scholarly journals Genetically engineered mouse models of cancer reveal new insights about the antitumor immune response

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel DuPage ◽  
Tyler Jacks
2013 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. i7
Author(s):  
I.J. Huijbers ◽  
R. Bin Ali ◽  
C. Pritchard ◽  
M. Cozijnsen ◽  
N. Proost ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quentin Lemasson ◽  
Hussein Akil ◽  
Jean Feuillard ◽  
Christelle Vincent-Fabert

These last 20 years, research on immune tumor microenvironment led to identify some critical recurrent mechanisms used in cancer to escape immune response. Through immune checkpoints, which are cell surface molecules involved in the immune system control, it is now established that tumor cells are able to shutdown the immune response. Due to the complexity and heterogeneity of Non Hodgkin B-cell Lymphomas (NHBLs), it is difficult to understand the precise mechanisms of immune escape and to explain the mitigated effect of immune checkpoints blockade for their treatment. Because genetically engineered mouse models are very reliable tools to improve our understanding of molecular mechanisms involved in B-cell transformation and, at the same time, can be useful preclinical models to predict immune response, we reviewed hereafter some of these models that highlight the immune escape mechanisms of NHBLs and open perspectives on future therapies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue E. Knoblaugh ◽  
Lauren E. Himmel

There is a growing need to quantitate or “score” lesions in mouse models of human disease, for correlation with human disease and to establish their clinical relevance. Several standard semiquantitative scoring schemes have been adapted for nonneoplastic lesions; similarly, the pathologist must carefully select an approach to score mouse models of cancer. Genetically engineered mouse models with a continuum of precancerous and cancerous lesions and xenogeneic models of various derivations present unique challenges for the pathologist. Important considerations include experimental design, understanding of the human disease being modeled, standardized classification of lesions, and approaches for semiquantitative and/or quantitative scoring in the model being evaluated. Quantification should be considered for measuring the extent of neoplasia and expression of tumor biomarkers. Semiquantitative scoring schemes have been devised that include severity, frequency, and distribution of lesions. Although labor-intensive, scoring mouse models of cancer provides numerical data that enable statistical analysis and greater translational impact.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document