Influence of computer feedback on attentional biases to emotional faces in children

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 881-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana García-Blanco ◽  
María del Carmen García-Blanco ◽  
Belén Fernando ◽  
Manuel Perea
2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 807-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. V. Pavlov ◽  
V. V. Korenyok ◽  
N. V. Reva ◽  
A. V. Tumyalis ◽  
K. V. Loktev ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 409-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mara Mather ◽  
Laura L. Carstensen

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jallu Lindblom ◽  
Mikko J Peltola ◽  
Mervi Vänskä ◽  
Jari K Hietanen ◽  
Anu Laakso ◽  
...  

The family environment shapes children’s social information processing and emotion regulation. Yet, the long-term effects of early family systems have rarely been studied. This study investigated how family system types predict children’s attentional biases toward facial expressions at the age of 10 years. The participants were 79 children from Cohesive, Disengaged, Enmeshed, and Authoritarian family types based on marital and parental relationship trajectories from pregnancy to the age of 12 months. A dot-probe task was used to assess children’s emotional attention biases toward threatening (angry) and affiliative (happy) faces at the early (500 ms) and late (1250 ms) stages of processing. Situational priming was applied to activate children’s sense of danger or safety. Results showed that children from Cohesive families had an early-stage attentional bias toward threat, whereas children from Enmeshed families had a late-stage bias toward threat. Children from Disengaged families had an early-stage attentional bias toward threat, but showed in addition a late-stage bias away from emotional faces (i.e., both angry and happy). Children from Authoritarian families, in turn, showed a late-stage attentional bias toward emotional faces. Situational priming did not moderate the effects of family system types on children’s attentional biases. The findings confirm the influence of early family systems on the attentional biases, suggesting differences in the emotion regulation strategies children have developed to adapt to their family environments.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0128271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maeve O’Leary-Barrett ◽  
Robert O. Pihl ◽  
Eric Artiges ◽  
Tobias Banaschewski ◽  
Arun L. W. Bokde ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 466-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanna M. L. Short ◽  
Wendy J. Adams ◽  
Matthew Garner ◽  
Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke ◽  
Graeme Fairchild

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Autumn J. Kujawa ◽  
Dana Torpey ◽  
Jiyon Kim ◽  
Greg Hajcak ◽  
Suzanne Rose ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia R. Hunt ◽  
Arash Sahraie ◽  
Neil Macrae

It has long been proposed that some stimulus classes are so biologically important that they are automatically prioritized by the attention system, irrespective of context. However, issues of ecological validity undermine laboratory-based experiments that attempt to establish the existence of context-independent attentional biases. Here we measured attention to faces and facial expressions of emotion while participants were sitting in a waiting room before the experiment, and again in the same individuals in a laboratory-based reaction-time (RT) task. A robust bias towards images of faces was observed in the waiting room, but not in the RT task. Conversely, a robust attentional bias towards emotional faces was observed in the RT task, but not in the waiting room. Despite large individual differences in attentional biases towards face and facial emotions, measures of bias in a given individual in one setting did not predict their bias in another. We conclude that attentional capture by faces and facial emotions is highly sensitive to context.


1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan P. Bradley ◽  
Karin Mogg ◽  
Neil Millar ◽  
Claire Bonham-Carter ◽  
Emma Fergusson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document