The clinical and radiological importance of extraarticular contrast material leakage into adjacent synovial compartments on ankle MR arthrography in patients with OCD and anterolateral impingement

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 (10) ◽  
pp. 1857-1866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayri Ogul ◽  
Yunus Guzel ◽  
Berhan Pirimoglu ◽  
Kutsi Tuncer ◽  
Gokhan Polat ◽  
...  
1996 ◽  
Vol 37 (3P2) ◽  
pp. 627-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Funke ◽  
L. Kopka ◽  
R. Vosshenrich ◽  
J. W. Oestmann ◽  
E. Grabbe

Purpose: To examine the value of fat-suppressed images in MR arthrography of the shoulder in patients with rotator cuff tears. Material and Methods: MR arthrography was performed in 25 patients (9 women, 16 men) ranging from 19 to 64 years. Standard T1-weighted spin-echo images (sSE) and fat-suppressed images (FS) were obtained after intraarticular injection of contrast material. The MR studies were analyzed according to contrast, image quality and conspicuity of pathology. A diagnosis was established without knowledge of the conventional arthrographic findings on the basis of sSE versus FS techniques. Results: The contrast between the intraarticular fluid and the adjacent structures in FS images was increased compared to sSE images in all patients. The conspicuity of anatomical structures was improved in 8 patients. Without fat suppression, 2 false-negative and one false-positive full-thickness tears were diagnosed. With the FS technique, 14 full-thickness tears and 4 partial-thickness tears of the cuff were correctly classified. Conclusion: The results suggest that, if MR arthrography is chosen for a diagnosis of rotator cuff disorders, a fat suppression sequence should be included.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 2606-2613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayri Ogul ◽  
Mecit Kantarci ◽  
Murat Topal ◽  
Leyla Karaca ◽  
Kutsi Tuncer ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 220 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph A. Binkert ◽  
Marco Zanetti ◽  
Christian Gerber ◽  
Juerg Hodler

Radiology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 272 (2) ◽  
pp. 475-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco A. Ugas ◽  
Bang H. Huynh ◽  
Michael G. Fox ◽  
James T. Patrie ◽  
Cree M. Gaskin

2000 ◽  
Vol 175 (4) ◽  
pp. 1087-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. Brown ◽  
David W. Clarke ◽  
Richard H. Daffner

2006 ◽  
Vol 187 (6) ◽  
pp. W565-W568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur A. De Smet ◽  
David M. Horak ◽  
Kirkland W. Davis ◽  
James J. Choi

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Boutin ◽  
Richard A. Marder

Background: SLAP lesions of the shoulder are challenging to diagnose by clinical means alone. Interpretation of MR images requires knowledge of the normal appearance of the labrum, its anatomical variants, and the characteristic patterns of SLAP lesions. In general, high signal extending anterior and posterior to the biceps anchor is the hallmark of SLAP lesions. Common diagnostic criteria for a SLAP lesion by MR or MR arthrography include the following: presence of a laterally curved, high signal intensity in the labrum on a coronal image, multiple or branching lines of high signal intensity in the superior labrum on a coronal image, full-thickness detachment with irregularly marginated high signal intensity and/or separation >2 mm on conventional MRI or 3 mm on MR arthrography between the labrum and glenoid on a coronal image, and a paralabral cyst extending from the superior labrum. Methods: MR diagnosis of SLAP tears may be improved with provocative maneuvers, such as longitudinal traction of the arm or positioning of the shoulder in abduction and external rotation during imaging. The use of intra-articular contrast distends the joint similar to what occurs during arthroscopy and forced diffusion under the labrum may improve the ability to detect SLAP lesions that might not be seen with standard MR. Improved diagnostic accuracy for SLAP tears is seen with 3-T compared with 1.5-T MR imaging, with or without intra-articular contrast material. Conclusion: Regardless of MR findings, however, physicians should be cautious when recommending surgery in the patient with a vague clinical picture. The patient’s history, physical exam, and imaging evaluation all should be considered together in making the decision to proceed with surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document