scholarly journals Commentary: No-test medication abortion: A sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyond

Contraception ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 361-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth G. Raymond ◽  
Daniel Grossman ◽  
Alice Mark ◽  
Ushma D. Upadhyay ◽  
Gillian Dean ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 0044118X2110110
Author(s):  
Laura E. Jacobson ◽  
Ana Maria Ramirez ◽  
Chiara Bercu ◽  
Anna Katz ◽  
Caitlin Gerdts ◽  
...  

Young people face social and structural barriers when accessing abortions. High-quality, sexual and reproductive healthcare is needed; however, literature on youth-informed abortion services is limited. This study assesses accounts of youth who obtained an abortion in Argentina, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, and Nigeria and provides recommendations to improve person-centered aspects of abortion quality. We analyzed 48 semi-structured interviews with clients recruited from clinics, safe abortion hotlines, and patent and proprietary medicine vendors. We coded transcripts and conducted a thematic analysis. The mean age was 21 years (range 16–24), and the majority had a first trimester, medication abortion. Prominent themes included access to information; privacy; stigma associated with age or marital status; the decision-making process; and comfort and rapport with providers. Youth-centered abortion care should anticipate the distinct needs of younger clients. Supportive providers have an important role in offering a non-judgmental service that makes young clients feel comfortable and prepared.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Alexandra Wollum ◽  
Sara Larrea ◽  
Caitlin Gerdts ◽  
Kinga Jelinska
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice F Cartwright ◽  
Mihiri Karunaratne ◽  
Jill Barr-Walker ◽  
Nicole E Johns ◽  
Ushma D Upadhyay

BACKGROUND Abortion is a common medical procedure, yet its availability has become more limited across the United States over the past decade. Women who do not know where to go for abortion care may use the internet to find abortion facility information, and there appears to be more online searches for abortion in states with more restrictive abortion laws. While previous studies have examined the distances women must travel to reach an abortion provider, to our knowledge no studies have used a systematic online search to document the geographic locations and services of abortion facilities. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to describe abortion facilities and services available in the United States from the perspective of a potential patient searching online and to identify US cities where people must travel the farthest to obtain abortion care. METHODS In early 2017, we conducted a systematic online search for abortion facilities in every state and the largest cities in each state. We recorded facility locations, types of abortion services available, and facility gestational limits. We then summarized the frequencies by region and state. If the online information was incomplete or unclear, we called the facility using a mystery shopper method, which simulates the perspective of patients calling for services. We also calculated distance to the closest abortion facility from all US cities with populations of 50,000 or more. RESULTS We identified 780 facilities through our online search, with the fewest in the Midwest and South. Over 30% (236/780, 30.3%) of all facilities advertised the provision of medication abortion services only; this proportion was close to 40% in the Northeast (89/233, 38.2%) and West (104/262, 39.7%). The lowest gestational limit at which services were provided was 12 weeks in Wyoming; the highest was 28 weeks in New Mexico. People in 27 US cities must travel over 100 miles (160 km) to reach an abortion facility; the state with the largest number of such cities is Texas (n=10). CONCLUSIONS Online searches can provide detailed information about the location of abortion facilities and the types of services they provide. However, these facilities are not evenly distributed geographically, and many large US cities do not have an abortion facility. Long distances can push women to seek abortion in later gestations when care is even more limited.


2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret W. Beal
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Van Bebber ◽  
Kathryn A. Phillips ◽  
Tracy A. Weitz ◽  
Heather Gould ◽  
Felicia Stewart

Contraception ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 351-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ushma D. Upadhyay ◽  
Daniel Grossman
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 147 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Diamond‐Smith ◽  
Beth Phillips ◽  
Joanna Percher ◽  
Malvika Saxena ◽  
Pravesh Dwivedi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document