Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Al-Abdouh ◽  
Sireesha Upadhrasta ◽  
Oluwaseun Fashanu ◽  
Hadi Elias ◽  
Di Zhao ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M Ndunda ◽  
Mohinder Vindhyal ◽  
Tabitha M Muutu ◽  
Sinan Khayyat ◽  
Sachin Srinivasan ◽  
...  

Introduction: Stroke is still a major complication that is reported in 2-5% of patients at 30 days, after a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The Sentinel Cerebral Protection System (CPS) (Claret Medical Inc., Santa Rosa, CA. USA) is the only FDA approved cerebral embolic protection device (CEPD). This meta-analysis aims to assess the potential benefits of the routine use of CPS after TAVR. Methods: The Cochrane library, PubMed and Web of science were searched for relevant studies. Two authors independently screened and included studies that were randomized controlled trials or controlled observational studies comparing the use of Sentinel CPS with no CEPD in TAVR. Data was extracted and the risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tools (RoB2.0 and ROBINS-I). Results: Four studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 1 quasi experimental study) comparing 847 patients in whom sentinel CPS was used to 483 in whom it was not used. Two of the studies had low risk of bias and 2 had some concerns for risk of bias. The primary outcomes were the number or size of ischemic lesions on brain MRI in 2 studies, major cardiac and cerebrovascular events in 1 study and a composite of mortality or stroke in 1 study. Patients in whom Sentinel CPS was used had lower rates of 30-day clinical stroke (3.5% vs 6.1%; RR 0.51 [95% CI 0.29, 0.90] I 2 = 0%), 30-day mortality (0.8% vs 2.7%; RR 0.34 [95% CI 0.12, 0.92] I 2 = 0%) and major or life-threatening bleeding (3.3% vs 6.6%; RR 0.50 [95% CI 0.26, 0.98] I 2 = 16%). There was no significant difference between the two arms in the incidence of acute kidney injury (0.8% vs 1%; RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.22, 3.24] I 2 = 0%) and major vascular complications (5.1% vs 6%; RR 0.74 [95% CI 0.33, 1.67] I 2 = 45%). Conclusion: Sentinel CPS use in TAVR can be helpful in reducing the risk of stroke, mortality and major or life-threatening bleeding at 30 days.


Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (10) ◽  
pp. 1043-1061
Author(s):  
Flavien Vincent ◽  
Julien Ternacle ◽  
Tom Denimal ◽  
Mylène Shen ◽  
Bjorn Redfors ◽  
...  

After 15 years of successive randomized, controlled trials, indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are rapidly expanding. In the coming years, this procedure could become the first line treatment for patients with a symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and a tricuspid aortic valve anatomy. However, randomized, controlled trials have excluded bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), which is the most frequent congenital heart disease occurring in 1% to 2% of the total population and representing at least 25% of patients 80 years of age or older referred for aortic valve replacement. The use of a less invasive transcatheter therapy in this elderly population became rapidly attractive, and approximately 10% of patients currently undergoing TAVR have a BAV. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the “European Conformity” have approved TAVR for low-risk patients regardless of the aortic valve anatomy whereas international guidelines recommend surgical replacement in BAV populations. Given this progressive expansion of TAVR toward younger and lower-risk patients, heart teams are encountering BAV patients more frequently, while the ability of this therapy to treat such a challenging anatomy remains uncertain. This review will address the singularity of BAV anatomy and associated technical challenges for the TAVR procedure. We will examine and summarize available clinical evidence and highlight critical knowledge gaps regarding TAVR utilization in BAV patients. We will provide a comprehensive overview of the role of computed tomography scans in the diagnosis, and classification of BAV and TAVR procedure planning. Overall, we will offer an integrated framework for understanding the current role of TAVR in the treatment of bicuspid aortic stenosis and for guiding physicians in clinical decision-making.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document