Dignity at the end of life in traditional Chinese culture: perspectives of advanced cancer patients and family members

Abstract Background: Patients suffering from advanced cancer often loose contact with their primary care physician (PCP) during oncologic treatment and palliative care is introduced very late.The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and procedures for a randomized trial of an intervention to teach PCPs a palliative care approach and communication skills to improve advanced cancer patients’ quality of life. Methods: Observational pilot study in 5 steps. 1) Recruitment of PCPs. 2) Intervention: training on palliative care competencies and communication skills addressing end-of-life issues.3) Recruitment of advanced cancer patients by PCPs. 4) Patients follow-up by PCPs, and assessment of their quality of life by a research assistant 5) Feedback from PCPs using a semi-structured focus group and three individual interviews with qualitative deductive theme analysis.Results: 8 PCPs were trained. PCPs failed to recruit patients for fear of imposing additional loads on their patients. PCPs changed their approach of advanced cancer patients. They became more conscious of their role and responsibility during oncologic treatments and felt empowered to take a more active role picking up patient’s cues and addressing advance directives. They developed interprofessional collaborations for advance care planning. Overall, they discovered the role to help patients to make decisions for a better end-of-life.Conclusions: PCPs failed to recruit advanced cancer patients, but reported a change in paradigm about palliative care. They moved from a focus on helping patients to die better, to a new role helping patients to define the conditions for a better end-of-life.Trial registration : The ethics committee of the canton of Geneva approved the study (2018-00077 Pilot Study) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki

Download Full-text

An early palliative care intervention can be confronting but reassuring: A qualitative study on the experiences of patients with advanced cancer

Palliative Medicine ◽

10.1177/0269216319847884 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 33 (7) ◽

pp. 783-792 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Monica Fliedner ◽

Sofia Zambrano ◽

Jos MGA Schols ◽

Marie Bakitas ◽

Christa Lohrmann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Palliative Care ◽

End Of Life ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Advanced Cancer ◽

Advanced Cancer Patients ◽

End Of Life Decisions ◽

Early Palliative Care ◽

Network Support ◽

Care Intervention ◽

Life Decisions

Background: Intervention trials confirm that patients with advanced cancer receiving early palliative care experience a better quality of life and show improved knowledge about and use of palliative care services. To involve patients in future health-care decisions, health professionals should understand patients’ perspectives. However, little is known about how patients’ experience such interventions. Aim: To explore advanced cancer patients’ experiences with a structured early palliative care intervention, its acceptability and impact on the patients’ life including influencing factors. Design: Qualitative content analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Setting/participants: Patients with various advanced cancer diagnoses were enrolled in a multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT01983956), which investigated the impact of “Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support,” a structured early palliative care intervention, on distress. Of these, 20 patients who underwent the intervention participated in this study. Results: Participants received the intervention well and gained a better understanding of their personal situation. Patients reported that the intervention can feel “confronting” but with the right timing it can be confirming and facilitate family conversations. Patients’ personal background and the intervention timing within their personal disease trajectory influenced their emotional and cognitive experiences; it also impacted their understanding of palliative care and triggered actions toward future care planning. Conclusion: Early palliative care interventions like “Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support” may provoke emotions and feel “confrontational” often because this is the first time when issues about one’s end of life are openly discussed; yet, advanced cancer patients found it beneficial and felt it should be incorporated into routine care.

Download Full-text

Individual Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Advanced Cancer Patients

10.1093/med/9780199837229.003.0003 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

William Breitbart ◽

Wendy G. Lichtenthal ◽

Allison J. Applebaum ◽

Melissa Masterson

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

End Of Life ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Advanced Cancer ◽

Therapeutic Intervention ◽

Well Being ◽

Existential Psychology ◽

Advanced Cancer Patients ◽

Spiritual Well Being ◽

Existential Concerns

Among the advanced cancer population, existential concerns are major issues that promote significant distress. For patients who are facing death, meaning and the preservation of meaning are not only clinically and existentially important but also central concepts to a therapeutic intervention. Based on Viktor Frankl’s logotherapy and the principles of existential psychology and philosophy, “meaning-centered psychotherapy” was developed to help patients with advanced cancer sustain or enhance a sense of meaning, peace, and purpose in their lives. This chapter provides an overview of work developing and testing individual meaning-centered psychotherapy (IMCP). It provides an overview of the session content in the IMCP intervention. It also presents findings from clinical trials, which support the efficacy of IMCP as an intervention to increase a sense of meaning, spiritual well-being, and hope while decreasing end-of-life despair. Furthermore, it presents difficult scenarios that may arise when delivering IMCP for clinicians interested in this work.

Download Full-text

Barriers to end-of-life discussion with advanced cancer patient as perceived by oncologists, certified/specialized nurses in cancer nursing and medical social workers

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1093/jjco/hyaa146 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 50 (12) ◽

pp. 1426-1433

Author(s):

Yasutaka Kimura ◽

Miki Hosoya ◽

Kyoko Toju ◽

Chikako Shimizu ◽

Tatsuya Morita

Keyword(s):

End Of Life ◽

Social Workers ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Advanced Cancer ◽

Emotional Support ◽

Health Care Team ◽

Medical Professionals ◽

Advanced Cancer Patients ◽

Common View ◽

Cancer Nursing

Abstract Objective The objectives of this study were to identify barriers to end-of-life discussion with advanced cancer patients and their families as perceived by oncologists, certified/specialized nurses in cancer nursing (hereafter, collectively referred to as ‘nurses’) and medical social workers, as well as to clarify their opinions about effective strategies to facilitate end-of-life discussion. Methods A questionnaire survey was distributed to 4354 medical professionals working at 402 designated regional cancer hospitals in Japan. Responses were obtained from 494 oncologists (valid response rate 30.7%), 993 nurses (46.7%) and 387 medical social workers (48.1%). Results Among the barriers to end-of-life discussion with advanced cancer patients, factors related to patients and families, such as ‘Family members’ difficulty accepting loved one’s poor prognosis’, were recognized as the most important issues, which was the common view shared across the three types of medical professionals who participated in this study. Nurses and medical social workers were significantly more likely than oncologists to recognize as important issues ‘Health care team disagreement about goals of care’ and ‘Lack of training to have conversations for end-of-life discussion’. To facilitate end-of-life discussion, ‘providing mental and emotional support for the patients and their families after end-of-life discussion’ was needed most as perceived by the respondents regardless of their profession. Conclusions Barriers impeding end-of-life discussion were factors related to patients and their families, and oncologists’ close cooperation with nurses and medical social workers is important in providing emotional support for patients and families. To facilitate end-of-life discussion, it is important to share information on patients’ prognosis and goals for treatment among oncologists and other medical professionals, as well as strengthen communication skill of these medical professions.

Download Full-text