Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with chronic abdominal pain with or without diarrhea: A Greek multicenter study

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. e63-e66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Katsinelos ◽  
Kostas Fasoulas ◽  
Athanasios Beltsis ◽  
Grigoris Chatzimavroudis ◽  
George Paroutoglou ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. S298-S298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Mele ◽  
Anthony Infantolino ◽  
Mitchell Conn ◽  
Thomas Kowalski ◽  
Sidney Cohen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-156
Author(s):  
Manuele Furnari ◽  
Andrea Buda ◽  
Gabriele Delconte ◽  
Davide Citterio ◽  
Theodor Voiosu ◽  
...  

Background & Aims: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with unclear etiology that may show functioning or non-functioning features. Primary tumor localization often requires integrated imaging. The European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society (ENETS) guidelines proposed wireless-capsule endoscopy (WCE) as a possible diagnostic tool for NETs, if intestinal origin is suspected. However, its impact on therapeutic management is debated. We aimed to evaluate the yield of WCE in detecting intestinal primary tumor in patients showing liver NET metastases when first-line investigations are inconclusive.Method: Twenty-four patients with histological diagnosis of metastatic NET from liver biopsy and no evidence of primary lesions at first-line investigations were prospectively studied in an ENETS-certified tertiary care center. Wireless-capsule endoscopy was requested before explorative laparotomy and intra-operative ultrasound. The diagnostic yield of WCE was compared to the surgical exploration.Results: Sixteen subjects underwent surgery; 11/16 had positive WCE identifying 16 bulging lesions. Mini-laparotomy found 13 NETs in 11/16 patients (9 small bowel, 3 pancreas, 1 bile ducts). Agreement between WCE and laparotomy was recorded in 9 patients (Sensitivity=75%; Specificity=37.5%; PPV=55%; NPV=60%). Correspondence assessed per-lesions produced similar results (Sensitivity=70%; Specificity=25%; PPV=44%; NPV=50%). No capsule retentions were recorded.Conclusions: Wireless-capsule endoscopy is not indicated as second-line investigation for patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic NETs. In the setting of a referral center, it might provide additional information when conventional investigations are inconclusive about the primary site.Abbreviations: DBE: double balloon enteroscopy; GEP-NET: gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; GI: gastrointestinal; ENETS: European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society; NET: neuroendocrine tumor; SSRS: somatostatin receptor scintigraphy; WCE: wireless capsule endoscopy.


2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. AB79
Author(s):  
Annette Fritscher-Ravens ◽  
Peter L. Shcherbakov ◽  
Philip Bufler ◽  
Kaija-Leena Kolho ◽  
Mike Thomson ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A274.1-A274
Author(s):  
MR Smith ◽  
B Drinkwater ◽  
R Mahmood ◽  
P Nicolson ◽  
S Ishaq ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e87396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liping Yang ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
Bingling Zhang ◽  
Chunxiao Chen ◽  
Min Yue ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document