scholarly journals Outcomes of Carotid Artery Endarterectomy (CEA) vs Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) vs Optimal Medical Treatment (OMT) for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Using Propensity Scores

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. e797
Author(s):  
Jihee Kang ◽  
Young-Wook Kim ◽  
Yang-Jin Park ◽  
Seon-Hee Heo ◽  
Dong-Ik Kim ◽  
...  
Angiology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 408-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley S. Moore

The superiority of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) plus best medical treatment (BMT) over BMT alone for the management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis is based on randomized controlled trials that recruited patients up to 30 years ago. Best medical treatment has improved considerably since that time with respect to stroke prevention. Furthermore, a new carotid intervention has emerged during the last 2 decades and has gradually become established, that is, carotid artery stenting (CAS). Consequently, the efficacy of current BMT alone needs to be compared not only with CEA plus BMT but also with CAS plus BMT to determine which strategy achieves the optimal stroke prevention rates. This article highlights the purpose of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) 2 and discusses the issues that CREST-2 will hopefully provide answers to.


BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seong Hwa Jang ◽  
Doo Hyuk Kwon ◽  
Moon-Ku Han ◽  
Hyungjong Park ◽  
Sung-Il Sohn ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Carotid stenosis is a known risk factor for ischemic stroke, and carotid artery stenting is an effective preventive procedure. However, the stroke risk reduction for asymptomatic patients is small. Therefore, it is important to reduce the risk of complications, particularly in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Statins are known to reduce the overall risk of periprocedural complications, although there is a lack of data focusing on asymptomatic patients. We aimed to investigate whether different doses of statin pretreatment can reduce periprocedural complications of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Methods Between July 2003 and June 2013, 276 consecutive patients received CAS for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Periprocedural complications included the outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death within 30 days of CAS. Statin pretreatment was categorized as no-statin (n = 87, 31.5%), standard-dose (< 40 mg, n = 139, 50.4%), and high-dose statin (≥40 mg, n = 50, 18.1%) according to the atorvastatin equivalent dose. The Cochran-Armitage (CA) trend test was performed to investigate the association of periprocedural complications with statin dose. Results The overall periprocedural complication rate was 3.3%. There was no significant difference in the risk of periprocedural complications between the three groups (no statin: n = 3 [3.4%]; standard-dose: n = 4 [2.9%]; high-dose n = 2 [4.0%] p = 0.923). The CA trend test did not demonstrate a trend in the proportion of periprocedural complications across increasing statin equivalent doses (p = 0.919). Conclusions Statin pretreatment before CAS showed neither absolute nor dose-dependent effects against periprocedural complications in asymptomatic patients undergoing CAS.


Angiology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 640-641
Author(s):  
Kosmas I. Paraskevas ◽  
Frank J. Veith ◽  
Dimitri P. Mikhailidis ◽  
Christos D. Liapis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document