A simple accurate formula evaluating origin intensity factor in singular boundary method for two-dimensional potential problems with Dirichlet boundary

2015 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 151-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Wei ◽  
Wen Chen ◽  
Linlin Sun ◽  
Bin Chen
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 460-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiwei Li ◽  
Wen Chen ◽  
Zhuojia Fu

AbstractThis study makes the first attempt to accelerate the singular boundary method (SBM) by the precorrected-FFT (PFFT) for large-scale three-dimensional potential problems. The SBM with the GMRES solver requires computational complexity, where N is the number of the unknowns. To speed up the SBM, the PFFT is employed to accelerate the SBM matrix-vector multiplication at each iteration step of the GMRES. Consequently, the computational complexity can be reduced to . Several numerical examples are presented to validate the developed PFFT accelerated SBM (PFFT-SBM) scheme, and the results are compared with those of the SBM without the PFFT and the analytical solutions. It is clearly found that the present PFFT-SBM is very efficient and suitable for 3D large-scale potential problems.


2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (11) ◽  
pp. 2716-2730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Chen ◽  
Wen Chen ◽  
Alexander H.D. Cheng ◽  
Xing Wei

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 543-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Chen ◽  
Yan Gu

AbstractThis study proposes a new formulation of singular boundary method (SBM) to solve the 2D potential problems, while retaining its original merits being free of integration and mesh, easy-to-program, accurate and mathematically simple without the requirement of a fictitious boundary as in the method of fundamental solutions (MFS). The key idea of the SBM is to introduce the concept of the origin intensity factor to isolate the singularity of fundamental solution so that the source points can be placed directly on the physical boundary. This paper presents a new approach to derive the analytical solution of the origin intensity factor based on the proposed subtracting and adding-back techniques. And the troublesome sample nodes in the ordinary SBM are avoided and the sample solution is also not necessary for the Neumann boundary condition. Three benchmark problems are tested to demonstrate the feasibility and accuracy of the new formulation through detailed comparisons with the boundary element method (BEM), MFS, regularized meshless method (RMM) and boundary distributed source (BDS) method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document