Clinical impact of FDG PET-CT in patients with potentially operable metastatic colorectal cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 66 (12) ◽  
pp. 1167-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.H. Briggs ◽  
F.U. Chowdhury ◽  
J.P.A. Lodge ◽  
A.F. Scarsbrook
2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1687-1693 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hendlisz ◽  
V. Golfinopoulos ◽  
C. Garcia ◽  
A. Covas ◽  
P. Emonts ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. iii12
Author(s):  
Angelica Nazarian ◽  
Zoe Andrada ◽  
Joanne Thomas ◽  
Sudipta Sureshbabu ◽  
Nathaniel Berman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Emir Sokolović ◽  
Timur Cerić ◽  
Šejla Cerić ◽  
Semir Bešlija ◽  
Sandra Vegar-Zubović ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Objective. </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and to compare it with classical prognostic markers.</p><p><strong>Materials and Methods. </strong>The study included 70 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had not been treated for the metastatic disease. The patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT as part of their routine diagnostic reevaluation. During the analysis, the value of the largest tumor diameter and SUVmax was determined for the lesion with the highest SUVmax observed. The values of CEA and CA 19-9 were recorded 7 days before the PET/CT analysis.</p><p><strong>Results. </strong>SUVmax and Carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 were found to be independent prognostic markers of disease progression within 12 months. Based on the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, the patients could be divided into two groups: SUVmax≤4.1 vs. SUVmax&gt;4.1. Patients with SUVmax values of 4.1 or less had significantly better progression-free survival within 12 months with an HR (95% CI) of 2.97 (1.4-6.3), relative to patients with SUVmax values above 4.1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion. </strong>SUVmax may be used as a novel prognostic marker of disease progression among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Values of SUVmax can be used to select patients with a more aggressive type of disease and higher risk for progression within 12 months of PET/CT analysis.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 2683-2691
Author(s):  
Zsuzsanna Nemeth ◽  
Wouter Wijker ◽  
Zsolt Lengyel ◽  
Erika Hitre ◽  
Katalin Borbely

AbstractWe tested the prognostic relevance of metabolic parameters and their relative changes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with monoclonal antibody and chemotherapy. SUVmax (standardized uptake volume), SAM (standardized added metabolic activity) and TLG (total lesion glycolysis) are assessed with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) to evaluate total metabolic activity of malignant processes. Our purpose was to investigate the change of glucose metabolism in relation to PFS (progression free survival) and OS (overall survival). Fifty-three patients with mCRC with at least one measurable liver metastasis were included in this prospective, multi-center, early exploratory study. All patients were treated with first-line chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Metabolic parameters, like SUVmax, SAM, normalized SAM (NSAM) and TLG were assessed by FDG-PET/CT, carried out at baseline (scan-1) and after two therapeutic cycle (scan-2). Our results suggested neither SUVmax nor TLG have such prognostic value as NSAM in liver metastases of colorectal cancer. The parameters after the two cycles of chemotherapy proved to be better predictors of the clinical outcome. NSAM after two cycles of treatment has a statistically significant predictive value on OS, while SAM was predictive to the PFS. The follow up normalized SAM after 2 cycles of first line oncotherapy was demonstrated to be useful as prognostic biomarkers for OS in metastatic colorectal cancer. We should introduce this measurement in metastatic colorectal cancer if there is at least one metastasis in the liver.


2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1628-1634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irène Buvat ◽  
Hatem Necib ◽  
Camilo Garcia ◽  
Antoine Wagner ◽  
Bruno Vanderlinden ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 1175-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Skougaard ◽  
Dorte Nielsen ◽  
Benny Vittrup Jensen ◽  
Per Pfeiffer ◽  
Helle Westergren Hendel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document