Landowner preferences for agri-environmental agreements to conserve the montado ecosystem in Portugal

2015 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 159-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Santos ◽  
Pedro Clemente ◽  
Roy Brouwer ◽  
Paula Antunes ◽  
Rute Pinto
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 73-134
Author(s):  
Rachael E. Goodhue ◽  
Susan Stratton Sayre ◽  
Leo K. Simon

2020 ◽  
Vol 786 (11) ◽  
pp. 47-53
Author(s):  
A.V. DERBENEV ◽  
◽  
D.M. VADIVASOV ◽  

Environmental protection, climate change, and the protection of the planet’s biodiversity are becoming top priorities in modern society. Environmental agreements, while important and necessary, including for achieving sustainable development goals, impose additional restrictions on products and producers of these products. These restrictions can be used by countries to create barriers to the import of construction materials. Countries that have ratified environmental agreements may restrict the import of products that do not meet environmental requirements or criteria in one way or another. International environmental management tools are described, in particular environmental and climate declarations, which can serve as tools for solving the problem of possible restrictions and barriers in the export of construction materials produced in the Russian Federation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Cohen ◽  
Emma S. Norman

This article builds on regional environmental governance (REG) scholarship to explore alternatives to conventional transboundary agreements. Specifically, we use two narratives to tell the story of one river variously known as Wimahl, Nich’i-Wàna, or Swah’netk’qhu, and, more recently, the Columbia River. We suggest that the state-led narrative of the signing and implementation of the 1964 Columbia River Treaty has obscured Indigenous narratives of the river—a trend replicated in most scholarship on transboundary environmental agreements more broadly. In exploring these narratives, we: situate the silencing of Indigeneity in the 1964 Columbia River Treaty; highlight the reproduction and amplification of that silence in the relevant literature in the context of strengthened Indigenous rights; and explore what a multilateral—as opposed to binational—approach to environmental agreements might offer practitioners and scholars of REG.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document