Time Perception of Cancer Patients Without Evidence of Disease and Advanced Cancer Patients in a Palliative, End-of-Life-Care Setting

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven ◽  
Johannes Schilderman ◽  
Constans A. H. H. V. M. Verhagen ◽  
Judith B. Prins
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Time Perception ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Informal Caregiver Challenges for Advanced Cancer Patients During End-of-Life Care in Johannesburg, South Africa and Distinctions Based on Place of Death

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S. O'Neil ◽  
Holly G. Prigerson ◽  
Keletso Mmoledi ◽  
Mfanelo Sobekwa ◽  
Mpho Ratshikana-Moloko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Informal Caregiver ◽  
Place Of Death ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

Patients' perspectives on participation in clinical trials and palliative end-of-life care for management of advanced cancers in Nigeria.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-78
Author(s):  
Jideuma Ikenna Egwim ◽  
Smita Palejwala
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Incurable Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Dying

78 Background: Advanced cancers remain a major cause of mortality in Nigeria. Participation in clinical trials (PCTs) and palliative end-of-life care (PEOLC) are two approaches to incurable cancer management in the developed nations but these have been less adopted in Nigeria. This study set out to determine patients’ preferred approach between PCTs and PEOLC for management of advanced cancers in Nigeria. Methods: A survey of 120 advanced cancer patients was conducted using a questionnaire with 5-point Likert scale, variables of interest included demographic information, knowledge and perception about PCTs and PEOLC. Results: Majority of the patients (84%) agree PCTs is an option in management of incurable cancer but just about half accept it is beneficial and will improve their QOL, as against PEOLC, where all the patients considered it an option and deem it beneficial; with 99% and 98% respectively agreeing it will enhance their QOL and that of family members. About 56% believe PCTs carries a risk of burdensome interventions and 52% increased hospital stay at EOL while 47% are of the opinion it will increase cost of care with 45% stating it will lead to increased ICU death. Sixty-nine percent (69%) and 63% respectively agree PCTs increases the suffering of patients and family members while 43% believe it carries a net negative risk-benefit profile, nevertheless, 83% are ready to overlook the risk of PCTs for possible therapeutic benefit while for 87%, the primary motivation for PCTs is personal cure. Majority (58%) believe PCTs does not improve quality of dying/death contrary to PEOLC where 88% believe it would improve the quality of dying/death. Overall, by direct comparison 78%:13% prefer PEOL to PCTs; {X2(p-value), 40.26(0.001)}. Conclusions: Both modalities are acceptable to advanced cancer patients but the study reveals several ethical issues with PCTs including risk of burdensome interventions, suffering of patients, therapeutic misconception and misperception of curability. A major determinant to accepting PEOL is its positive impact on patients’ QOL. Concerted efforts are needed to significantly enhance access of PEOLC to cancer patients.

In-advance end-of-life discussions and the quality of inpatient end-of-life care: a pilot study in bereaved primary caregivers of advanced cancer patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 629-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanori Mori ◽  
Donna Ellison ◽  
Takamaru Ashikaga ◽  
Ursula McVeigh ◽  
Allan Ramsay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Primary Caregivers ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Awareness and attitudes of primary caregivers toward end-of-life care in advanced cancer patients: A cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Rakesh Garg ◽  
Sourav Burman ◽  
Sushma Bhatnagar ◽  
Seema Mishra ◽  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Primary Caregivers ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional

Advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients' perceptions of prognosis and goals of treatment.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6106-6106
Author(s):  
Areej El-Jawahri ◽  
Lara Traeger ◽  
Elyse R. Park ◽  
Joseph A. Greer ◽  
William F. Pirl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Gi Cancers

6106 Background: Patients with advanced cancer require accurate perception of their illness in order to make informed decisions regarding their care. However, little is known about the accuracy of these patients’ illness and prognostic understanding. The objectives of this study are to 1) examine prognostic understanding in patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, 2) assess patient preferences for prognostic information, and 3) explore associations of perceptions with quality of life (QOL) and mood. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 50 patients within 6-12 weeks post diagnosis of advanced GI cancers (gastric, esophageal, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary). We assessed patients’ perceptions of prognosis with a 15-item questionnaire, the Perception of Treatment and Prognosis Questionnaire. QOL and mood were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and hospital anxiety and depression scales (HADS), respectively. Results: We enrolled 50/62 (80%) consecutive eligible patients within an 11-month period. 50% (25/50) of participants responded that the primary goal of their cancer treatment was to “cure their cancer.” Similarly, 54% (27/50) reported that they were “somewhat” to “extremely likely” to be cured from their cancer. Only 22% (10/49) reported having a discussion about their end-of-life care preferences with their oncologist. 76% (38/50) reported wanting to know as many details as possible about their cancer diagnosis and treatment and 64% (32/50) rated this information as “extremely important.” Patients who perceived knowing about their prognosis as “extremely helpful” reported a better QOL (p = 0.009), lower symptoms of anxiety (p = 0.02) and depression (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Although the majority of patients report that they desire detailed information about their prognosis, half incorrectly perceived their cancer as curable and the majority did not discuss their end-of-life care preferences with their oncologist. Patients who found learning about their prognosis to be extremely helpful reported better QOL and mood. Studies of interventions to increase advanced cancer patients’ knowledge of their prognosis and to encourage end-of-life discussions are warranted.

Role of D-dimer in advanced cancer patients receiving end of life care.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20504-e20504
Author(s):  
So Yeon Oh ◽  
Sung Jae Park ◽  
In Ki Park ◽  
Ga Jin Lim ◽  
Hyun Jung Jun
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
D Dimer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document