Binocular supra-threshold performance with contact lens-induced monovision: a reaction time and visual evoked potential study

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. e6-e7
Author(s):  
Eleni Papadatou ◽  
Sotiris Plainis ◽  
Maria Ganga
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-13
Author(s):  
Karishma Rajbhandari Pandey ◽  
Dipesh Raj Panday ◽  
Nirmala Limbu ◽  
Bhupendra Shah ◽  
Kopila Agarwal

Background: Nicotine in tobacco smoke causes demyelination. Again, hypoxia in long-term smokers is linked to neuropathy. Visual receptors are early sufferer of neuropathy. Visual-Acuity & other ocular tests often fail to detect subtle changes of neuropathy which, however, can be detected by VEP test. Literature review shows that changes in VEP come earlier than PFT changes in smokers. Ironically, smokers claim that smoking improves their reaction time, which can be assessed by VRT. Aims and Objective: To relate smoking status with VEP and VRT. Materials and Methods: Fifty-six subjects (smoker group = 28 & non-smoker group = 28), whose age & sex were matched, were included in the study. Their PFT, pattern VEP of both eyes & VRT were recorded. The data were compared between the two groups using unpaired t-test, considering statistical significance at p<0.05. Results: The FVC (4.35±0.83 vs. 5.32+1.18 l, p=0.022), FEF 25% (7.40+2.38 vs. 8.74+3.90 l/s, p=0.019) & FEF 50% (6.11+1.52 vs. 7.74+2.57, p= 0.010) were significantly lower in smokers compared to nonsmokers. There was no significant difference in P100 wave latency of VEP. But, VRT of smokers were significantly shorter (431.69+60.29 vs. 441.14+123.54 ms, p=0.010). Conclusion: Smokers have shorter visual reaction time and similar visual evoked potential as compared to non-smokers.


2011 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Shibata ◽  
Kiyomi Yamane ◽  
Yoshiko Nishimura ◽  
Hiromi Kondo ◽  
Kuniaki Otuka

Perception ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barrie J Frost ◽  
Jehuda J Kaminer

Two experiments were conducted on the orientation anisotropy in which averaged visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded from the occipital scalp. The first experiment confirmed the findings of Maffei and Campbell (1970) that obliquely oriented gratings alternated back and forth produced smaller-amplitude VEPs than when the gratings were oriented horizontally or vertically. Since no asymmetry was found in VEPs produced by a Julesz figure presented under identical conditions, it was concluded that direction of displacement could not have been contributing to the effect. In a second experiment head tilt of the subject was manipulated together with grating orientation and the results indicated that the orientation anisotropy is retinally rather than gravitationally referenced. It was concluded that the site of orientation constancy is located either at higher levels of the primary visual system or in the second visual system.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Sanchez-Lopez ◽  
Silvia Savazzi ◽  
Caterina Annalaura Pedersini ◽  
Nicolò Cardobi ◽  
Carlo Alberto Marzi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document