Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic treatment construct across anxiety, depression, substance, eating and borderline personality disorders: A systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 141-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise Sloan ◽  
Kate Hall ◽  
Richard Moulding ◽  
Shayden Bryce ◽  
Helen Mildred ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanna Mioni ◽  
Marc Wittmann ◽  
Elena Prunetti ◽  
Franca Stablum

Patients with borderline personality disorders (BPD) show heightened negative affect and maladaptive emotion-regulation strategies. An individual's time perspective towards the past, present, and future as well as the feeling of time passage are strongly related to affect and emotion regulation. We therefore assessed the time perspective (Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, ZTPI) and the subjective passage of time for present and past time intervals (Subjective Time Questionnaire, STQ) in 17 patients with BPD between the ages of 18 and 52 and 17 control subjects matched for gender, age and education. Patients with BPD show deviations in nearly all time orientations in the ZTPI: lower scores in the future and the past-positive dimension and higher scores in the present-fatalistic and past-negative dimensions. Patients deviate significantly more than controls from a balanced time perspective (BTP). Regarding the STQ, patients with BPD feel a general expansion of time at present but not for past intervals. Taken together, we show how BPD can be understood as a strong imbalance in individual time orientations and a most likely negatively felt expansion of subjective time in daily life.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.A. Polskaya

Results of the empirical study on the relation between emotion regulation factors and the peculiarity of self-injurious behavior in clinical and nonclinical groups are reported. Participants of the research (N=68) comprised two groups: inpatients with borderline personality disorders (N=33; М=44,9, SD=10,8) and control group (N=35; M=39,3, SD=11,2). Methods: the scale of reasons for self-injurious behavior (Polskaya, 2014), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Garnefski et al., 2002, Rasskazova et al., 2011), the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (Lazarus, Folkman, 1988, Kryukova, Kuftyak, 2004) and Emotional Intelligence questionnaire (Lyusin, 2009). Conclusion: 1) self-injuries are observed both in clinical and nonclinical group; in patients with borderline personality disorders they are related to a certain mental state and/or a wish to change it, whereas in control group self-injuries possess a reactive character; 2) such strategies of cognitive emotion regulation as decreased ability to plan, rumination and catastrophizing, can be regarded as markers of self-injurious behavior; 3) self-injury in patients with borderline personality disorders is related to decreased understanding of emotion, whereas in control group it is related to emotion management and expression; 4) self-injury can execute antisuicidal function and be reinforced by constructive strategies of emotion regulation in the structure of coping behavior or defense mechanisms.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 382-393
Author(s):  
Merete S. Johansen ◽  
Sigmund W. Karterud ◽  
Eivind Normann-Eide ◽  
Frida G. Rø ◽  
Elfrida H. Kvarstein ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee S. Mann ◽  
Thomas N. Wise ◽  
Errol A. Segall ◽  
Richard L. Goldberg ◽  
David M. Goldstein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document