High Subcortical Sacral Resection {Hiss] for Locally Advanced & Recurrent Rectal Cancer Extending onto L5/S1/2

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. e98
Author(s):  
Edward Pring ◽  
Laura Gould ◽  
Jordan Fletcher ◽  
Taylor Claire ◽  
Therese Hona ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 1078-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazutaka Yamada ◽  
Takashi Ishizawa ◽  
Kiyoshi Niwa ◽  
Yutaka Chuman ◽  
Takashi Aikou

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 4921
Author(s):  
Ailín C. Rogers ◽  
John T. Jenkins ◽  
Shahnawaz Rasheed ◽  
George Malietzis ◽  
Elaine M. Burns ◽  
...  

Treatment strategies for advanced or recurrent rectal cancer have evolved such that the ultimate surgical goal to achieve a cure is complete pathological clearance. To achieve this where the sacrum is involved, en bloc sacrectomy is the current standard of care. Sacral resection is technically challenging and has been described; however, the technique has yet to be streamlined across units. This comprehensive review aims to outline the surgical approach to en bloc sacrectomy for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer, with standardisation of the operative steps of the procedure and to discuss options that enhance the technique.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Fok ◽  
S Toh ◽  
J E Maducolil ◽  
H Fowler ◽  
R Clifford ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer is conventionally performed using photon-based radiotherapy (PBR), carrying significant risk of toxicity to organs at risk (OAR). Proton beam therapy (PBT) potentially delivers equivalent dosimetric radiation to the targeted tissue with improved sparing of OAR. We aimed to compare dosimetric irradiation of OAR for PBT versus PBR in patients with rectal cancer and assess any oncological outcomes. Method An extensive electronic literature search was performed from inception till April 2020 and subsequent meta-analysis performed. Results Six articles met the inclusion criteria. Dosimetric data of irradiation delivered to OAR for PBT and PBR were calculated for the same patients. PBT had significantly less irradiated small bowel compared to 3DCRT and IMRT, (MD -16.95, 95% CI [-24.03, -9.88], p < 0.00001) and (MD -6.96, 95% CI [-12.99, -0.94], p = 0.02) respectively. Similar results were observed for bladder and pelvic bone marrow. Two studies reported clinical and oncological results for PBT in recurrent rectal cancer with overall survival reported as 43% and 68%. Conclusions Dosimetric treatment plans have less irradiation of OAR for rectal cancer with PBT compared to PBR. There is a need for further research in PBT and rectal cancer, as promising results have been shown in recurrent rectal cancer.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. O427-O431 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. A. Bloemendaal ◽  
R. Kraus ◽  
N. C. Buchs ◽  
F. C. Hamdy ◽  
R. Hompes ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S414
Author(s):  
L.O. Petrov ◽  
V.l. Chissov ◽  
D.V. Sidorov ◽  
B.Y. Alekseev ◽  
A.V. Butenko ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 559-566
Author(s):  
Kei Kimura ◽  
Masataka Ikeda ◽  
Jihyung Song ◽  
Michiko Hamanaka ◽  
Akihito Babaya ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. e208522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther N. D. Kok ◽  
Ruben van Veen ◽  
Harald C. Groen ◽  
Wouter J. Heerink ◽  
Nikie J. Hoetjes ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 484-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. C. Lau ◽  
K. Jongerius ◽  
C. Wakeman ◽  
A. G. Heriot ◽  
M. J. Solomon ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
pp. 1021-1022
Author(s):  
H. Takagi ◽  
T. Morimoto ◽  
T. Kato ◽  
M. Yasue ◽  
T. Endo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document