Non-radial cost Luenberger productivity indicator

2017 ◽  
Vol 256 (2) ◽  
pp. 629-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Hui Lin ◽  
Tsu-Tan Fu ◽  
Chia-Li Chen ◽  
Jia-Ching Juo
2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1899-1910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Brandouy ◽  
Walter Briec ◽  
Kristiaan Kerstens ◽  
Ignace Van de Woestyne

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Pestana Barros ◽  
António Gomes de Menezes ◽  
José António Cabral Vieira ◽  
Nicolas Peypoch ◽  
Bernardin Solonandrasana

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Chen ◽  
Tsu-Tan Fu ◽  
Jia-Ching Juo ◽  
Ming-Miin Yu

To insure a proper and meaningful productivity assessment of DMUs with different production technologies, this article develops a difference-based profit metafrontier Luenberger productivity indicator. Adopting the proposed model, we empirically measure the profit inefficiency and examine the profit productivity convergence for samples banks consisting of 31 Taiwanese banks and 50 Chinese city banks over 2010–2014. Empirical results show that Chinese banks perform better in profit efficiency than Taiwanese banks. While Chinese banks have better technology in profit creation than Taiwanese banks, the latter may reap much higher profit gain than the former if they can adopt the profit metafrontier. The results of the profit metafrontier Luenberger productivity indicator analysis show that both Chinese and Taiwanese banks have experienced declines in profit productivity. However, the results also indicate a divergence in productivity growth for Chinese city banks and a convergent productivity growth for Taiwanese banks. JEL CLASSIFICATION: D20, G21, P34


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document