Abstract 17063: The Potential Role of Sentinel Cerebral Protection System in Improving Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M Ndunda ◽  
Mohinder Vindhyal ◽  
Tabitha M Muutu ◽  
Sinan Khayyat ◽  
Sachin Srinivasan ◽  
...  

Introduction: Stroke is still a major complication that is reported in 2-5% of patients at 30 days, after a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The Sentinel Cerebral Protection System (CPS) (Claret Medical Inc., Santa Rosa, CA. USA) is the only FDA approved cerebral embolic protection device (CEPD). This meta-analysis aims to assess the potential benefits of the routine use of CPS after TAVR. Methods: The Cochrane library, PubMed and Web of science were searched for relevant studies. Two authors independently screened and included studies that were randomized controlled trials or controlled observational studies comparing the use of Sentinel CPS with no CEPD in TAVR. Data was extracted and the risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tools (RoB2.0 and ROBINS-I). Results: Four studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 1 quasi experimental study) comparing 847 patients in whom sentinel CPS was used to 483 in whom it was not used. Two of the studies had low risk of bias and 2 had some concerns for risk of bias. The primary outcomes were the number or size of ischemic lesions on brain MRI in 2 studies, major cardiac and cerebrovascular events in 1 study and a composite of mortality or stroke in 1 study. Patients in whom Sentinel CPS was used had lower rates of 30-day clinical stroke (3.5% vs 6.1%; RR 0.51 [95% CI 0.29, 0.90] I 2 = 0%), 30-day mortality (0.8% vs 2.7%; RR 0.34 [95% CI 0.12, 0.92] I 2 = 0%) and major or life-threatening bleeding (3.3% vs 6.6%; RR 0.50 [95% CI 0.26, 0.98] I 2 = 16%). There was no significant difference between the two arms in the incidence of acute kidney injury (0.8% vs 1%; RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.22, 3.24] I 2 = 0%) and major vascular complications (5.1% vs 6%; RR 0.74 [95% CI 0.33, 1.67] I 2 = 45%). Conclusion: Sentinel CPS use in TAVR can be helpful in reducing the risk of stroke, mortality and major or life-threatening bleeding at 30 days.

Author(s):  
Toshiki Kuno ◽  
Yujiro Yokoyama ◽  
Alexandros Briasoulis ◽  
Makoto Mori ◽  
Masao Iwagami ◽  
...  

Background Although current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 3 to 6 months following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), there are no studies directly comparing outcomes of different durations of DAPT following TAVR. Methods and Results PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database were searched through November 2020 to identify clinical studies that investigated single antiplatelet therapy versus DAPT use following TAVR. Studies using oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy concomitantly were excluded. The DAPT group was subdivided by the duration of DAPT. We extracted the risk ratios (RRs) of major or life‐threatening bleeding, stroke, and all‐cause mortality. Four randomized controlled trials, 2 propensity‐score matched studies, and 1 observational study were identified, yielding a total of 2498 patients who underwent TAVR assigned to the single antiplatelet therapy group (n=1249), 3‐month DAPT group (n=485), or 6‐month DAPT group (n=764). Pooled analyses demonstrated that when compared with the single antiplatelet therapy group, the rates of major or life‐threatening bleeding were significantly higher in the 3‐ and 6‐month DAPT groups (RR [95% CI]=2.13 [1.33–3.40], P =0.016; RR [95% CI]=2.54 [1.49–4.33], P =0.007, respectively) with no difference between the 3‐month DAPT versus 6‐month DAPT groups. The rates of stroke and all‐cause mortality were similar among the 3 groups. Conclusions In this network meta‐analysis of antiplatelet therapy following TAVR, single antiplatelet therapy with aspirin had lower bleeding without increasing stroke or death when compared with either 3‐ or 6‐month DAPT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document