scholarly journals Impact of 1% chlorhexidine gluconate bathing and emollient application on bacterial pathogen colonization dynamics in hospitalized preterm neonates – A pilot clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 100946
Author(s):  
Angela Dramowski ◽  
Sheylyn Pillay ◽  
Adrie Bekker ◽  
Ilhaam Abrahams ◽  
Mark F. Cotton ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 963-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Small ◽  
Debra Adams ◽  
Anna L. Casey ◽  
Cynthia T. Crosby ◽  
Peter A. Lambert ◽  
...  

We undertook a clinical trial to compare the efficacy of 2% (w/v) chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol with the efficacy of 70% (v/v) isopropyl alcohol alone for skin disinfection to prevent peripheral venous catheter colonization and contamination. We found that the addition of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate reduced the number of peripheral venous catheters that were colonized or contaminated.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (26) ◽  
pp. 3421-3428
Author(s):  
E Wali Iman ◽  
H Bassyouni Rasha ◽  
Ahmed El Seidi Eman ◽  
Edris Amira ◽  
Ahmed Abdel Razek Abdel Rahman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 578-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Benoit D’Journo ◽  
Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz ◽  
Marco Alifano ◽  
Jean-Philippe Le Rochais ◽  
Thomas D’Annoville ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e028022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Clarke ◽  
Jean V Craig ◽  
John Wain ◽  
Catherine Tremlett ◽  
Louise Linsell ◽  
...  

IntroductionCatheter-related sepsis is one of the most dangerous complications of neonatal intensive care and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Use of catheter-care ‘bundles’ has reduced the incidence of catheter-related sepsis, although individual components have not been well studied. Better evidence is needed to guide selection of the most appropriate antiseptic solution for skin disinfection in preterm neonates. This study will inform the feasibility and design of the first randomised controlled trial to examine the safety and efficacy of alcohol-based versus aqueous-based chlorhexidine antiseptic formulations for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheterisation in preterm neonates. The antiseptics to be compared are 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) aqueous and 2% CHG in 70% isopropyl alcohol.Methods and analysisThe Antiseptic Randomised Controlled Trial for Insertion of Catheters (ARCTIC) is a two-centre randomised-controlled feasibility trial. At least 100 preterm infants born at <34 weeks’ gestation and due to undergo percutaneous insertion of a central venous catheter will be randomly allocated to receive prior skin disinfection with one of the two antiseptic solutions. Outcomes include: i) recruitment and retention rates; ii) completeness of data collection; iii) numbers of enrolled infants meeting case definitions for definite catheter-related sepsis, catheter-associated sepsis and catheter colonisation and iv) safety outcomes of skin morbidity scores recorded daily from catheter insertion until 48 hours post removal. The key feasibility metrics will be reported as proportions with 95% CIs. Estimated prevalence of catheter colonisation will allow calculation of sample size for the large-scale trial. The data will inform whether it will be feasible to progress to a large-scale trial.Ethics and disseminationARCTIC has been approved by the National Health Service Health Research Authority National Research Ethics Service Committee East of England (Cambridge South) (IRAS ID 163868), was adopted onto the National Institute of Health Research Clinical Research Network portfolio (CPMS ID 19899) and is registered with an International Standard Randomised Control Trials Number (ISRCTN: 82571474; Pre-results) and European Clinical Trials Database number 2015-000874-36. Dissemination plans include presentations at scientific conferences, scientific publications and sharing of the findings with parents via the support of Bliss baby charity.Trial registration numberISRCTN82571474; Pre-results.


Author(s):  
MohamadHosein Lookzadeh ◽  
ElahaJafari Abeshoori ◽  
Mahmood Noorishadkam ◽  
Seyed Reza Mirjalili ◽  
Hamid Reza Mohammadi ◽  
...  

Background: Apnea of prematurity is often found in preterm neonates with gestational age less than 34-37 weeks or birth weight (BW) less than 1000 grams. The American Academy of Pediatrics defines apnea as a respiratory halt lasting at least 20 seconds, with bradycardia or cyanosis. Methylxanthines reduce the incidence of apnea. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of caffeine and aminophylline on the incidence of apnea in premature neonates.    Methods: This randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 80 premature neonates at ShahidSadoughihospital in Yazd. The first group received the initial dose of 5 mg /kg aminophylline diluted in 5% dextrose with a maintenance dose of 2 mg /kg every 8 hours, while the second group received 30mg/kg of caffeine diluted in 5% dextrose with a 24-hour maintenance dose of 10 mg/kg.                                                                                    Results: The frequency of apnea was less in caffeine group but it was not significantly different between intervention groups (Pvalue=0.121). Although there was a significant difference in respiratory status between the two groups; so in caffeine group, oxyhood was less necessary for neonates (Pvalue=0.012). Using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was significantly less in aminophylline group (Pvalue=0.012).                                     Conclusion: The frequency of apnea was less in the caffeine group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.121). Aminophylline treatment in comparison with caffeine can reduce the need for CPAP in neonates with apnea.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document