Nationwide Analysis of the Association between Use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Postoperative Complications after Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. e122
Author(s):  
Arthur Elfrink ◽  
Leonie van der Werf ◽  
Niels Kok ◽  
Dirk Grunhagen ◽  
Joost Klaase
2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Pandanaboyana ◽  
Alan White ◽  
Samir Pathak ◽  
Ernest L. Hidalgo ◽  
Giles Toogood ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 2044-2047 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Machado ◽  
F. F. Makdissi ◽  
R. C. Surjan ◽  
G. T. Kappaz ◽  
N. Yamaguchi

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
RS Bhandari ◽  
G Riddiough ◽  
V Muralidharan ◽  
C Christophi

Background Reports on safety and feasibility of liver resection in patients 80 years and older are very limited.Objective Here, we intend to analyze the perioperative outcomes of liver resections in octogenarians performed at a single tertiary level teaching hospital over a ten years period.Method Retrospective review of the medical records (between 2004 to 2014) of patients of the defined age group was performed. Clinicopathological features, indications, extent of resections, intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications and final outcome were analyzed. Findings were compared with similar studies published in literature.Result Total 19 (11 male, 8 female, maximum age 85 years) patients of the study group underwent liver resection during the defined period. Commonest indication was colorectal liver metastasis (9 patients). One patient had pancreaticodudenectomy for periampullary malignancy four years prior to present with liver metastasis and subsequently had liver resection for recurrence of disease. Except one, all had open surgery. Types of resection ranged from sub segmental to major right (8 patients) and left (1 patient) hepatectomy. Total 3 (27%) out of 11 patients on whom drain was not placed required radiological drainage of abdominal collection. One patient developed liver abscess postoperatively and was also successfully drained under radiological guidance. Only 2 (10.5%) had prolonged Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay and remaining patients were discharged to ward after 24 hrs of observation in high dependency/Intensive care unit. Median hospital stay was 11 days. Postoperative complications were 3 of grade II, 4 of grade IIIa, 1 of IIIb and 2 of IVa. Total 9 patients were discharged to rehabilitation centers and remaining 10 could be discharged home. There was 0% mortality.Conclusion In appropriately selected cases, when performed in specialized tertiary centers excellent perioperative outcomes of liver resections can be achieved even in patients of 80 years of age and above.Kathmandu University Medical Journal Vol.13(1) 2015; 19-23


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2619-2627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianhong Peng ◽  
Yixin Zhao ◽  
Qiuyun Luo ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Wenhua Fan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 66-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Pandanaboyana ◽  
Richard Bell ◽  
Alan White ◽  
Samir Pathak ◽  
Ernest Hidalgo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihai-Calin Pavel ◽  
Raquel Casanova ◽  
Laia Estalella ◽  
Robert Memba ◽  
Erik Llàcer-Millán ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Liver resection (LR) in patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer remains the only curative treatment. Perioperative chemotherapy improves prognosis of these patients. However, there are concerns regarding the effect of preoperative chemotherapy on liver regeneration, which is a key event in avoiding liver failure after LR. The primary objective of this systematic review is to assess the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on liver regeneration after (LR) or portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients with liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the impact of the type of chemotherapy, number of cycles, and time between end of treatment and procedure (LR or PVE) and to investigate whether there is an association between degree of hypertrophy and postoperative liver failure. Methods This meta-analysis will include studies reporting liver regeneration rates in patients submitted to LR or PVE. Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases will be searched. Only studies comparing neoadjuvant vs no chemotherapy, or comparing chemotherapy characteristics (bevacizumab administration, number of cycles, and time from finishing chemotherapy until intervention), will be included. We will select studies from 1990 to present. Two researchers will individually screen the identified records, according to a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcome will be future liver remnant regeneration rate. Bias of the studies will be evaluated with the ROBINS-I tool, and quality of evidence for all outcomes will be determined with the GRADE system. The data will be registered in a predesigned database. If selected studies are sufficiently homogeneous, we will perform a meta-analysis of reported results. In the event of a substantial heterogeneity, a qualitative systematic review will be performed. Discussion The results of this systematic review may help to better identify the patients affected by liver metastasis that could present low regeneration rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These patients are at risk to develop liver failure after extended hepatectomies and therefore are not good candidates for such aggressive procedures. Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020178481 (July 5, 2020).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document