Productivity change of Taiwanese farmers’ credit unions: a nonparametric metafrontier Malmquist–Luenberger productivity indicator

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Ching Juo ◽  
Yu-Hui Lin ◽  
Tsai-Chia Chen
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 548-555
Author(s):  
Luis Guilherme Ribeiro Martins ◽  
Maria Teresinha Arns Steiner ◽  
Volmir Eugenio Wilhelm ◽  
Pedro Jose Steiner Neto ◽  
Bruno Samways dos Santos

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po-Chi Chen ◽  
Ming-Miin Yu ◽  
Ching-Cheng Chang ◽  
Shih-Hsun Hsu

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Guilherme Ribeiro Martins ◽  
Maria Teresinha Arns Steiner ◽  
Volmir Eugênio Wilhelm ◽  
Pedro José Steiner Neto ◽  
Bruno Samways Dos Santos

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the efficiency and productivity change of Paraná’s Credit Union. The analysis considered 45 units (each credit union researched), each of one with 10 variables in each period (8 inputs and 2 outputs). This evaluation has taken into account quarterly credit union’s data, from January 2009 to July 2015 (27 periods). The methodology included Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Malmquist Index (MI) techniques. The results showed that DMUs 453, 498 and 517 were considered 100% efficient in all periods, making them ideal benchmarks. There was no case that a DMU was not considered 100% efficient in at least one observation. The MI showed that the difference between the biggest and the smallest average was significant (varying between 19.837 for DMU 251 and 0.926 for DMU 450). The average between all MI was 4,735 with a standard deviation of 3,547, evidencing the different measures of efficiency between each DMU when compared to the others.


1963 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
Leslie B. Schwinn
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-501
Author(s):  
Duk Huh ◽  
Jeong Sup Choi ◽  
Hyun Joong Kim ◽  
Se Mi Jeong ◽  
Jin Nyoun Kim

Author(s):  
Lyudmila Nikolayevna Akimova ◽  
Alla Vasilievna Lysachok

The essence of such concepts is “financial service”, “financial ser- vices market”, and “participants of the financial services market”; determined the purpose of state regulation of the financial services market; forms of state regu- lation of the financial services market; financial services that are present in the financial services market; the structure of state regulation bodies of the financial services market in Ukraine is given; The role of state bodies in the regulation of the financial services market was studied; to characterize the regulatory le- gal regulation of the financial services market in Ukraine; the main problems of functioning of the domestic market of financial services are revealed; ways to solve existing problems. It is grounded that the state regulation of financial ser- vices markets consists in the state’s implementation of a set of measures aimed at regulating and overseeing financial services markets to protect the interests of financial services consumers and preventing crisis phenomena. It is concluded that the financial services market is an important element of the development of the economy as a whole, in particular, it concerns not only the state but also society. We must understand that when this market is settled, that is, all bodies that carry out state regulation are competent in their powers, only then will we make informed, effective decisions about the normal and effective functioning of the RFP. It is important that the data of the subjects of control do not overlap, their activities should be fixed at the legislative level. It is also worth bearing in mind that appropriate conditions must be created to create compensatory mecha- nisms in the financial services markets by developing a system for guarante- eing deposits and providing for payments under long-term life insurance contracts, non-state pension provisions, deposits with deposit accounts to credit unions, etс.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document