Brain function in the minimally conscious state: A quantitative neurophysiological study

2008 ◽  
Vol 119 (7) ◽  
pp. 1506-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Leon-Carrion ◽  
J.F. Martin-Rodriguez ◽  
J. Damas-Lopez ◽  
J.M. Barroso y Martin ◽  
M.R. Dominguez-Morales
Keyword(s):  
Brain Function ◽  
Minimally Conscious State ◽  
Conscious State ◽  
Neurophysiological Study ◽  
Minimally Conscious

scholarly journals Auditory localization should be considered as a sign of minimally conscious state based on multimodal findings

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manon Carrière ◽  
Helena Cassol ◽  
Charlène Aubinet ◽  
Rajanikant Panda ◽  
Aurore Thibaut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Function ◽  
Brain Metabolism ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Minimally Conscious State ◽  
Conscious State ◽  
Auditory Localization ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Level Of Consciousness ◽  
Minimally Conscious

Abstract Auditory localization (i.e. turning the head and/or the eyes towards an auditory stimulus) is often part of the clinical evaluation of patients recovering from coma. The objective of this study is to determine whether auditory localization could be considered as a new sign of minimally conscious state, using a multimodal approach. The presence of auditory localization and the clinical outcome at 2 years of follow-up were evaluated in 186 patients with severe brain injury, including 64 with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, 28 in minimally conscious state minus, 71 in minimally conscious state plus and 23 who emerged from the minimally conscious state. Brain metabolism, functional connectivity and graph theory measures were investigated by means of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, functional MRI and high-density electroencephalography in two subgroups of unresponsive patients, with and without auditory localization. These two subgroups were also compared to a subgroup of patients in minimally conscious state minus. Auditory localization was observed in 13% of unresponsive patients, 46% of patients in minimally conscious state minus, 62% of patients in minimally conscious state plus and 78% of patients who emerged from the minimally conscious state. The probability to observe an auditory localization increased along with the level of consciousness, and the presence of auditory localization could predict the level of consciousness. Patients with auditory localization had higher survival rates (at 2-year follow-up) than those without localization. Differences in brain function were found between unresponsive patients with and without auditory localization. Higher connectivity in unresponsive patients with auditory localization was measured between the fronto-parietal network and secondary visual areas, and in the alpha band electroencephalography network. Moreover, patients in minimally conscious state minus significantly differed from unresponsive patients without auditory localization in terms of brain metabolism and alpha network centrality, whereas no difference was found with unresponsive patients who presented auditory localization. Our multimodal findings suggest differences in brain function between unresponsive patients with and without auditory localization, which support our hypothesis that auditory localization should be considered as a new sign of minimally conscious state. Unresponsive patients showing auditory localization should therefore no longer be considered unresponsive but minimally conscious. This would have crucial consequences on these patients’ lives as it would directly impact the therapeutic orientation or end-of-life decisions usually taken based on the diagnosis.

scholarly journals The Role of Neuroimaging Techniques in Establishing Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy in Disorders of Consciousness

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia Gosseries ◽  
Francesca Pistoia ◽  
Vanessa Charland-Verville ◽  
Antonio Carolei ◽  
Simona Sacco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Function ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Minimally Conscious State ◽  
Conscious State ◽  
Disorders Of Consciousness ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Minimally Conscious ◽  
Neuroimaging Techniques

Non-communicative brain damaged patients raise important clinical and scientific issues. Here, we review three major pathological disorders of consciousness: coma, the unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and the minimally conscious state. A number of clinical studies highlight the difficulty in making a correct diagnosis in patients with disorders of consciousness based only on behavioral examinations. The increasing use of neuroimaging techniques allows improving clinical characterization of these patients. Recent neuroimaging studies using positron emission tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, electroencephalography and transcranial magnetic stimulation can help assess diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic treatment. These techniques, using resting state, passive and active paradigms, also highlight possible dissociations between consciousness and responsiveness, and are facilitating a more accurate understanding of brain function in this challenging population.

scholarly journals Altered Intestinal Microbiomes and Lipid Metabolism in Patients With Chronic Disorders of Consciousness

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benyan Luo ◽  
Jie Yu ◽  
Qisheng Cheng ◽  
Fangping He ◽  
Fanxia Meng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Function ◽  
Vegetative State ◽  
Minimally Conscious State ◽  
Conscious State ◽  
Disorders Of Consciousness ◽  
The Other ◽  
Intestinal Microbiome ◽  
Chronic Disorders ◽  
Minimally Conscious ◽  
Chronic Disorders Of Consciousness

Abstract Intestinal microbiotas regulate brain function of the host through the production of a myriad of metabolites and are associated with various neurological diseases. Understanding intestinal microbiome of patients in chronic disorders of consciousness (DoC) is important for the evaluation and treatment of the disease. To investigate the difference of intestinal microbiome and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) among the patients in vegetative state (VS), minimally conscious state (MCS) and emerged from minimally conscious state (EMCS), as well as the influence of antibiotics on these patients, 16S rRNA sequencing and targeted lipidomics were performed on their fecal samples and EEG signals analysis were used to evaluate their brain function. Our results showed that intestinal microbiome among the three groups differed greatly and some microbial community with its production of SCFAs were reduced in VS patients compared to the other two groups. Moreover, reduced microbial communities and five major SCFAs along with attenuated brain functional connectivity were observed in MCS patients treated with antibiotics compared to those received no antibiotic treatment, but not in the other pairwise comparisons. Finally, three genera level of microbiota, Faecailbacterium, Enterococcus and Methanobrevibacter, were considered as potential biomarkers to distinguish patients in MCS from VS with high accuracy both in the discovery cohorts and validation cohorts. Together, our findings improved the understanding of patients with chronic DoC from intestinal microbiome and provided a new reference for therapeutic targets exploration.

Disabilities and Well-Being

2019 ◽  
pp. 121-137
Author(s):  
Joshua Shepherd
Keyword(s):  
Broad Class ◽  
Minimally Conscious State ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Conscious State ◽  
Minimally Conscious

This chapter argues for a normative distinction between disabilities that are inherently negative with respect to well-being and disabilities that are inherently neutral. After clarifying terms, the author discusses recent arguments according to which possession of a disability is inherently neutral with respect to well-being. He notes that although these arguments are compelling, they are only intended to cover certain disabilities and, in fact, that there exists a broad class regarding which they do not apply. He then discusses two problem cases: locked-in syndrome and the minimally conscious state, and explains why these are cases in which possession of these disabilities makes one worse off overall. He argues that disabilities that significantly impair control over one’s situation tend to be inherently negative with respect to well-being; other disabilities do not. The upshot is that we must draw an important normative distinction between disabilities that undermine this kind of control and disabilities that do not.

scholarly journals When, How, and to What Extent Are Individuals with Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome Able to Progress? Neurobehavioral Progress

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Enrique Noé ◽  
Joan Ferri ◽  
José Olaya ◽  
María Dolores Navarro ◽  
Myrtha O’Valle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Minimally Conscious State ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Conscious State ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Functional Communication ◽  
Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome ◽  
Object Use ◽  
Minimally Conscious

Accurate estimation of the neurobehavioral progress of patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) is essential to anticipate their most likely clinical course and guide clinical decision making. Although different studies have described this progress and possible predictors of neurobehavioral improvement in these patients, they have methodological limitations that could restrict the validity and generalization of the results. This study investigates the neurobehavioral progress of 100 patients with UWS consecutively admitted to a neurorehabilitation center using systematic weekly assessments based on standardized measures, and the prognostic factors of changes in their neurobehavioral condition. Our results showed that, during the analyzed period, 34% of the patients were able to progress from UWS to minimally conscious state (MCS), 12% of the total sample (near one third from those who progressed to MCS) were able to emerge from MCS, and 10% of the patients died. Transition to MCS was mostly denoted by visual signs, which appeared either alone or in combination with motor signs, and was predicted by etiology and the score on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised at admission with an accuracy of 75%. Emergence from MCS was denoted in the same proportion by functional communication and object use. Predictive models of emergence from MCS and mortality were not valid and the identified predictors could not be accounted for.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document