higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and renal insufficiency. At admission, they had higher heart rate, systolic blood pressure, B-type natriuretic peptide, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen. Overall, Asian American HF patients had comparable quality of care except that they were less likely to receive aldosterone antagonists at discharge (relative risk , 0.88; 95% confidence interval , 0.78-0.99), and anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.97) even after risk adjustment. Asian American patients had lower unadjusted rate than white patients in terms of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) counseling (32.7% versus 48.1%) and ICD placed/prescribed at discharge (33.8% versus 50.6%). However, these differences were not statistically significant after risk adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics. Compared with white patients, Asian American patients had comparable in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and were more likely to be discharged to home (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.11) (Table). Conclusion: Despite some differences in clinical profiles, Asian American HF patients receive very similar quality of care and have comparable or even better health outcomes than white patients. This study suggests that focusing on 2 specific quality measures might further improve HF care for Asian Americans.


Author(s):  
Luke C. Cunningham ◽  
Gregg C. Fonarow ◽  
Clyde W. Yancy ◽  
Shubin Sheng ◽  
Roland A. Matsouaka ◽  
...  

Background Regional patient characteristics, care quality, and outcomes may differ based on a variety of factors among patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF). Regional disparities in outcomes of cardiovascular disease have been suggested across various regions in the United States. This study examined whether there are significant differences by region in quality of care and short‐term outcomes of hospitalized patients with HF across the United States. Methods and Results We examined regional demographics, quality measures, and short‐term outcomes across 4 US Census Bureau regions in patients hospitalized with HF and enrolled in the GWTG‐HF (Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure) registry from 2010 to 2016. Differences in length of stay and mortality by region were examined with multivariable logistic regression. The study included 423 333 patients hospitalized for HF in 488 hospitals. Patients in the Northeast were significantly older. Completion of achievement measures, with few exceptions, were met with similar frequency across regions. Multivariable analysis demonstrated significantly lower in‐hospital mortality in the Midwest compared with the Northeast (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51–0.8; P <0.00001). The length of stay varied significantly by region with a significantly higher risk‐adjusted length of stay in the Northeast compared with other regions. Conclusions Although we did not find any substantial differences by region in quality of care in patients hospitalized for HF, risk‐adjusted inpatient mortality was found to be lower in the Midwest compared with the Northeast, and may be secondary to unmeasured differences in patient characteristics, and to longer length of stay in the Northeast.


2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. S157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clyde W. Yancy ◽  
Gregg C. Fonarow ◽  
Kenneth A. LaBresh ◽  
Nancy M. Albert ◽  
Gray Ellrodt ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 156 (4) ◽  
pp. 674-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uptal D. Patel ◽  
Adrian F. Hernandez ◽  
Li Liang ◽  
Eric D. Peterson ◽  
Kenneth A. LaBresh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document