scholarly journals RISK FACTORS, BIOMARKERS AND FRAMINGHAM RISK ESTIMATE FAIL TO IDENTIFY PRESENCE OF SUBCLINICAL ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN YOUNG INDIVIDUAL WITH FAMILY HISTORY OF PREMATURE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PILOT DATA OF EARLY ATHEROSCLEROSIS CLINIC

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. S128
Author(s):  
S. Ghadiri ◽  
J. Leipsic ◽  
N. Elahi ◽  
J. Weir-McCall ◽  
J. Halankar ◽  
...  
10.2223/1153 ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ceres C. Romaldini ◽  
Hugo Issler ◽  
Ary L. Cardoso ◽  
Jayme Diament ◽  
Neusa Forti

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-149
Author(s):  
Hamat Hamdi Che Hassan ◽  

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) events can be accelerated by positive family history of young coronary artery disease (CAD). Risk factors assessment sometimes fail to predict ACS occurrence. Additional investigations with coronary artery calcium (CAC) score can be used independently in screening for primary prevention in some population. This was a cross-sectional study in asymptomatic population with first degree relatives (FDR) having premature CAD compared with a matched population with no family history of CAD from September 2017 to March 2018 at the Cardiology Clinic of Univeristi Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre. A total of 36 subjects were recruited with equal number in each group. Female were the majority in each group (66.7%). The FDR group were slightly younger compared to the control group [mean (SD) age 36.9 (4.9) against 38 (3.8), respectively). Both groups represent high risk factors including overweight and obesity, abdominal obesity as well as dyslipidemia. Newly diagnosed dyslipidemia was significant in the group with family history (83.3% versus 44.4%, P<0.01). Both groups were screened either into the low or moderate risk Framingham Risk Score group. CAC score was higher in family history group (11.1% vs 0%, P>0.05). In conclusion, CAC may be irrelevant for screening in younger population. However, the yield of other risk factor is still alarming.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ghadiri ◽  
J Leipsic ◽  
N Elahi ◽  
M Anastasius ◽  
A Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Patients with family history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD) are at increased risk of CAD events at a younger age. Risk factor based approaches and clinical evaluation are most commonly used to assess these individuals. However, it has been recently shown that up to 50% of individual presenting with their first myocardial infarction (MI) were considered to be “low risk” prior to that event. MI is often a result of plaque rupture preceded by progression of subclinical atherosclerosis. Detection of subclinical atherosclerosis may therefore help target prevention of plaque progression. We assessed the value of clinical risk factor, biomarkers and Framingham Risk Score (FRS) in predicting subclinical atherosclerosis in individuals with a family history of premature CAD. Methods From 310 referrals, 222 individuals between the ages of 35 and 55 with a family history of premature CAD (CAD events in first-degree family members (male <55, female <65)) were enrolled for evaluation of risk of CAD. Those with familial hypercholesteremia (possible, probable or definite) were excluded. Patients underwent clinical and risk factor evaluations as well as Cardiac CT or Calcium Score (CS) to assess presence of subclinical / clinical atherosclerosis at the discretion of the treating physician. Results In this pilot, 141 individuals (59% male, mean age 45.9±6.0 years) completed evaluation, and 65 (46%) had evidence of subclinical atherosclerosis on CT coronary angiography or CT calcium score with a mean segment involvement score (SIS) of 2.8 and mean CS of 152, putting them above the 80th percentile for their age and sex. Aside from male sex, age, and smoking history, other traditional risk factors and biomarkers including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C and Cholesterol/HDL-C were not significantly different between those with or without subclinical atherosclerosis (Table 1). Table 1 Conclusion In young individuals with a family history of premature CAD, risk factors, biomarkers, and FRS failed to identify individuals with premature, subclinical atherosclerosis in this pilot study. Detection of subclinical atherosclerosis and early implementation of treatment with the aim of stabilizing plaques and stopping progression might prove vital in reducing events in these individuals. Further studies are warranted.


2008 ◽  
Vol 155 (6) ◽  
pp. 1020-1026.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catalin Taraboanta ◽  
Evelyn Wu ◽  
Scott Lear ◽  
Stefanie DiPalma ◽  
John Hill ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Vikulova ◽  
L Bevanda ◽  
S N Pimstone ◽  
L R Brunham

Abstract Background Premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is highly heritable. The screening of first-degree relatives (FDR) of patients with premature ASCVD is recommended but not routinely performed, and the diagnostic yield of different approaches to such screening is unknown. Purpose To determine the feasibility and diagnostic yield of clinical and radiological screening of FDRs of patients with premature coronary artery disease (CAD) in clinical setting. Method We recruited FDRs of patients with angiographically-proven CAD with stenosis of ≥50% who presented at the age of ≤50 years for males and ≤55 years for females. After clinical and laboratory assessment, patients with no personal history of cardiovascular disease underwent either coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), coronary calcium scoring assessment (CAC), or carotid ultrasound (CUS). Subclinical atherosclerosis was defined as 1) CAC score &gt;100 Agatston units or &gt;75% percentile for age and sex; 2) Stenosis &gt;50% in at least one coronary artery or segment involvement scores &gt;50th percentile in males and &gt;75th in females; or, 3) Carotid plaque on ultrasonography. Results We enrolled 220 FDRs between 2017 and 2020, 129 completed clinical assessment (Figure 1). Of them, 28 (21.7%) had a personal history of ASCVD and 101 were tested for subclinical atherosclerosis. The characteristics of these patients are shown in Table 1. The most prevalent cardiovascular risk factors were dyslipidemia (40.6%), hypertension (22.8%), and obesity (21.8%). When assessed with the Framingham risk score calculator without adjustment for family history, only 5.1% and 28.6%, of patients had high or moderate cardiovascular risk, respectively. After adjusting for family history and the presence of statin-indicated conditions, 39.6% and 14.9% of patients were placed in high and moderate risk groups, respectively. Subclinical atherosclerosis was found in 43.6% of all patients (Figure 1) and 57.7% of patients over 40 years of age. The diagnostic yield of procedures was 29.6% for CUS, 37.8% for CCTA and 61.1% for CAC scoring. After the radiological assessment, 13.9% of patients were reclassified to a higher risk group (Table 1). Conclusion Non-invasive cardiovascular imaging detected subclinical atherosclerosis in 43.6% of healthy patients with a family history of premature ASCVD, moving 1 in 7 patients to a higher risk group and suggesting that this screening approach may improve risk prediction in this population. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Canadian Institutes of Health Research.St. Paul's Hospital Foundation and the Vancouver General Hospital Foundation. Figure 1 Table 1


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document