Cervical cerclage in women with short cervix did not greatly reduce the risk of early preterm birth

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-16
2017 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 37S ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupsa Boelig ◽  
Michela Villani ◽  
Eva Jiang ◽  
Kelly Orzechowski ◽  
Vincenzo Berghella

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
N. Vasudeva ◽  
C. Reddington ◽  
M. Bogdanska ◽  
L. De Luca

One of the biggest obstetric challenges is the diagnosis and management of a short cervix as cervical length has an inverse relationship with risk of preterm birth. A cervical cerclage is a surgical procedure to reduce the risk of preterm birth and can be placed in an elective or emergency setting. This is a retrospective review of cervical cerclages inserted at an outer metropolitan hospital from February 2014 to May 2017. Since the introduction of the service, a total of 43 patients were identified as requiring a cervical cerclage. Four of these patients were transferred to tertiary hospitals. Of the 39 cerclages inserted, 26 were elective and 13 were emergency, placed at a mean gestation of 15.6 and 19.6 weeks. In total, there were 35 live births, 2 stillbirths, and 2 neonatal deaths. The maternal demographics (age, gravidity, parity, and preterm risk factors) were not statistically significant between the two groups. The mean pregnancy prolongation and birthweight was greater in the elective than the emergency group (21.4 versus 14.1 weeks; 3148.2 versus 2447.2 grams). There was no obvious pattern with which patients received antibiotics pre-, intra-, or postoperatively or received a vaginal swab. This audit identified the need for improvements to guidelines to standardise the use of antibiotics and progesterone in women with a cervical cerclage.


2012 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 744-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
FLORENT FUCHS ◽  
MARIE-VICTOIRE SENAT ◽  
HERVÉ FERNANDEZ ◽  
AMÉLIE GERVAISE ◽  
RENÉ FRYDMAN ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 212 (1) ◽  
pp. S101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Scolari Childress ◽  
Amy Flick ◽  
Erin Dickert ◽  
Jeffrey Gavard ◽  
Ricardo Bolanos ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (S1) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
F. Fuchs ◽  
H. Fernandez ◽  
J. Bouyer ◽  
R. Frydman ◽  
M. Senat

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashad Issah ◽  
Rosanna Diacci ◽  
Kimberley P. Williams ◽  
Anne-Marie Aubin ◽  
Liam McAuliffe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of death in children under five years. Spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) is the major cause of preterm delivery. The key risk factors for SPTB are women who have a short cervix and women who have had previous preterm birth. Cervical cerclage has been used for several decades and has shown to decrease rates of preterm birth. The most commonly used cerclage techniques were described by Shirodkar and McDonald, with no current consensus on the preferred technique. The objective of this review is to determine and compare the effectiveness of both techniques. Methods Studies will be sourced from six electronic databases, as well as from experts in the field, reference lists, and grey literature. Eligible studies will include pregnant women, with a singleton or twin pregnancy, requiring a cervical cerclage, using either the Shirodkar or McDonald technique and run comparative analyses between the two techniques. Randomized control trials (RCT)s, non-randomized control trials, and cohort studies will be eligible. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening at abstract and full-text level, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Discrepancies will be resolved by a consensus third reviewer if required. Fixed-effects or random-effects models will be used where appropriate to synthesize results. Alternative synthesis methods will be investigated in instances where a meta-analysis is not appropriate, such as summarizing effect estimates, combining P values, vote counting based on direction of effect, or synthesis in narrative form. Discussion This review will synthesize the evidence on both the Shirodkar and McDonald cerclage method, and will help clinicians and health services to determine and deliver best practice antenatal care that has the potential to make an impact on preterm birth. Systematic review registration PROSPERO on 25 of May, 2020 with registration number CRD42020177386


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document