scholarly journals Benefits of an out-of-school time program on social-emotional learning among disadvantaged adolescent youth: A retrospective analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 106262
Author(s):  
Rochelle Helms ◽  
R. Fukkink ◽  
K. van Driel ◽  
H.C.M. Vorst
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-225
Author(s):  
T. Nigel Gannon

Social and Emotional Learning in Out-of-School Time: Foundations and Futures (Delaney & Moroney, 2018) offers a rich volume of experiences and voices of leadership in social and emotional learning (SEL) in out-of-school time (OST) settings. From various vantage points and with unique voices, the chapters address all stages of intentional SEL programming, including progress made in the field in clarifying and measuring the strength of SEL outcomes and identifying needed professional development. This is an important resource for students and practitioners of positive youth development, SEL, and OST learning environments. 


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 31-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie B. Shapiro ◽  
Sarah Accomazzo ◽  
Jennette Claassen ◽  
Jennifer L. Fleming Robitaille

Out-of-School-Time (OST) programs are increasingly recognized as a venue to actively engage children and youth in character development activities, but little guidance exists as to how to assess individual children and youth in OST environments for the sake of evaluating their character development. This research brief uses an illustrative case study to reflect upon the experience of selecting and completing a strength-based, multi-modal social-emotional / character assessment that used a direct assessment and a multiple informant behavior rating scale in an OST setting. Insights derived from the case study reveal opportunities and challenges associated with each assessment modality. This paper shares lessons learned with those conducting individual assessments in OST environments and with those seeking to improve our capacity to complete screening, formative, and summative assessments of social-emotional and character constructs in OST youth development programs to help children. 


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Schwartz ◽  
Laura Hamilton ◽  
Susannah Faxon-Mills ◽  
Celia Gomez ◽  
Alice Huguet ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Bailey ◽  
Laura Stickle ◽  
Gretchen Brion-Meisels ◽  
Stephanie M. Jones

Many schools and out-of-school organizations use social-emotional learning (SEL) programs to boost students’ skills. Yet research shows that these programs can be difficult to implement and don’t always meet students’ needs. In response, Rebecca Bailey, Laura Stickle, Gretchen Brion-Meisels, and Stephanie Jones propose a new approach to SEL premised on three big ideas: SEL should be framed around a developmental model designed to target specific, age-appropriate skills; a flexible strategy-based approach may increase the feasibility of SEL implementation and school-wide consistency; and SEL is most effective when teachers are encouraged to implement and adapt strategies that meet their students’ needs and reflect their experiences. The authors describe how such a program was implemented in a preK-8 summer program.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Zadrazil Newman

Extensive research demonstrates that a qualified workforce is essential to out-of-school time program quality, which, in turn, is essential for positive youth development. Recently, the in- and out-of-school fields have witnessed an increase in attention to social and emotional learning practices and programs, yet less is known about how to support the adults who are engaged in the social and emotional learning process. A first step in supporting this workforce is to build the collective knowledge around what social and emotional learning is and what the practices are that support social and emotional development. We also believe there is a need to identify and describe the connection between what has been and what could be—that is, connecting youth development as a foundation for intentional social and emotional learning. We reviewed a selection of widely disseminated, research-based, practitioner-focused resources to identify the specific practices that promote social and emotional learning. This process elevated a set of 8 practices, which we delineated into 2 categories: foundational organizational practices and programmatic practices that support social and emotional development. In addition, we completed a comprehensive crosswalk of those practices with seminal youth development and out-of-school time resources to demonstrate the alignment and progression from youth development to social and emotional learning. This article describes the 8 social and emotional learning practices and highlights connections to foundational youth development practices. We conclude with a set of recommendations for the field leaders who must continue to support the workforce.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Schwartz ◽  
Laura Hamilton ◽  
Susannah Faxon-Mills ◽  
Celia Gomez ◽  
Alice Huguet ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document