scholarly journals Environmental tobacco smoke and canine urinary cotinine level

2008 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R. Bertone-Johnson ◽  
Elizabeth Procter-Gray ◽  
Audra L. Gollenberg ◽  
Michele B. Ryan ◽  
Lisa G. Barber
1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Scherer ◽  
Irmtrud Meger-Kossien ◽  
Kirsten Riedel ◽  
Thomas Renner ◽  
Michael Meger

1 In order to elucidate the role of exposure to environ-mental tobacco smoke (ETS) in various acute and chronic illnesses in children, it is important to assess the degree of exposure by suitable methods. For this purpose, we determined the exposure to ETS in 39 children (4-15 years) and 43 adults (16+ years) by questionnaires, personal diffusion samplers for nicotine, and cotinine measurements in saliva and urine. In addition, the influence of the smoking status and the location of the home (urban or suburban) on the benzene exposure of the children was investigated. 2 On average, the 24 children living in homes with at least one smoker were exposed to ETS for 3.1 h/d. This is significantly longer (P<0.001) than the daily exposure time of the 15 children from nonsmoking homes (0.3 h/d). The nicotine concentrations on the personal samplers worn over 7 days were 0.615 and 0.046 tghn3 for children from smoking and nonsmoking homes, respectively (P <0.001). Average salivary cotinine levels were 1.95 ng/ml in children from smoking homes and 0.11 ng/ml in children from nonsmoking homes (P<0.01). The corresponding urinary cotinine levels were 29.4 and 4.5 ng/mg creatinine (P<0.001). There was no difference in the extent of ETS exposure between children and adults from smoking households. Adults from nonsmoking homes tended to have higher ETS exposure than children from nonsmoking homes. 3 Exposure to benzene, which was determined by means of personal samplers, measurements of benzene in exhaled air and of the urinary benzene metabolite trans, trans-muconic acid, was not significantly related to the smoking status of the home but primarily dependent on the location of the home.


1984 ◽  
Vol 311 (13) ◽  
pp. 828-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeru Matsukura ◽  
Tomohiko Taminato ◽  
Norikazu Kitano ◽  
Yutaka Seino ◽  
Hisashi Hamada ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Christophe DUBUS ◽  
Christiane ODDOZE ◽  
Monique BADIER ◽  
Chantal GUILLOT ◽  
Bernard BRUGUEROLLE

1.The aim of the study was to determine the carbachol and albuterol responsiveness in treated and untreated asthmatic and allergic children exposed to environmental tobacco smoke assessed by urinary cotinine measurements. 2.Forty-six asthmatic and allergic children with normal spirometric values were recruited. The doubling dose, concentration of carbachol producing a 2-fold increase in specific airway resistance (SRaw) was determined and 200 ;μg of albuterol were administered via a Volumatic® spacer. The percentage of bronchodilatation was defined as the difference between the largest obtained SRaw and the post-β2 SRaw divided by the largest SRaw. Data were compared by a Mann–Whitney U-test. 3.The 23 children with a high urinary cotinine, compared with the 23 children without urinary cotinine, had a decreased doubling dose (108.2±14.7 ;μg versus 160.9±19.5 ;μg; P = 0.04) and an increased percentage of bronchodilatation (74.8±1.4% versus 68.8±1.8%; P = 0.03). A prophylactic anti-inflammatory treatment induced a weaker bronchial reactivity to carbachol and a slightly greater bronchodilatation in children exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. 4.Environmental tobacco smoke increases bronchial reactivity in asthmatic and allergic children. This effect might be reduced by anti-inflammatory therapy. The bronchodilator response may be enhanced in exposed children and may be caused by one or several direct interactions between tobacco smoke compounds and albuterol.


2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Fustinoni ◽  
Laura Campo ◽  
Elisa Polledri ◽  
Rosa Mercadante ◽  
Laura Erspamer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document