scholarly journals Effects of initialization of a global land-use model on simulated land change and loss of natural vegetation

Author(s):  
Jan Schüngel ◽  
Benjamin Stuch ◽  
Claudia Fohry ◽  
Rüdiger Schaldach
2014 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 236-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Philipp Dietrich ◽  
Christoph Schmitz ◽  
Hermann Lotze-Campen ◽  
Alexander Popp ◽  
Christoph Müller

2013 ◽  
Vol 263 ◽  
pp. 233-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Philipp Dietrich ◽  
Alexander Popp ◽  
Hermann Lotze-Campen

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Winkler ◽  
Richard Fuchs ◽  
Martin Herold ◽  
Mark Rounsevell

<p>People have increasingly been shaping the surface of our planet. Land use/cover change – the most visible human footprint on Earth – is one of the main contributors to greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity loss and, hence, is a key topic for current sustainability debates and climate change mitigation. To understand these land surface dynamics and its impacts, accurate reconstructions of global land use/cover change are necessary. Although more and more observational data sets are publicly available (e.g. from remote sensing), current land change assessments are still incomplete and either lack temporal consistency, spatial explicitness or thematic detail. Here, we show a consistent reconstruction of global land use/cover change from 1960-2015, using an open data-driven approach that combines national land use statistics with earth observation data of multiple sources and scales. Our land change reconstruction model HILDA+ (Historic Land Dynamics Assessment) accounts for data-derived gross changes within six main land use/cover classes at 1 km spatial resolution: Urban areas, cropland, pastures and rangeland, forest, (semi-)natural grass- or shrubland, other land. As a result, we present yearly land use/cover maps at 1 km spatial resolution, magnitudes and hot spot areas of change. Globally, around 20 % of the land surface – almost three times the size of Brazil - has undergone change within the last 55 years. Further, gross change is about seven times as high as yearly net change extent for forest, cropland and pasture dynamics. We prove that land change studies accounting for net change only can lead to severe underestimations of change extent and frequency. With this purely data-driven approach, we address current research needs of the earth system modelling community by providing new layers of land use/cover change with unprecedented level of detail. Learning from the recent past, understanding how management and land cover dynamics interactively affect the climate is essential for implementing measures of mitigation and sustainable land use policies. In this context, a solid information base can support informed decision-making.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Williamson ◽  
Andrew Tye ◽  
Dan J. Lapworth ◽  
Don Monteith ◽  
Richard Sanders ◽  
...  

AbstractThe dissolved organic carbon (DOC) export from land to ocean via rivers is a significant term in the global C cycle, and has been modified in many areas by human activity. DOC exports from large global rivers are fairly well quantified, but those from smaller river systems, including those draining oceanic regions, are generally under-represented in global syntheses. Given that these regions typically have high runoff and high peat cover, they may exert a disproportionate influence on the global land–ocean DOC export. Here we describe a comprehensive new assessment of the annual riverine DOC export to estuaries across the island of Great Britain (GB), which spans the latitude range 50–60° N with strong spatial gradients of topography, soils, rainfall, land use and population density. DOC yields (export per unit area) were positively related to and best predicted by rainfall, peat extent and forest cover, but relatively insensitive to population density or agricultural development. Based on an empirical relationship with land use and rainfall we estimate that the DOC export from the GB land area to the freshwater-seawater interface was 1.15 Tg C year−1 in 2017. The average yield for GB rivers is 5.04 g C m−2 year−1, higher than most of the world’s major rivers, including those of the humid tropics and Arctic, supporting the conclusion that under-representation of smaller river systems draining peat-rich areas could lead to under-estimation of the global land–ocean DOC export. The main anthropogenic factor influencing the spatial distribution of GB DOC exports appears to be upland conifer plantation forestry, which is estimated to have raised the overall DOC export by 0.168 Tg C year−1. This is equivalent to 15% of the estimated current rate of net CO2 uptake by British forests. With the UK and many other countries seeking to expand plantation forest cover for climate change mitigation, this ‘leak in the ecosystem’ should be incorporated in future assessments of the CO2 sequestration potential of forest planting strategies.


2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Kløverpris ◽  
Henrik Wenzel ◽  
Martin Banse ◽  
Llorenç Milà i Canals ◽  
Anette Reenberg

1969 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.L. Cripps ◽  
D.H.S. Foot

2009 ◽  
Vol 220 (18) ◽  
pp. 2302-2309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Chandralal Wickramasuriya ◽  
Arnold K. Bregt ◽  
Hedwig van Delden ◽  
Alex Hagen-Zanker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document