Reliably Assessing Duration of Protection for COVID-19 Vaccines

Decision-making about booster dosing for COVID-19 vaccine recipients hinges on reliable methods for evaluating the longevity of vaccine protection. We show that modeling of protection as a piecewise linear function of time since vaccination for the log hazard ratio of the vaccine effect provides more reliable estimates of vaccine effectiveness at the end of an observation period and also more reliably detects plateaus in protective effectiveness as compared with the traditional method of estimating a constant vaccine effect over each time period. This approach will be useful for analyzing data pertaining to COVID-19 vaccines and other vaccines where rapid and reliable understanding of vaccine effectiveness over time is desired.

Evaluation of rumen protective effectiveness of L-carnitine, in vitro and in vivo

This study aimed to evaluate the rumen protective effectiveness of L-carnitine through in vitro tests, rumen degradation tests and in vivo tests. Twelve rumen-fistulated crossbred rams with similar body weights of 55±3.6 kg and ages of 3±0.2 years old were divided into three treatment groups in a 3×3 Latin square design, G1 (basal diet with no additives), G2 (unprotected L-carnitine) or G3 (rumen-protected L-carnitine). Ruminal fluid and blood samples were collected before morning feeding on the last day of each experimental period (21 d). The percentage of L-carnitine remaining in the simulated rumen and abomasum and rumen increased with the increase in the wall material ratio (P< 0.05). L-carnitine supplementation decreased the plasma urea nitrogen concentration of the sheep (P< 0.05). G3 resulted in higher GSH-Px and SOD activities as well as T-AOC and lower MDA concentrations in plasma than G1, and the difference was significant among the groups (P< 0.01). Thus, L-carnitine in the rumen could be protected by encapsulation for a certain time. Unprotected and rumen-protected L-carnitine supplementation effectively enhanced the antioxidant capacity of sheep, and the antioxidant capacity of sheep supplemented with rumen-protected L-carnitine was higher than that of sheep supplemented with unprotected L-carnitine.

Development of the Inactivated QazCovid-in Vaccine: Protective Efficacy of the Vaccine in Syrian Hamsters

In March 2020, the first cases of the human coronavirus disease COVID-19 were registered in Kazakhstan. We isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus from clinical materials from some of these patients. Subsequently, a whole virion inactivated candidate vaccine, QazCovid-in, was developed based on this virus. To develop the vaccine, a virus grown in Vero cell culture was used, which was inactivated with formaldehyde, purified, concentrated, sterilized by filtration, and then adsorbed on aluminum hydroxide gel particles. The formula virus and adjuvant in buffer saline solution were used as the vaccine. The safety and protective effectiveness of the developed vaccine were studied in Syrian hamsters. The results of the studies showed the absolute safety of the candidate vaccine in the Syrian hamsters. When studying the protective effectiveness, the developed vaccine with an immunizing dose of 5 μg/dose specific antigen protected animals from a wild homologous virus at a dose of 104.5 TCID50/mL. The candidate vaccine induced the formation of virus-neutralizing antibodies in vaccinated hamsters at titers of 3.3 ± 1.45 log2 to 7.25 ± 0.78 log2, and these antibodies were retained for 6 months (observation period) for the indicated titers. No viral replication was detected in vaccinated hamsters, protected against the development of acute pneumonia, and ensured 100% survival of the animals. Further, no replicative virus was isolated from the lungs of vaccinated animals. However, a virulent virus was isolated from the lungs of unvaccinated animals at relatively high titers, reaching 4.5 ± 0.7 log TCID50/mL. After challenge infection, 100% of unvaccinated hamsters showed clinical symptoms (stress state, passivity, tousled coat, decreased body temperature, and body weight, and the development of acute pneumonia), with 25 ± 5% dying. These findings pave the way for testing the candidate vaccine in clinical human trials.

Effectiveness of seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) treatments when SMC is implemented at scale: Case–control studies in 5 countries

Background Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) has shown high protective efficacy against clinical malaria and severe malaria in a series of clinical trials. We evaluated the effectiveness of SMC treatments against clinical malaria when delivered at scale through national malaria control programmes in 2015 and 2016. Methods and findings Case–control studies were carried out in Mali and The Gambia in 2015, and in Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Nigeria, and The Gambia in 2016. Children aged 3–59 months presenting at selected health facilities with microscopically confirmed clinical malaria were recruited as cases. Two controls per case were recruited concurrently (on or shortly after the day the case was detected) from the neighbourhood in which the case lived. The primary exposure was the time since the most recent course of SMC treatment, determined from SMC recipient cards, caregiver recall, and administrative records. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) associated with receipt of SMC within the previous 28 days, and SMC 29 to 42 days ago, compared with no SMC in the past 42 days. These ORs, which are equivalent to incidence rate ratios, were used to calculate the percentage reduction in clinical malaria incidence in the corresponding time periods. Results from individual countries were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis. In total, 2,126 cases and 4,252 controls were included in the analysis. Across the 7 studies, the mean age ranged from 1.7 to 2.4 years and from 2.1 to 2.8 years among controls and cases, respectively; 42.2%–50.9% and 38.9%–46.9% of controls and cases, respectively, were male. In all 7 individual case–control studies, a high degree of personal protection from SMC against clinical malaria was observed, ranging from 73% in Mali in 2016 to 98% in Mali in 2015. The overall OR for SMC within 28 days was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.21; p < 0.001), indicating a protective effectiveness of 88% (95% CI: 79%, 94%). Effectiveness against clinical malaria for SMC 29–42 days ago was 61% (95% CI: 47%, 72%). Similar results were obtained when the analysis was restricted to cases with parasite density in excess of 5,000 parasites per microlitre: Protective effectiveness 90% (95% CI: 79%, 96%; P<0.001), and 59% (95% CI: 34%, 74%; P<0.001) for SMC 0–28 days and 29–42 days ago, respectively. Potential limitations include the possibility of residual confounding due to an association between exposure to malaria and access to SMC, or differences in access to SMC between patients attending a clinic and community controls; however, neighbourhood matching of cases and controls, and covariate adjustment, attempted to control for these aspects, and the observed decline in protection over time, consistent with expected trends, argues against a major bias from these sources. Conclusions SMC administered as part of routine national malaria control activities provided a very high level of personal protection against clinical malaria over 28 days post-treatment, similar to the efficacy observed in clinical trials. The case–control design used in this study can be used at intervals to ensure SMC treatments remain effective.

Which strategy for using medical and community masks? A prospective analysis of their environmental impact

IntroductionThe use of personal protective equipment, especially medical masks, increased dramatically during the COVID-19 crisis. Medical masks are made of synthetic materials, mainly polypropylene, and a majority of them are produced in China and imported to the European market. The urgency of the need has so far prevailed over environmental considerations.ObjectiveAssess the environmental impact of different strategies for the use of face mask.MethodA prospective analysis was conducted to assess the environmental impact of different strategies for the use of medical and community masks. Eight scenarios, differentiating the typologies of masks and the modes of reuse are compared using three environmental impact indicators: the Global Warming Potential (GWP100), the ecological scarcity (UBP method, from German ‘Umweltbelastungpunkte’) and the plastic leakage (PL). This study attempts to provide clear recommendations that consider both the environmental impact and the protective effectiveness of face masks used in the community.ResultsThe environmental impact of single-use masks is the most unfavourable, with a GWP of 0.4–1.3 kg CO2 eq., depending on the transport scenario, and a PL of 1.8 g, for a 1 month protection against COVID-19. The use of home-made cotton masks and prolonged use of medical masks through wait-and-reuse are the scenarios with the lowest impact.ConclusionThe use of medical masks with a wait and reuse strategy seems to be the most appropriate when considering both environmental impact and effectiveness. Our results also highlight the need to develop procedures and the legal/operational framework to extend the use of protective equipment during a pandemic.

Efektivitas Dan Keamanan Vaksin Covid-19 : Studi Refrensi

Various strategies and development of the Covid-19 vaccine have been carried out for the control of the Covid-19 pandemic. Various vaccines have undergone clinical trials with promising results in various countries. The effectiveness and safety and short- and long-term side effects of vaccines are a major concern in clinical trials in these strategies and developments. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to find out the effectiveness and safety of the Covid-19 vaccine so that it can inform and increase public confidence in the Covid-19 vaccine through a reference study approach. Method: The research method we use here is a reference study using electronic databases through journals from international and national. Google Scholar, science direx, elsiver, Pubmed are used as the main Journal database for this reference study. Results: From the results of reference studies found that all vaccines in clinical trials have promising effectiveness and safety. The Pfizer-BiONTech vaccine is a vaccine that has a good level of effectiveness and safety with a value of 94.6% and does not cause serious side effects. Double-dose vaccination further improves the immune response in younger and older adults. Conclusion: The Covid-19 vaccine in clinical trials all demonstrates promising immunogenicity with varying levels of protective effectiveness and an acceptable safety profile.

Development Of The Inactivated QazCovid-In Vaccine: Protective Efficacy Of The Vaccine In Syrian Hamsters

In March 2020, the first cases of human coronavirus infection COVID-19 were registered in Kazakhstan. We isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus from the clinical material from the patients. Subsequently, a whole virion inactivated candidate vaccine, QazCovid-in, was developed based on this virus. To obtain the vaccine, a virus grown in Vero cell culture was used, which was inactivated with formaldehyde, purified, concentrated, sterilized by filtration, and then sorbed on aluminum hydroxide gel particles. The formula virus and adjuvant in buffer saline solution was used as a vaccine. The safety and protective effectiveness of the developed vaccine was studied on Syrian hamsters. The results of the studies showed the absolute safety of the candidate vaccine on the Syrian hamsters. When studying the protective effectiveness, the developed vaccine with an immunizing dose of 5 mcg/dose of a specific antigen protected animals from wild virus at a dose of 104.5 TCID50/ml. The candidate vaccine formed virus-neutralizing antibodies in vaccinated hamsters in titers from 3.3 ± 1.45 log2 to 7.25 ± 0.78 log2, which were retained for 6 months (observation period) in the indicated titers. The candidate vaccine suppressed the replication of the wild virus in the body of vaccinated hamsters, protected against the development of acute pneumonia and ensured 100% survival of the animals. At the same time, no replicative virus was isolated from the lungs of vaccinated animals. At the same time, a virulent virus was isolated from the lungs of unvaccinated animals in relatively high titers, reaching 4.5 ± 0.7 lg TCID50/ml. After challenge infection, 100% of unvaccinated hamsters became ill with clinical signs (stress state, passivity, tousled coat, decreased body temperature and body weight, and the development of acute pneumonia), of which 25 ± 5% were fatal. The findings paved the way for testing the candidate vaccine in humans in clinical trials.

The Essential Involvement of the Omentum in the Peritoneal Defensive Mechanisms During Intra-Abdominal Sepsis

Although the abilities of the omentum to alleviate inflammation and prevent infection have been revealed over the past decades, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unelucidated. Here, we demonstrated that the mortality of mice exposed to cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) and omentectomy was remarkably increased compared to those treated with CLP alone. Moreover, the efficacy of the omentum was associated with an impairment in intraperitoneal bacterial clearance together with an increase in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines. Besides, in response to peritoneal infections, the size and quantity of the omental milky spots (MSs) were increased tremendously and they also support innate-like B1 cell responses and local IgM production in the peritoneal cavity. Furthermore, not only the migration but also the functional activities of neutrophils were diminished in the absence of the omentum. These data collectively show that the omentum contributes more to peritoneal immune responses during septic peritonitis than has heretofore been recognized. Thus, harnessing the function of MS-containing omentum to increase its protective effectiveness may exert important biological and therapeutic implications for the control of intra-abdominal infections.